Academic literature on the topic 'Toxis torts'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Toxis torts.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Toxis torts"
Afshari, F., and M. Maghasedi. "Rhomboidal C4C8 toris which are Cayley graphs." Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications 11, no. 03 (June 2019): 1950033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1793830919500332.
Full textLEVIN, A. S. ""Toxic Torts"." Science 235, no. 4786 (January 16, 1987): 268a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4786.268a.
Full textHILEMAN, BETTE. "WEIGHING TOXIC TORTS." Chemical & Engineering News 85, no. 42 (October 15, 2007): 44–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v085n042.p044.
Full textHarrison, R. J. "Science/ Law Interactions and the Problem of Causation." Energy & Environment 11, no. 2 (March 2000): 207–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/0958305001500022.
Full textSteele, Jenny. "Private law and the environment: nuisance in context." Legal Studies 15, no. 2 (July 1995): 236–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.1995.tb00061.x.
Full textViscusi, W. Kip. "Compensating Workplace Toxic Torts." Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science 37, no. 1 (1988): 126. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1174059.
Full textMarchant, Gary E. "Toxicogenomics and toxic torts." Trends in Biotechnology 20, no. 8 (August 2002): 329–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7799(02)01992-3.
Full textShanker, Howard M. "Hormesis and toxic torts." Human & Experimental Toxicology 27, no. 2 (February 2008): 117–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327107086566.
Full textMarchant, Gary E. "Hormesis and toxic torts." Human & Experimental Toxicology 27, no. 2 (February 2008): 97–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327107086567.
Full textToris, Russell, David Kent, and Sonia Chernova. "The Robot Management System: A Framework for Conducting Human-Robot Interaction Studies Through Crowdsourcing." Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, no. 2 (June 1, 2014): 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5898/jhri/3.2.toris.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Toxis torts"
Araghi, Susan. "Mass toxic torts : zur Entwicklung des Umwelthaftungsrechts in den USA /." Berlin : Logos, 2004. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=013065474&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
Full textToris, Dimitrios [Verfasser]. "Zur Brandbeanspruchung vertikaler Tragglieder in Personenverkehrsanlagen / Dimitrios Toris." Wuppertal : Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, 2018. http://d-nb.info/1156626080/34.
Full textCatchings, Billy Wayne. "Plaintiff entities, awards, and decision justifications in a toxic tort case." Diss., The University of Arizona, 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185966.
Full textSeyfert, Christian [Verfasser]. "Mass Toxic Torts: Zum Problem der kausalen Unaufklärbarkeit toxischer Massenschäden. : Eine rechtsvergleichende und interdisziplinäre Studie. / Christian Seyfert." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2011. http://d-nb.info/1238344135/34.
Full textau, J. goodie@murdoch edu, and Jo Goodie. "The Invention of the Environment as a Legal Subject." Murdoch University, 2007. http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20070815.131651.
Full textHarrison, Rebecca Jane. "Scientific evidence and the toxic tort : a socio-legal study of the issues, expert evidence and judgment in Reay and Hope v. British Nuclear Fuels plc." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 1999. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2002/.
Full textKün-Darbois, Daniel. "Remodelage osseux et pathologies oro-faciales." Thesis, Angers, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017ANGE0051/document.
Full textFirst, bone changes at the mandible were studied after a unilateral botulinum toxin (BTX) injection in masticatory muscles in adult rats. A major alveolar and condylar bone loss was evidenced. The occurrence of a hypertrophic bone metaplasia at the digastric muscle enthesis was evidenced as well. This could constitute an etiological factor for tori. Then, condylar articular cartilage changes at the mandible were studied in the same BTX animal model, using microtomography after contrast enhancement of cartilage with uranyl acetate. Cartilage thickness measurement showed no difference when comparing control and BTX groups.A third work studied mandibular tori in human using histologic and microtomographic techniques. Tori appeared different from long bone exostoses by several characteristics (absence of Fe and Al in the bone matrix) and a specific asymmetric bone remodeling was evidenced.The fourth part consisted in the study of alveolar mandibular vascularization and quality of the bonematrix in an animal model of osteonecrosis of the jaws(ONJ) after bisphosphonates (BP) injections. Clinical and microtomographic signs of ONJ were found in mostof the cases. An increased mineralization of the alveolar bone was observed after BP impregnation. Microvascularization was increased after tooth extraction in the alveolar bone of control animals but it was impaired in ZA treated rats. Such an in vivo antiangiogenic effect of BPs could play a role in the pathophysiology of ONJ
CHENG, JUEI-YU, and 鄭瑞瑜. "Personal Injury in Toxic Torts- Focus on Latent Damage." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/hcb9ek.
Full text東吳大學
法律學系
107
The term “toxic tort” has been used by scholars and courts to describe an alleged personal injury and related damages resulted from toxic substances. The particularity of toxic torts lies in the inequality and non-interchangeability of the status of subjects, the large and complex number of victims, the unclear causality, the seriousness of the damage and scientific uncertainty. Because of these characteristics, toxic torts are different from traditional torts. It also stems from the above differences, leading to many unforeseen problems in practice. First, the damage caused by exposure to chronic toxic substances often has a long incubation period. Therefore, if victims have not been clinically harmed with toxic substances but have enhanced risk of serious diseases, whether this kind of “damage” could be recognized and how to compensate them are problems. Secondly, if the victims do not have clinical symptoms, how the causation between the latent damage and exposure to toxicants is determined. In addition, for latent personal injury, when will the statute of limitations start to run? Finally, it is worth clarifying whether these victims can claim again if they are indeed ill in the future. This paper attempts to respond to the above questions through literature analysis, case study, and comparative research. First, in Radioactively Contaminated Rebar case, the Taiwan High Court’s No. 1 judgment (2002) ruled “enhanced risk of diseases” as one of the actual damages, allowing victims to request non-property damages. In the case of dioxin pollution from Anshun plant of China Petrochemical Development Corporation (CPDC), the Supreme Court’s No. 3 Civil Judgment, as well as that of the Taiwan High Court in the RCA case held the same opinion. However, the scope of actual compensation is limited to infringement of the right to physical health due to enhanced risk of diseases and the impaired mental health derived from that. This article considers that in addition to the above-mentioned non-property damage, in order to confirm whether there is clinical diseases after excessive exposure to internationally recognized toxicants, the court should agree to the victims requesting the diagnostic test fee. It is because without exposure to toxicants, the victims are not required to receive the test. For medical monitoring costs, the court must consider the severity of the disease, the appropriate medical tracking tools, the frequency of tracking, and the clear tracking period. The standards established by US states and federal courts are available for reference. Besides, if the pollution was severe and made areas uninhabitable, the feasor(s) should also compensate for the resettlement costs. Secondly, in the determination of causation, if there is empirical evidence that the toxicants had a causal relationship with known serious diseases, the causal relationship should be related to the latent damage caused by the exposure of the same one. In addition, the long-term statute of limitations is adjusted from the time when the victims “reasonably know the damage”. Finally, when the latent damage is apparent, the apparent disease should be regarded as another new damage that is not affected by the previous judgment.
MIN-YENLEE and 李明燕. "A Research on Environmental Toxic Torts and Risk Distribution Mechanism." Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/2p752k.
Full text國立成功大學
法律學系
105
When environmental toxin jeopardizes the health of citizens through ambient medium, although the state institute them the right of legal proceedings, the whole process takes a long time. Moreover, in civil law system the right to claim has statutes of limitations and the plaintiffs bear more burden of proof of causation, as a result, whether such right is sufficient to protect citizens is doubtful. In this thesis, we want to explore how we can improve it. In this thesis, we will look into the law suits of Sinopec An-shun factory and RCA pollution incident and observe interactions between courts, the plaintiffs and defendant in the civil first instance verdict. We will analyze the court’s attitudes in causality、statutes of limitations、compensation and streamline the involved issues and the discrepancies in the science of construction of law. Through these two cases, we explore the various difficulties that victims encountered and how the state should manifest its obligation of protecting citizen’s rights. We conclude the state should impose Compulsory liability insurance and establish Compensation Fund Legalization to effectively protect citizen’s right.
Mao, Jing-chau, and 毛景超. "A Study on Toxic Tort Causation." Thesis, 2008. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/358vrx.
Full text東吳大學
法律學系
96
【Abstract】 Due to careless attitude towards wastes treatment by the authorities for a long period of time, Taiwan had been subject to insufficient treatment facilities for various wastes. As a result, the wastes seriously contaminated our environment. In 2000, the Control Yuan issued the 20th impeachment statement which revealed a shocking fact to public. That is, prior to 2000, every year nearly 670 thousands tons of industrial hazardous wastes were out of control and not aware by any authorities. It is believed that the wastes has been widely illegally dumped all over this island. Consequently the toxicants contained in hazardous wastes have resulted in damage and increased risk in future to the people. Toxic torts litigations gradually come up more frequently. We can expect toxic cases will be increased significantly in future as well. Recently the first personal injury of toxic torts litigation is in the court for trial. That is soil and underground water contamination episode in RCA site. It is likely to have more cases later. The hardest part for toxic tort case is the proof of causation. The reasons which make causation problem as extreme difficulty in toxic tort case are summarized as follows: (1)There are multiple factors and each of them has the capability to make persons to contract a same kind of disease. (2)The formation of cancers and other rare diseases are still not all clearly as to date. (3)The latency for disease caused by toxicant is one of the prominent characteristics for plaintiffs in toxic tort case. (4) The causes how toxicants produce damage to victims highly depend on scientific evidence and experts testimony. Sometimes advance technologies are required to introduce for investigation. It is almost not possible to establish causal link between claimed facts and damages, until completely clarify the previously mentioned points. Taiwan judicial system has not experience as many cases as well-developed countries pertaining to toxic tort. Therefore, it is a feasible way that learn relevant experience from these countries. US used to suffer extensive environmental pollution issues, and gained lots of experience on conducting toxic torts litigation. These experiences are worth of being learned. So the purpose of this study is to learn from existing experience of US including basic theory of causation and damage, and use it as a reference to see if the toxic torts litigation can be managed properly in Taiwan. The study starts with the causation in the toxic tort litigation, namely factual cause and legal cause. Subsequently this study discusses the vital elements, which can be applied to make judgment for the establishment of causation. Then discussion turns on the question for distinguishing causation in the environmental regulations from that of toxic tort litigation, and generally introduces environmental regulations in both Taiwan and US. Next, the introduction of liability theories and scope of damages are in sequence. Further, the study delineates the establishment of causation between liabilities and damage for both theoretical and practical aspects. To get better understanding on causation, the study also collected and analyzed recent toxic tort cases. Finally the study makes both conclusions for the finding during the research and suggestions for resolving difficulties encountered in toxic tort cases.
Books on the topic "Toxis torts"
Unbekannte Klägerfälle im amerikanischen Umwelthaftungsrecht: Das anonyme Opfer : Aufgabe und Chance für ein neues Haftungsmodell. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1993.
Find full textO'Reilly, James T. Toxic torts practice guide. 2nd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1992.
Find full textO'Reilly, James T. Toxic torts practice guide. 2nd ed. [St. Paul, MN]: Thomson/West, 2005.
Find full textCetrulo, Lawrence G. Toxic torts litigation guide. [St. Paul, Minn.]: Thomson/West, 2002.
Find full textEggen, Jean Macchiaroli. Toxic torts in a nutshell. 2nd ed. St. Paul, Minn: West Group, 2000.
Find full textEggen, Jean Macchiaroli. Toxic torts in a nutshell. St. Paul, Minn: West Pub. Co., 1995.
Find full textEggen, Jean Macchiaroli. Toxic torts in a nutshell. St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2015.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Toxis torts"
Gavin, William P., Mark A. Love, and Wendie A. Howland. "Evaluating Toxic Tort Cases." In Legal Nurse Consulting Principles and Practices, 321–44. 4th edition. | Abingdon, Oxon [UK] ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429283642-14.
Full textMorewitz, Stephen J. "Sociological Theory and Methods in Toxic Tort Lawsuits." In Handbook of Forensic Sociology and Psychology, 281–304. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7178-3_21.
Full textJablon, Seymour. "The Probability of Causation: An Approach to the Problem of Toxic Torts, Especially with Respect to Exposures to Ionizing Radiation." In Epidemiology and Quantitation of Environmental Risk in Humans from Radiation and Other Agents, 47–62. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9445-1_4.
Full textSnyder, Jack W. "Toxic Torts." In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 213–28. Elsevier, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-369400-0/00961-3.
Full textGold, S. C., and M. D. Green. "Toxic Torts." In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 770–90. Elsevier, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386454-3.00993-3.
Full text"Toxic Torts." In Forensic Toxicology, 218–39. CRC Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b11541-25.
Full text"Toxic Torts." In Taking Back the Academy!, 117–26. Routledge, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203339589-14.
Full text"Toxic Tort." In MATERIAL WITNESS. The MIT Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9953.003.0008.
Full textBenson, Bruce L. "Toxic Torts by Government." In Cutting Green Tape, 83–98. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351289443-4.
Full text"Toxic Torts in Retrospect." In Expert Witnessing and Scientific Testimony, 63–66. CRC Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b18731-13.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Toxis torts"
Johari, Ridhima, and Mudit Dubey. "A Savior before the Spill: Toxic Tort under Environmental Laws." In 2nd Annual International Conference on Law, Regulations and Public Policy (LRPP 2013). Global Science and Technology Forum Pte Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2251-3809_lrpp13.17.
Full textGansel, Lars C., Siri Rackebrandt, Frode Oppedal, and Thomas A. McClimans. "Flow Fields Inside Stocked Fish Cages and the Near Environment." In ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. ASMEDC, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/omae2011-50205.
Full textReports on the topic "Toxis torts"
Guinn, H., and D. Remson. TORIS Data Preparation Guidelines. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/4167.
Full textEnhancement of the TORIS data base of Appalachian basin oil fields. Final report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/251348.
Full text