Academic literature on the topic 'Trademark licences'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Trademark licences.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Trademark licences"
Vereen, Endia. "Trademark Protection in Bankruptcy Proceedings: A Closer Look at Lubrizol and its Progeny." Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law and Policy 15, no. 1 (February 10, 2015): 57–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/tlp.2014.156.
Full textZenker, Ilona. "KNOWLEDGE BEYOND BORDERS." KNOWLEDGE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 30, no. 1 (March 20, 2019): 273–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.35120/kij3001273z.
Full textSujatmiko, Agung. "KETERKAITAN PERJANJIAN LISENSI MERK DENGAN PERJANJIAN WARALABA DAN DISTRIBUSI." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 40, no. 4 (December 3, 2010): 537. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol40.no4.230.
Full textГутников, Олег, Olyeg Gutnikov, Валерия Смирнова, and Valeriya Smirnova. "On Soviet Trade Marks." Journal of Russian Law 3, no. 1 (December 24, 2014): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/7250.
Full textYustisia, Fasya, and Catharina Ria Budiningsih. "PENGALIHAN HAK MEREK MELALUI WAKAF BERDASARKAN HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA DAN PRINSIP SYARIAH." Veritas et Justitia 5, no. 2 (December 27, 2019): 329–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.25123/vej.3616.
Full textda Silva Lopes, Teresa, and Mark Casson. "Brand Protection and the Globalization of British Business." Business History Review 86, no. 2 (2012): 287–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007680512000414.
Full textIntan Puspanita and Danny Septriadi. "Evaluation of Fairness of Trademarks Royalty Prices in Transfer Pricing Transactions (Case Study of PT X Court Decisions)." JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial 3, no. 1 (March 28, 2021): 27–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.51486/jbo.v3i1.52.
Full textŽelvys, Arūnas. "Neišimtinės prekių ženklo licencinės sutarties licenciato teisinės padėties ypatumai." Teisė 71 (January 1, 2009): 163–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/teise.2009.0.290.
Full textNur, Amirul Mohammad. "IMPOR PARALEL DALAM HUKUM MEREK INDONESIA." Yuridika 30, no. 2 (August 23, 2017): 201. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v30i2.4660.
Full textAndroshchuk, Hennadii. "Сombating unfair registrations and using means of individualization in the conditions of digital transformation." Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property, no. 6 (June 16, 2021): 120–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.33731/62020.234053.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Trademark licences"
Lášková, Tereza. "Obchodní a právní aspekty ochranné známky v oblasti bezlepkových výrobků." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-150110.
Full textŽelvys, Arūnas. "Problems of Trademark Licensing." Doctoral thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2011. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2011~D_20110222_154716-87464.
Full textDisertacijoje nagrinėjami prekių ženklo licencinės sutarties probleminiai aspektai, egzistuojantys licencinės sutarties sudarymo, jos galiojimo ir pasibaigimo metu. Probleminiai aspektai darbe suprantami kaip sutartį reglamentuojančių teisės normų aiškinimo atvejai, kuriems esant bendrąsias ir specialiąsias teisės normas būtina aiškinti atsižvelgiant į sutarties objekto (teisės į prekių ženklą) specifiką. Probleminiai aspektai yra sąlygojami dviejų priežasčių: neišsamaus licencinės sutarties reglamentavimo ir sui generis sutarties pobūdžio. Tai aspektai, susiję su sutarties registracija prekių ženklų registre, su sutarties šalių teisiniu statusu, su teise į prekių ženklą (jos galiojimu ar modifikavimu), šios teisės perdavimu, konkurencijos teise, licencinės sutarties atribojimu nuo kitų sutarčių ir bei kiti probleminiai aspektai. Darbe daromos išvados, jog prekių ženklų licencinių sutarčių registracijos sistema neatitinka šiuolaikinės teisės tendencijų ir licencinės sutarties registracijos kaip sąlygos sutartį panaudoti prieš trečiuosius asmenis turėtų būti atsisakyta, tačiau paliekant galimybę registruoti sutartį vienos iš sutarties šalių valia; siūloma išplėsti neišimtinio licenciato teisės kreiptis į teismą ribas; pažymima, kad licenciato veiksmai ginčijant jam licencijuojamą ženklą remiantis absoliučiais ženklo negaliojimo pagrindais ar dėl ženklo nenaudojimo neturėtų būti laikomi savaime nesąžiningais; licenciaro atliekamos kokybės kontrolės licencinėje sutartyje... [toliau žr. visą tekstą]
Cowan, Donald C. "Operations manual for use in the Office of Licensing and Trademark Administration at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University." Master's thesis, Virginia Tech, 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41825.
Full textŠístková, Michaela. "Ochranné známky a licenční smlouvy k ochranným známkám." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2008. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-16108.
Full textCowan, Donald C. "Operating manual for use in the Office of Liscensing and Trademark Administration at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University /." This resource online, 1992. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03302010-020235/.
Full textCarneiro, Thiago Jabur. "Contribuição ao estudo do contrato de licença de uso de marca." Universidade de São Paulo, 2011. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2132/tde-03092012-105804/.
Full textThe scope of this thesis is the analysis of the Trademark License Agreement in the light of Law 9.279/96 (Brazilian Industrial Property Law) and the Civil Code of 2002, as well as the legal consequences arising therefrom, especially under the national legal system. This work equally indicates that the agreement under review requires further investigation on the principles and provisions of general contract law rooted in civil code in force, given its complexity and wide range of institutes of Civil and Commercial Law, as well as indissoluble economic elements of the legal reality which permeates it. The topics that limit the orbit of the Trademark License Agreement are objects of this study and are, therefore, essential for the understanding and critical analysis of the institute, for which we will also run over the international law and comparative jurisprudence. In the wake of the goals of the current thesis, it is intended to proceed with the examination of legislative, doctrinal and jurisprudential developments with regard to the juridical instrument under consideration. Debates concerning the new trends in treatment of the subject under the International and Brazilian Law are also mentioned, especially in relation to the application of the general principles of Contract Law and other regulations established by the current Civil Code, in which there was the amalgamation of the Obligation Law. The demarcation of the civil principles applicable to the Trademark License Agreements still remains pending consolidation in Brazil, due to the newly and still embryonic civil legislation, as may be largely understood from this study. Finally, in accordance with the social function principle, there is recommendation in order to rewrite an article set forth by the current trademark law, with the aim to harmonize the modified article with the afore said principle.
Török, David. "Licenční smlouva v mezinárodním obchodě." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2009. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-11087.
Full textMarčík, Petr. "Uvedení amerického výrobku na český a celosvětový trh a jeho právní ochrana." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-201806.
Full textJurášová, Monika. "Vztah známkoprávní a autorskoprávní ochrany v českém právu." Master's thesis, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-307041.
Full textLiu, Yu-Yu, and 劉宥妤. "A Comparative Study on the Effect of Registration for Trademark and Patent Licenses." Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/yn5v99.
Full text國立臺灣大學
科際整合法律學研究所
107
Under our current law system, according to the Article 62 of Patent Act ” The licensing of a pledge on a patent right by the patentee shall have no locus standi against any third party unless it is recorded with the Specific Patent Agency” and the Article 39 of Trademark Act” A license shall have no locus standi against any third party unless it is entered in the Register by the Registrar Office,” patent licensing and trademark licensing adopts registration antagonism. R.O.C. Civil Code pursues the principle of formalism, which means alteration of real rights cannot come into effect unless public notification(delivery or registration). However, patent licensing and trademark licensing adopts the system of registration antagonism which is founded on consensualism. According to consensualism, alteration of real rights needs only consensus of contract parties, and the form of public notification is not a constitutive requirement. In the mode of registration antagonism, if one person has obtained the ownership of some patent or trademark right without registration, then another person also takes the opportunity to grant this license with registration, finally the controversy about the ownership of the items between two people would appear. It turns out to be difficult to explain the circumstances of multiple licenses under the principle of formalism, and give rise to disputes regarding the legal effect of licensing registration antagonism. According to Article 177 of Japanese Civil Code, acquisitions of, losses of and changes in real rights concerning immovable properties may not be asserted against third parties, unless the same are registered pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Real Estate Registration Act and other laws regarding registration. In Japan, as typical countries adopting the consensualism and registration antagonism system, it should be understood that the ownership of a property has not just transferred once, so as to justify multiple transactions. Under the circumstances of multiple licenses, the right to use the license should coexist without registration. In light of the fact that the doctrine of registration antagonism has been widely discussed in Japan for years, this dissertation attempts to examine the development of the doctrine of registration antagonism in the academy, and to provide a patent(trademark) licensing registration mode to apply to the whole intellectual property system, as a reference of the academic discussion and its application in courts.
Books on the topic "Trademark licences"
Angriffsmöglichkeiten des Lizenznehmers auf den Lizenzgegenstand: Marken und Patente. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1998.
Find full textAbdulai, Taiwo &. Co. Registration of trade marks, patents & technology transfer licences. Lagos: Abdulai, Taiwo & Co.; Solicitors, 1999.
Find full textSánchez, Antonio Roncero. El contrato de licencia de marca. Madrid: Civitas, 1999.
Find full textICC Commission on Commercial Law and Practice, ed. ICC model international trademark licence. Paris: International Chamber of Commerce, 2008.
Find full textNihon Kokusai Chiteki Zaisan Hogo Kyōkai. Kokusai Hōsei Kenkyūshitsu. Ajia shokoku no shōhyō seido unʼyō ni kansuru chōsa kenkyū hōkokusho. Tōkyō: Nihon Kokusai Chiteki Zaisan Hogo Kyōkai [Kokusai Hōsei Kenkyūshitsu], 2003.
Find full textShang biao he tong pan li: Shangbiao hetong panli. Beijing Shi: Zhi shi chan quan chu ban she, 2010.
Find full textShang biao he tong pan li: Shangbiao hetong panli. Beijing Shi: Zhi shi chan quan chu ban she, 2010.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Trademark licences"
"Royalty-Free Trademark License Agreement." In The IT Digital Legal Companion, 695–703. Elsevier, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-59749-256-0.00034-5.
Full text"Royalty Bearing Trademark License Agreement." In The IT Digital Legal Companion, 705–15. Elsevier, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-59749-256-0.00035-7.
Full textGrubb, Philip W., Peter R. Thomsen, Tom Hoxie, and Gordon Wright. "Patent Aspects of Licensing." In Patents for Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, and Biotechnology. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199684731.003.0028.
Full textTouil, Chiraz, and Souhaila Kammoun. "Intellectual Property Management by Innovative Firms." In Intellectual Property Rights and the Protection of Traditional Knowledge, 204–38. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1835-9.ch010.
Full textBrown, Jeannette E. "Chemists Who Work for the National Labs or Other Federal Agencies." In African American Women Chemists in the Modern Era. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190615178.003.0009.
Full textBrown, Jeannette. "Industry and Government Labs." In African American Women Chemists. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199742882.003.0009.
Full text"made to the Registrar – that is, the Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks. The application must be filed at the Patent Office, of which the Trade Marks Registry is a part. The application has to contain certain matter set out in the Act: – a request for registration of a trademark; – information about the identity and address of the applicant; – a statement of the goods and/or services for which the applicant wishes to register the mark; and – a representation of the mark. As far as the last of these is concerned, if the mark is just a word or words, not in a particular font, the word is all that has to be stated. If the mark contains pictorial matter, or the word or words is or are depicted in a particular font or script, a representation of the actual mark will be needed. If the mark is something else, such as the shape of the goods or their packaging, music or a smell, there must be a graphical representation of the mark: how this is achieved is up to the applicant. The application must state that the mark is being used for the goods or services for which registration is sought. The use may be by the applicant, or by someone with the applicant’s consent. Alternatively, it suffices if the applicant has a bona fide intention of using the mark: no evidence of such intention needs to be provided, however. This prevents speculative registration of trademarks, which would block the register for anyone seeking protection for a similar mark. There is no need for actual use to precede registration, so a business can register its trademarks as soon as it starts up (or even before). The requirement is not onerous. The applicant merely has to state in the application that the mark is in use or that it has a bona fide intention of using it. No further details are needed. The form TM3 which must be completed by or on behalf of applicants takes care of this requirement. This provision continues the effect of s 17(1) of the 1938 Act. However, the 1938 Act’s requirement that, where the use of the mark is to be by a company about to be set up or by a licensee, this must be indicated and details provided, has not been re-enacted. The applicant is also required to pay the requisite fees. There is a basic application fee, set initially in 1994 at £225, plus additional class fees of £125 for multi-class applications, allowed for the first time. The pre-1994 application fee was £185, the increase being justified by the increase in the initial term of protection from seven to 10 years." In Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law, 650. Routledge-Cavendish, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843142928-112.
Full text"While the Treaty does not affect the existence of intellectual property rights, there are nonetheless circumstances in which the exercise of such rights may be restricted by the prohibitions laid down in the treaty. 2. Article 36 permits exceptions to the free movement of goods only to the extent to which such exceptions are necessary for the purpose of safeguarding the rights that constitute the specific subject-matter of the type of intellectual property in question. Perhaps the main advantage of this formula, apart from the fact that it narrows the scope of the exceptions permitted by Article 36, is that it allows subtle distinctions to be made depending on the type of intellectual property in issue. 3. The exclusive right conferred on the owner of intellectual property is exhausted in relation to the products in question when he puts them into circulation anywhere within the Common Market. Spelt out more fully, ‘the proprietor of an industrial or commercial property right protected by the legislation of a Member State may not rely on that legislation in order to oppose the importation of a product which has lawfully been marketed in another Member State by, or with the consent of, the proprietor of the right himself or person legally or economically dependent on him’. The expression ‘industrial and commercial property’ clearly embraces patents and trademarks. It also extends to such specialised areas as plant breeders’ rights. The court has held that copyright can also be a form of industrial or commercial property because it ‘includes the protection conferred by copyright, especially when exploited commercially in the form of licences capable of affecting distribution in the various Member States of goods incorporating the protected literary or artistic work’. The principle that the Treaty does not affect the existence of industrial and commercial property rights is derived from Article 222 of the treaty. This provides that ‘the treaty shall in no way prejudice the rules in Member States governing the system of property ownership’. Consequently intellectual property rights are unaffected by the provisions of the treaty unless they hinder free movement or offend the rules of competition. In Keurkoop v Nancy Kean (see below) the design of a handbag which was manufactured in Taiwan was registered in the Benelux countries but without the authority of the actual author. In Case 78/70, Deutsche Grammophon v Metro-SB Grossmärkte [1971] ECR 487, [1971] CMLR 631, the European Court stated:." In Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law, 110–14. Routledge-Cavendish, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843142928-23.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Trademark licences"
Odintsov, S. V., and M. Mansour. "Trademarks’ License Agreement Based on a Smart Contract." In 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Management Trends and the Digital Economy: from Regional Development to Global Economic Growth” (MTDE 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200502.036.
Full text