Academic literature on the topic 'Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement"
Gao, Henry. "The Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement: A Critical Analysis." Legal Issues of Economic Integration 37, Issue 3 (August 1, 2010): 221–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/leie2010017.
Full text민경식. "A Study on Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement." Journal of International Trade & Commerce 7, no. 4 (December 2011): 255–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.16980/jitc.7.4.201112.255.
Full textCzesław Kozłowski, Stanisław. "Economic and Strategic Determinants of The Trans-Pacific Partnership." Athenaeum Polskie Studia Politologiczne 4, no. 44 (December 31, 2014): 101–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/athena.2014.44.06.
Full textTung, Genevieve. "International Trade Law and Information Policy: A Recent History." International Journal of Legal Information 42, no. 2 (2014): 241–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0731126500012051.
Full textZhu, Zihao,. "The Strategic Shift of U.S. Economic Framework Toward Asia Pacific: From TPP to IPEF." Communications in Humanities Research 23, no. 1 (December 20, 2023): 134–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/23/20230862.
Full textKostyunina, G. M. "Trans-Pacific Strategic Partnership: the Balance of Power and Role in the Formation of Regional Free Trade Area in Asia- Pacific." MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 4(25) (August 28, 2012): 94–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2012-4-25-94-100.
Full textBiegon, Rubrick. "US Hegemony and the Trans-Pacific Partnership: Consensus, Crisis, and Common Sense." Chinese Journal of International Politics 13, no. 1 (2020): 69–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poaa001.
Full textLim, Chin Leng. "East Asia’s Engagement with Cosmopolitan Ideals Under its Trade Treaty Dispute Provisions." McGill Law Journal 56, no. 4 (September 13, 2011): 821–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1005847ar.
Full textKuźnar, Andżelika, and Jerzy Brunon Menkes. "EU-Japan Agreements: Content, Context and Implications." Review of European and Comparative Law 39, no. 4 (July 7, 2020): 7–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.31743/recl.4839.
Full textMatera, Paulina. "China as the Strategic Competitor in the Debate on TPP in the United States." International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 22, no. 1 (November 9, 2018): 85–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.22.06.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement"
Toglo, Amévi. "Accords de Partenariat Trans Pacifique et secteur laitier canadien : analyse des impacts économiques." Master's thesis, Université Laval, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/28358.
Full textPending the possible implementation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), the protocol of which was signed at the autumn 2015, we have analyzed its economic impacts using a partial equilibrium model on the supply-managed Canadian dairy sector. The issue was addressed in terms of tariff liberalization with a minimum access increase per tariff line. Using the short-term scenarios (no adjustments) and long-term scenarios (reduction of the national marketing quota), we analyzed the implications of the TPP for the welfare of the various actors in the sector, inputs and outputs and the quantities offered and consumed. The results show a decrease in the domestic price and the quantity offered of the input as well as a net increase in general short-term and long-term welfare of 0.3% and 0.7%, respectively. -- Keywords: dairy sector, tariff liberalization, minimum access, supply management, Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP).
CERQUEIRA, Wanilza Marques de Almeida. "Patentes farmacêuticas no período pós-trips: uma análise do Tratado Transpacífico no contexto da mudança na governança em relação ao comércio internacional e da implementação da Agenda 2030 para o desenvolvimento sustentável." Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2017. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/25397.
Full textApproved for entry into archive by Alice Araujo (alice.caraujo@ufpe.br) on 2018-08-03T22:33:55Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) TESE Wanilza Marques de Almeida Cerqueira.pdf: 1447437 bytes, checksum: f7d3931db192530d559e27571f5e66d8 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-03T22:33:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) TESE Wanilza Marques de Almeida Cerqueira.pdf: 1447437 bytes, checksum: f7d3931db192530d559e27571f5e66d8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-10
A tese tem como objetivo estudar os efeitos dos mega-acordos comerciais, especificamente do Tratado Transpacífico (TPP) em relação às patentes farmacêuticas e, consequentemente, no acesso a medicamentos. O estudo foi realizado através de pesquisa bibliográfica e legislativa e culmina com a comparação entre TPP e TRIPS. O estudo será focado no período pós-TRIPS, no qual a governança do comércio internacional passa por grandes transformações e a regulamentação da propriedade intelectual fora do âmbito da OMC cresce, cada vez mais, com a formulação de regras consideradas TRIPS-plus e TRIPS-extra. Esta realidade do período pós-TRIPS pode afetar a função social da propriedade intelectual e torná-la um óbice para o desenvolvimento econômico. A implementação da agenda 2030 para o desenvolvimento sustentável exige solidariedade global através da cooperação internacional, envolve o debate multilateral do comércio internacional centrado na OMC e a facilitação da transferência de tecnologia. O debate multilateral e mais democrático sobre temas atinentes ao comércio internacional, propiciado pela OMC, está ameaçado.
The thesis aims to study the effects of trade mega-agreements, specifically the Transpacific Treaty (TPP) on pharmaceutical patents and, consequently, on access to medicines. The study was carried out through bibliographical and legislative research and culminates in the comparison between TPP and TRIPS. The study will focus on the post-TRIPS period in which international trade governance undergoes major transformations and the regulation of intellectual property outside the WTO is increasingly being developed by the formulation of TRIPS-plus and TRIPS- extra. This reality of the post-TRIPS period can affect the social function of intellectual property and make it an obstacle to economic development. Implementing the 2030 agenda for sustainable development requires global solidarity through international cooperation, involves the multilateral debate on international trade centered on the WTO and facilitating technology transfer. The multilateral and more democratic debate on issues related to international trade, provided by the WTO, is threatened.
Heyliger, Joseph. "The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and the Changing Face of Free Trade Agreements: The Resultant Social, Political, and Economic Consequences." ScholarWorks, 2018. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/5475.
Full textChen, Yun-Ju, and 陳韻如. "The meaning of Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement in Abenomics-take agriculture as the foundation." Thesis, 2015. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5gc4qz.
Full text淡江大學
亞洲研究所碩士班
103
The purpose of the study is to understand the background and the reason why Japan joining the TPP under the Abenomics. In addition, finding out the meaning of the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement(TPP)in Abenomics according to the experience of TPP US-Japan agricultural talks in 2014. Signing free trade agreements is neither a subjective question of right and wrong nor a presence of justice and morality. It is totally a offense and defense negotiation based on national economy and people''s livelihood between contracting parties. Therefore, the essence of free trade agreements is to find a mutually beneficial balance between contracting parties. The core of the negotiation of free trade agreements is all about national economy and people''s livelihood. In this study, we cited every livelihood data of Japan after Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe came into power the second time, and compare the difference of the budget planned by the ministry of agriculture, forestry and fisheries of Japan between 2013 and 2014. Thereby, inspecting the policy achievements of Shinzo Abe and agricultural deployment of Japan after joining TPP. Conclusions 1.The regional trade organization mode of national economy has already brought out an serious issue that Japan has to face under the condition of competing economic policy strategies:joining the TPP and negotiating with other parties. 2.Multilateral free trade agreements have fully demonstrated the function of integration. The Japan-ASEAN FTA have done that, and TPP is no exception. In addition to agricultural products and tariff issues, another key issue in the TPP talks is to find out how to restructure a new integration platform between the US and Japan. 3.Japan not only joined the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership in 2013 and leaned closer to US-led economic organizations, but also looked forward to protect its agriculture framework to a certain extent by TPP from the perspective of Abenomics. Overall, the meaning of the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreemen(TPP)in Abenomics is participating in the TPP is enough to touch the new economic growth strategy, and Japan should strengthen its own industrial revolution through the involvement of the TPP.
Chao, Chien-Yang, and 趙健揚. "The Economic Impacts of Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership on Taiwan." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/89f9z8.
Full text國立臺灣大學
經濟學研究所
107
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has been negotiated for ten years, and signed by nations from all over the world, including Australia, United States, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. Its pursue of high quality and standards makes it a paragon for all its contemporary counterparts. In January 2017, Donald J. Trump, the new President of the United States, signed an executive order withdrawing the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The rest of the eleven countries decided to reach an agreement and continued without the United States. After that, they signed a new free-trade deal called Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). Taiwan has developed close trade relationship with the nations mentioned above, and in order to survive in the fierce competition of international trading, we have been trying hard to be a part of the agreement in recent years. This paper uses GTAP model to analyze the possible effects of Taiwan joining CPTPP. Research results show that our country might gain positive GDP growth by taking part in the agreement, but also bring negative impact to some industries.
Huang, Yu-Jung, and 黃裕容. "The Possibility of Taiwan to Participate in Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: A SWOT Analysis." Thesis, 2015. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/4mrr42.
Full text國立中正大學
戰略暨國際事務研究所
103
Since the United States adjusted their foreign policy and declared that it will be “Pacific Century” in next 10 years in 2011. Asia-Pacific region returned to the spotlight of international community. Among all the Pacific issues, Asia’s regional economic integration is the greatest concern of the global society. In order to achieve the vision of Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP), there are two different approaches to liberalization. One is Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP); the other is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). RCEP mainly comprises China, ASEAN, and the “ASEAN+1” countries. By contrast, the TPP consist of the United States and intercontinental countries, but at present does not going to have the regional power-China. Consequently, the TPP literally poses challenge to existing Asian power structure. For Taiwan, both regional free trade agreements may be able to serve a range of goals. These include: economic growth, increasing exports etc. Therefore, it’s important for us to strive to participate in any one of the agreement. This study presents a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis for the understanding of Taiwan’s internal situation and external environment. It’s hoped that the study could provide a good overview of the complex regional circumstances.
Yu, Meng-Han, and 游孟涵. "The Economic Impact Evaluation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement(TPP)on Taiwan''s Participation." Thesis, 2014. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/40552096977290040110.
Full textBooks on the topic "Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement"
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Opportunities and challenges : hearing before the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session, April 24, 2013. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Subcommittee on Trade. Trans-Pacific partnership: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Trade of the Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, first session, December 14, 2011. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2012.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Advancing U.S. economic interests in Asia: Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, first session, May 14, 2015. Washington: U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2015.
Find full textauthor, Zhou Zheng, ed. Ya Tai he zuo yu Zhongguo can yu quan qiu jing ji zhi li. Shanghai: Shanghai ren min chu ban she, 2015.
Find full textSun, Yuhong. Duo guo bo yi shi jiao xia TPP tan pan yin fa de zheng ce hu dong he Zhongguo de zhan lüe xuan ze. Beijing: Dui wai jing ji mao yi da xue chu ban she, 2014.
Find full textVoon, Tania. Trade liberalisation and international co-operation: A legal analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013.
Find full textSun, Yuhong. Nan bei xing zi you mao yi xie ding fei mao yi wen ti yan hua qu shi he Zhongguo de dui ce. Beijing: Zhongguo she hui ke xue chu ban she, 2015.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Outlook and opportunities : hearing before the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session, August 1, 2013. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Offfice, 2013.
Find full textTashiro, Yōichi. TPP mondai no shinkyokumen: Tomenakereba naranai koredake no riyū. Tōkyō: Ōtsuki Shoten, 2012.
Find full textChong-dŏk, Kim. TPP chuyoguk t'uja, sŏbisŭ changbyŏk punsŏk: Kich'egyŏl hyŏpchŏngmun mit yanghŏ punsŏk ŭl chungsim ŭro = An analysis on the Services Trade Agreements of the TPP members. Sejong T'ŭkpyŏl Chach'isi: Taeoe Kyŏngje Chŏngch'aek Yŏn'guwŏn, 2014.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement"
Li, Chien-Pin. "US-China Economic Relations: Implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership." In The US Strategic Pivot to Asia and Cross-Strait Relations, 135–56. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137360779_8.
Full textKelsey, Jane. "The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: A Battleground for Competing Hegemons?" In Free Trade Agreements, 11–34. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3038-4_2.
Full textTripathy, Sunita. "The Human Right to Health: Reflecting on the Implications of IPRs as Endorsed by the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement." In International Economic Law, 61–78. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44645-5_4.
Full textYang, Chung-Han. "Cross-Border Energy Investment, Energy Justice and International Economic Law." In Just Transitions, 41–48. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46282-5_7.
Full textMalone, David M. "The Uncertain Geo-Strategic Outlook for the US in Asia: The Pivot, the Re-Balance, TPP, and Now What?" In Megaregulation Contested, 61–78. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198825296.003.0003.
Full text"5. STRATEGIC ROLE OF THE MEGA-TRADE DEALS." In The Political Economy of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreements, 33–45. ISEAS Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1355/9789814519779-007.
Full textErmeydan, Burcu. "Overlapping Regionalism in East Asia: A Critical Review on Mega-Free Trade Agreements." In Rethinking Asia in World Politics. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8331-310-8.08.
Full textMajchrowska, Elżbieta. "Proliferation of RTAs in the World Economy as a Consequence of the Crisis within the WTO – the Case of Agreements between the EU and ASEAN Countries." In Rethinking Asia in World Politics. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8331-310-8.07.
Full textDavis, Christina L. "Japan: Interest Group Politics, Foreign Policy Linkages, and TPP." In Megaregulation Contested, 573–91. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198825296.003.0026.
Full textRazzaq, Abdur. "Regional Trade Deal with China for a New Digital Economy." In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, 132–45. BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/9789815123227123010012.
Full textReports on the topic "Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement"
Park, Cyn-Young, Peter A. Petri, and Michael G. Plummer. Economic Implications of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership for Asia and the Pacific. Asian Development Bank, October 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/wps210371-2.
Full textWei, Shang-Jin, and Xinding Yu. Characterizing Regionalism in Asia: A Modern Global Supply Chain Perspective. Asian Development Bank, September 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/wps220377-2.
Full textChepeliev, Maksym, Wally Tyner, and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe. How Differing Trade Policies May Impact U.S. Agriculture: The Potential Economic Impacts of TPP, USMCA, and NAFTA. GTAP Working Paper, November 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/gtap.wp84.
Full textDavis, Eric C., Ethan Sabala, Dylan Russell, and Jayson Beckman. Impact of recent trade agreements on Japan's pork market. Washington, D.C.: USDA Economic Research Service, May 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2023.8023699.ers.
Full text