To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Tugan‑Baranovsky.
Journal articles on the topic 'Tugan‑Baranovsky'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Tugan‑Baranovsky.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Allisson, François. "Tugan‑Baranovsky and the West." Russian Journal of Economics 7, no. 1 (2021): 19–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.7.55686.
Full textAbstract:
Mikhail Tugan‑Baranovsky was one of the most prolific Russian economists at the turn of the 19–20th centuries. His thought was largely influenced by Western ideas, like most of his fellow Russian economists. But Tugan‑Baranovsky’s theories in turn also influenced Western economic thought to an unprecedented extent. Tugan‑Baranovsky’s Western legacy is first reflected on, before we examine the West’s reception of two of his works: “Industrial crises in England” (1894) and “Theoretical foundations of Marxism” (1905). We compare the conception of these works vis-à-vis their intended audience, and their reception in the international context of the circulation of ideas, so as to define Tugan‑Baranovsky’s relationship with the West.
2
Allisson, François. "Tugan‑Baranovsky and the West." Russian Journal of Economics 7, no. (1) (2021): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.7.55686.
Full textAbstract:
Mikhail Tugan‑Baranovsky was one of the most prolific Russian economists at the turn of the 19–20<sup>th</sup> centuries. His thought was largely influenced by Western ideas, like most of his fellow Russian economists. But Tugan‑Baranovsky's theories in turn also influenced Western economic thought to an unprecedented extent. Tugan‑Baranovsky's Western legacy is first reflected on, before we examine the West's reception of two of his works: "Industrial crises in England" (1894) and "Theoretical foundations of Marxism" (1905). We compare the conception of these works vis-à-vis their intended audience, and their reception in the international context of the circulation of ideas, so as to define Tugan‑Baranovsky's relationship with the West.
3
Nazarova, Irina. "Conjuncture Theory of Money and Industrial Crises by M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky." Moscow University Economics Bulletin 2020, no. 4 (2020): 243–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.38050/013001052020412.
Full textAbstract:
The article investigates the conceptual provisions of the theory of industrial crises of M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky, which marked the shift of emphasis from the analysis of exogenous factors to the in-depth study of on-farm phenomena of economic instability. Mechanisms and levels of pricing are revealed. The role of monetary instruments of market regulation and the influence of state monetary policy at the moment of transition from the “fake” recovery to the crisis are revealed. The “monetary version” of the phenomenon of the “price revolution” by M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky as a function of the transformation of the economic system is shown. The article traces the development of the views of Russian economists (at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries) on the problems of crises. The “conjunctural” theory of money of M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky is considered in the article as a logical conclusion of his theory of cyclic development of economy. The author concludes that the theory of industrial crises and the conjunctural theory of money of M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky characterize the national economy as a multi-level integrated economic system that combines micro-and macroeconomic processes.
4
Adair, Philippe, and Oksana Nezhyvenko. "Tugan-Baranovsky’s Business Cycle Theory and French Economists: Inspiration and Legacy." Scientific Papers NaUKMA. Economics 6, no. 1 (2021): 3–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.18523/2519-4739.2021.6.1.3-7.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of the paper is to emphasize the contribution of Mykhaylo Ivanovych Tugan-Baranovsky to Business Cycle theory and its legacy among French economists.Tugan-Baranovsky (1864–1919), a prominent Ukrainian economist was a cycle theorist who was inspired by some French or francophone economists whose language he mastered. His theory of industrial crises proved influential upon some major economists during the first quarter of the twentieth century until the Great Depression, from Spiethoff to Hayek and Keynes.We present both the history and analytical content of industrial crises in the French version of Tugan-Baranovsky’s masterpiece. We provide an overview of Tugan-Baranovsky’s intellectual legacy as for his French-speaking followers, namely, Lescure, Aftalion, Robertson and Bouniatian. The ebb and tide of Tugan-Baranovsky’s i fluence can be understood throughout two episodes: the shift from real to monetary cycles in the interwar period and the revival of real business cycles alongside New Classical Economics in the 1980s, which proves relevant again in the context of the current Great Lockdown Recession. JEL classіfіcatіon: B14, E32, N13
5
Barnett, Vincent. "Tugan-Baranovsky as a Pioneer of Trade Cycle Analysis." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23, no. 4 (2001): 443–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10427710120096956.
Full textAbstract:
Mikhail Ivanovich Tugan-Baranovsky (1865–1919) has not unjustly been calle the greatest Russian economist of all time (Jasny 1972, p. 159). This neglecte the fact that he was born near Kharkov and towards the end of his life came to see the Ukraine as his homeland, but the evaluation itself is not so far from the truth. However, opinion about the precise importance of Tugan-Baranovsky work to the development of trade cycle analysis has varied widely. J. M. Keynes and A. H. Hansen were both highly respectful of Tugan's contribution. For example, in the Treatise on Money, Keynes wrote in regards to business cycle theory that he was “in strong sympathy with the school of writers … of which Tugan-Baranovski was the first and most original” (Keynes 1930, vol. 2, p. 100 In his 1951 work, Business Cycles and National Income, Hansen was enthusiastic describing Tugan as “cutting his way though the jungle to a new outlook” (Hansen 1951, p. 281). This suggests that some aspects of both British an American Keynesianism might have originated in Tugan's work, or at least bee influenced by it. W. W. Rostow was also impressed by Tugan's approach, statin that it “took business cycle analysis some distance beyond Juglar and Marx” (Rostow 1990, p. 261).
6
Radchenko, Oksana, and Larysa Malik. "Potential of M. Tugan-Baranovsky's cooperative ideas for financing the post-war reconstruction of the agricultural sector." Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni 2024, no. 57 (2024): 141–58. https://doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2024.57.141.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of the research is the state of financing of the agricultural sector in the pre-war and war period of 2013–2022. The topic of the research is an assessment of the potential of individual provisions of the theory of cooperation by M. Tugan-Baranovsky in facilitating the financing of the post-war restoration of the agricultural sector. The goal is to characterize the state of financing of the agricultural sector and the possibility of its improvement for post-war restoration by taking into account the main postulates of the theory of cooperation by M. Tugan-Baranovsky. The study attempts to reveal the potential of cooperative ideas in conjunction with the solution of urgent problems of ensuring the sustainability and diversification of sources of financing for agricultural production. The calculations given are made for enterprises according to code A, KVED-2010. The source base of the research is the works of M. Tugan-Baranovsky and modern scientists studying his legacy. General scientific methods of cognition are used, such as dialectical, systemic, bibliographic methods, analysis and synthesis, and statistical analysis, tabular and graphical generalization. The results of the study include various proposals for the application of individual components of the theory of cooperation for the restoration of the agricultural sector in terms of joint formation of financial resources within industry clusters and the structure of their sources. It is established that in the conditions of war, the theory of agricultural cooperation of M. Tugan-Baranovsky developed by him based on a macroeconomic analysis for small peasant farms, receives favorable conditions for in-depth development in terms of mutual support of agricultural producers, and the formation of value chains with the participation of financial intermediaries, in particular international ones. Thus, production cooperation, supplemented by clusters with financial centers, and targeted financial and resource international assistance will contribute to the implementation of social values of mutual assistance, underlying the cooperative theory. At the same time, all participants in the cooperation process receive their rewards: producers, thanks to support in the form of grants, subsidies, concessional loans, improve their financial condition, the state receives an increase in macro indicators that depend on the condition of the agricultural sector, and international partners receive confidence in the fulfillment of Ukraine's international obligations, and agricultural exports thus supporting the global food security. A possible area of application of the research results is to justify the choice of strategy for the post-war restoration of the agricultural sector in terms of financial regulation based on cooperative principles of activities and human-centric guidelines, which are key in M. Tugan-Baranovsky’s economic theory.
7
Приходько, В. В., and В. В. Приходько. "Marxism in the theoretical heritage of M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky." Industrial Economics, no. 3 (June 30, 2024): 39–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886.2024.3.3.006.
Full textAbstract:
В статье рассмотрено творческое наследие М. И. Туган-Барановского через призму его отношения к теории К. Марса. Выделены особенности мировоззрения ученого, связанные с желанием примерить трудовую теорию стоимости и теорию предельной полезности. Внимание в работе сконцентрировано на дихотомии творческого наследия М. И. Туган-Барановский с отрицательной и положительной критикой К. Маркса: его постепенного перехода от легального марксизма к жесткому оппонированию марксистской теории и опять – к марксизму. This article examines the creative heritage of Mikhail Ivanovich Tugan-Baranovsky through the prism of his attitude to the theory of K. Mars. The features of the scientist’s worldview associated with the desire to try on the labor theory of value and the theory of marginal utility are highlighted. Attention in the work is focused on the dichotomy of the creative heritage of M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky with the “negative” and “positive” criticism of K. Marx: his gradual transition from “legal Marxism” to a harsh opposition to Marxist theory, and again to Marxism.
8
Malygina, V. D., and T. P. Tkachenko. "History lessons." Tovaroved prodovolstvennykh tovarov (Commodity specialist of food products), no. 5 (April 27, 2025): 291–300. https://doi.org/10.33920/igt-01-2505-05.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines the participation of commodity scientists of the Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named after M. Tugan-Baranovsky in the Great Patriotic War and their role in the development of the Department of Commodity Science of Food Products and the School of Scientific Commodity Science.
9
Фомина, М. В., В. В. Приходько, and И. В. Колодяжная. "Contribution of M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky to the development of the russian school of political economy." Industrial Economics, no. 3 (June 30, 2024): 44–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886.2024.3.3.007.
Full textAbstract:
В статье рассмотрен вклад ученого-экономиста М. И. Туган-Барановского в развитие отечественной школы политической экономии. В трудах ученого говорится о всеобщем признании хозяйства как предмета политэкономии, что сводит его только к товарно-денежной форме богатства и результату хозяйственной деятельности, лишает науку возможности многогранного и комплексного исследования социально-экономических отношений. Но, несмотря на ошибочность взглядов на предмет политической экономии, М. И. Туган-Барановский сделал фундаментальный вклад в развитие науки, обосновал невозможность существования внеклассовой политэкономии, отстаивал идею соединения трудовой теории стоимости с теорией предельной полезности, что в дальнейшем получило развитие в теории неоклассического синтеза, выделил различия объективных и субъективных хозяйственных ценностей и рассматривал субъективную ценность как первичную и по праву считается родоначальником российской школы политической экономии. The article examines the contribution of the great scientist and economist M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky to the development of the Russian school of political economy. In the works of M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky, it is said about the universal recognition of the economy as a subject of political economy, which reduces it only to the commodity-money form of wealth and the result of economic activity, deprives science of the possibility of a multifaceted and comprehensive study of socio-economic relations. But, despite the erroneous views on the subject of political economy, M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky made a fundamental contribution to the development of science, among other things, concluded that the existence of a non-class political economy is impossible, defended the idea of combining the labor theory of value with the theory of marginal utility, which was later developed in the theory of neoclassical synthesis, singled out the differences between objective and subjective economic values and considered subjective value as a primary, and is rightfully considered the ancestor of the Russian school of political economy.
10
Kichurchak, Marianna. "Sustainable development for the post-war recovery in Ukraine’s economy: an updated perspective on the scientific legacy of M. Tugan-Baranovsky." Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni 2024, no. 57 (2024): 114–40. https://doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2024.57.114.
Full textAbstract:
The article focuses on reconsidering the scientific ideas and concepts developed by M. Tugan-Baranovsky in economic theory, evaluating their potential to formulate effective strategies for promoting sustainable development principles in the post-war recovery of Ukraine’s economy. The research employs various methodologies such as induction and deduction, comparison, analysis and synthesis. The impact of the war on specific economic and social indicators related to sustainable development is analyzed using cluster analysis. The study emphasizes the importance of considering regional differences in shaping policy initiatives for Ukraine’s economic recovery. These initiatives should be grounded on the principles of sustainability developed in M. Tugan-Baranovsky’s insights on the emergence of new capital, demographic processes, and the evolutionary development of economic entities. The author argues that activities focused on preserving natural resources, achieving social equality, and active implementing new resource-saving technologies are crucial for Ukraine’s post-war economic recovery. The article justifies the feasibility of aligning the objectives of the Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 with Ukraine’s National Recovery Plan, and shows that this conceptual approach is consistent with the scientific framework developed by M. Tugan-Baranovsky. It is concluded that a renewed perspective on the scientific heritage of the renowned Ukrainian economist enables the identification of promising approaches for addressing contemporary economic, environmental, and social challenges, guided by the principles of sustainable development.
11
Allisson, François. "Tugan-Baranovsky on Socialism: From Utopia to the Economic Plan." OEconomia, no. 4-1 (March 1, 2014): 35–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.755.
Full text
12
Sirůček, Pavel. "Half-Forgotten Personalities of Economic Thought - M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky." Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 24, no. 1 (2016): 82–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.aop.500.
Full text
13
Горощенко, В. В., and Е. А. Буркина. "Features of the theory of industrial crises M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky." Industrial Economics, no. 3 (June 30, 2024): 10–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886.2024.3.3.001.
Full textAbstract:
Статья посвящена раскрытию сущности и причин промышленных кризисов согласно теории, предложенной М. И. Туган-Барановским. Отмечены основные теории цикла, которые, по мнению ученого, объясняют проблемы кризиса производства, а именно теории производства, обмена и распределения. Делается вывод, что природа экономических кризисов коренится во всем комплексе экономических отношений общественного воспроизводства в условиях капитализма. Однако в современных условиях промышленные кризисы обусловлены факторами, которые не вписываются в рамки традиционных экономических теорий. The article is devoted to revealing the essence and causes that determine the occurrence of industrial crises according to the theory proposed by M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky. The main theories of the cycle are noted, which, according to the scientist, explain the problems of the production crisis, namely the theories of production, exchange and distribution. As a result of his research, the author comes to the conclusion that the nature of economic crises is rooted in the entire complex of economic relations of social reproduction under capitalism. However, in modern conditions, industrial crises are caused by factors that do not fit into the framework of traditional economic theories.
14
Makasheva, N. A. "Walras and Tugan-Baranovsky on socialism: Reconciling economic science and social ideal." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 2 (February 6, 2024): 49–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-49-66.
Full textAbstract:
Nowadays, Leon Walras (1839—1910) is well-known first and foremost for his “Elements of pure political economy, or the theory of public wealth” (1874, 1877) and Mikhail Ivanovich Tugan-Baranovsky (1865—1919) gained a wide recognition due to his book “Industrial crises in contemporary England: Their causes and influences on the life of the people” (1894), which had a significant impact on the development of economics. At the same time, both economists were deeply concerned not only with theoretical problems, but also with those that are now considered beyond the scope of theory, the problem of social ideal and that of a more just social system being among them. Walras and Tugan-Baranovsky associated the embodiment of the social ideal with socialism and strived for an economic system that corresponded to that ideal, albeit their conceptions of socialism being different. The principal opportunity to achieve reconciliation between science and ideal was associated with a synthetic approach reconciling the scientific method and ideal, economics being considered “a bridge” between them, or a «testing ground», where the reconciliation was to take place. Although history has shown that Walras’s and Tugan-Baranovsky’s ideas of socialism were utopian, the very fact that two eminent economists were deeply concerned with the problem of social ideal and socialism at a time when the foundations of modern economics were being laid, shows that the striving of economists to create objective and rigorous science was, to a measure, driven by their aspiration to solve the social problem and to set up a social and economic system which is rational and more just than the existing one
15
Рогачевская, Майя. "Выдающийся российский экономист Михаил Иванович Туган-Барановский". Историко-экономические исследования 18, № 4 (2017): 613–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2017.18(4).613-649.
Full text
16
Tugan-Baranovsky, Dzuchi. "М.И. Туган-Барановский и его отношение к марксизму". Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, № 2 (листопад 2013): 26–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2013.2.3.
Full text
17
Ильченко, А. А., and Т. И. Рудченко. "The theory of economic cycles M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky in the history of world economic analysis." Industrial Economics, no. 3 (June 30, 2024): 14–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886.2024.3.3.002.
Full textAbstract:
Статья посвящена работе выдающегося российского экономиста М. И. Туган-Барановского «Промышленные кризисы в современной Англии, их причины и влияние на народную жизнь». Особое внимание уделяется влиянию идей ученого на развитие экономической мысли в части циклического развития, а также подчеркивается, что его метод исследования, представляет успешное сочетание эмпирических наблюдений за общими социально-экономическими явлениями и метода абстракции. The article is devoted to the work of the outstanding Russian economist M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky Industrial crises in modern England, their causes and impact on people’s life. Particular attention is paid to the influence of Tugan-Baranovsky’s ideas on the development of economic thought in terms of cyclical development, and it is also emphasized that his research method is a successful combination of empirical observations of general socio-economic phenomena and the method of abstraction.
18
Didkivska, Lesia. "On the history of the M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky Ukrainian cooperative institute." Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni 2018, no. 51 (2018): 78–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2018.51.078.
Full text
19
Barnett, Vincent. "Calling up the Reserves: Keynes, Tugan-Baranovsky and Russian War Finance." Europe-Asia Studies 53, no. 1 (2001): 151–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668130123740.
Full text
20
Луценко, Е. А., and Е. В. Василенко. "On the issue of the emergence of russian capitalism: the principled view of M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky." Industrial Economics, no. 3 (June 30, 2024): 29–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886.2024.3.3.004.
Full textAbstract:
В статье анализируются взгляды известного российского экономиста конца XIX – первой четверти ХХ века М. И. Туган-Барановского о подготовленности России к крупному производству. Особое внимание уделяется развитию фабричного производства как естественного и необходимого следствия социального и экономического положения России. Выявляются концептуальные особенности развития российского капитализма, во многом не схожие с опытом промышленного развития Западной Европы. Раскрывается роль концепции ученого в преодолении теории, изображающей развитие капитализма в России как искусственного процесса, вызванного исключительно вмешательством государства. Исследуется методологическое значение, которое придавал М. И. Туган-Барановский проблеме разграничения естественности и искусственности в социально-экономическом развитии общества. The article analyzes the principled view of the famous Russian economist of the late XIX – first quarter of the twentieth century M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky on Russia’s preparedness for large-scale production. Special attention is paid to the development of factory production as a natural and necessary consequence of Russia’s social and economic situation. The conceptual features of the development of capitalism in Russia are revealed, which in many ways are not similar to the experience of industrial development in Western Europe. The role of the scientist’s concept in overcoming the theory depicting the development of capitalism in Russia as an artificial process caused solely by state intervention is revealed. The methodological importance attached by M. Tugan-Baranovsky to the problem of distinguishing naturalness and artificiality in the socio-economic development of society is investigated.
21
Фомина, М. В., and Е. В. Стельмашенко. "M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky on the question of the methodology of economic science." Industrial Economics, no. 3 (June 30, 2024): 48–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886.2024.3.3.008.
Full textAbstract:
В статье предпринята попытка исторического анализа системного кризиса экономической науки. Рассмотрен вклад великого ученого-экономиста М. И. Туган-Барановского в развитие методологии экономической теории. Особенностью ученого-исследователя и его фундаментальных трудов является новаторская для его времени попытка объединения достижений различных экономических школ и течений при анализе экономических явлений и процессов. Значительный вклад в развитие методологии экономической теории М. И. Туган-Барановского состоит в определении параметров соотношения объективного и субъективного в исследовании социально-экономического развития общества; в выделении первостепенного и второстепенного в изучаемом явлении с учетом интересов и противоречий; в применении наряду с традиционными методами «этического элемента» общественных наук в процессе исследования экономических явлений и процессов. The article attempts a historical analysis of the systemic crisis of economic science. The contribution of the great scientist-economist M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky to the development of the methodology of economic theory is considered. The peculiarity of the scientist-researcher and his fundamental works is an innovative, for his time, attempt to combine the achievements of various economic schools and trends in the analysis of economic phenomena and processes. A significant contribution to the development of the methodology of economic theory by M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky consists in determining the parameters of the correlation between the objective and the subjective in the study of the socio-economic development of society; in highlighting the primary and secondary in the phenomenon under study, taking into account interests and contradictions; In the application, along with traditional methods, of the “ethical element” of the social sciences in the process of studying economic phenomena and processes.
22
Besomi, Daniele. "‘Marxism Gone Mad’: Tugan-Baranovsky on crises, their possibility and their periodicity." Review of Political Economy 18, no. 2 (2006): 147–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538250600571338.
Full text
23
Barnett, V. "Tugan-Baranovsky, the Methodology of Political Economy, and the "Russian Historical School"." History of Political Economy 36, no. 1 (2004): 79–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-36-1-79.
Full text
24
Гаврилина, Е. И. "М. И. Туган-Барановский: к вопросу о методологии экономической науки". Industrial Economics, S1 (18 грудня 2024): 10–14. https://doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886.2024.40.61.001.
Full textAbstract:
В статье предпринята попытка исторического анализа системного кризиса экономической науки. Рассмотрен вклад великого ученого-экономиста М. И. Туган-Барановского в развитие методологии экономической теории. Особенностью ученого-исследователя и его фундаментальных трудов является новаторская для его времени попытка объединения достижений различных экономических школ и течений при анализе экономических явлений и процессов. Значительный вклад ученого в развитие методологии экономической теории состоит в определении параметров соотношения объективного и субъективного в исследовании социально-экономического развития общества; в выделении первостепенного и второстепенного в изучаемом явлении с учетом интересов и противоречий; в применении наряду с традиционными методами «этического элемента» общественных наук в процессе исследования экономических явлений и процессов. The article attempts a historical analysis of the systemic crisis of economic science. The contribution of the great scientist-economist M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky to the development of the methodology of economic theory is considered. The peculiarity of the scientist-researcher and his fundamental works is an innovative, for his time, attempt to combine the achievements of various economic schools and trends in the analysis of economic phenomena and processes. A significant contribution to the development of the methodology of economic theory by M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky consists in determining the parameters of the correlation between the objective and the subjective in the study of the socio-economic development of society; in highlighting the primary and secondary in the phenomenon under study, taking into account interests and contradictions; In the application, along with traditional methods, of the “ethical element” of the social sciences in the process of studying economic phenomena and processes.
25
Shcherbakova, Elizaveta G. "ECONOMIC AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF RETROSPECTIVE EVENTS (VERIFICATION OF M.I. TUGAN-BARANOVSKY'S THESIS ON INDICATIVE PROPERTIES OF IRON PRICES)." SOFT MEASUREMENTS AND COMPUTING 6, no. 67 (2023): 5–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.36871/2618-9976.2023.06.001.
Full textAbstract:
The problem of improving economic forecasting systems remains unresolved and is critically important for ensuring economic growth and sustainability of the global economic system in the future. M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky suggested that the dynamics of prices for iron, which is the main component of the production of means of production, can become an indicator of the economic situation. This assumption formed the basis of a study conducted using the Infoanalytic software package based on the methodology of soft mathematical measurements and a regularizing Bayesian approach. The results of the verification of the idea of an outstanding Russian economist are presented in this article.
26
Nureev, Rustem M. "Theory of Cycles of M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky: View from the XXI Century." Journal of Institutional Studies 8, no. 2 (2016): 6–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2016.8.2.006-024.
Full text
27
Klyukin, P. "Revision of the Neo-Ricardian Theory of Value and Distribution: New Evidence and New Perspectives." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 5 (May 20, 2007): 117–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-5-117-137.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to historical and theoretical analysis of origins and perspectives of the neo-Ricardian theory as a special scientific approach to economic analysis. The author considers the works of Russian economists such as M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky, V. K. Dmitriev, N. N. Shaposhnikov and V. I. Bortkiewicz. He analyzes the development of their views, their mutual influences and the role of Marxian political economy in the historical development of neo-Ricardianism. Drawing from the archival evidence the article shows that the Russian tradition in political economy is in many respects an anticipation of the works of P. Sraffa and neo-Ricardian theory as a whole.
28
РЫЖОВ, И. В., and А. Н. РУБИЩЕВ. "REFLECTION OF THE PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL REPRODUCTION IN THE VIEWS OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CLASSICAL DIRECTION OF RUSSIAN ECONOMICS OF THE XIX CENTURY." Экономика и предпринимательство, no. 1(150) (May 27, 2023): 1360–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.34925/eip.2023.150.1.278.
Full textAbstract:
В статье нашли отражение проблемы общественного воспроизводства во взглядах представителей классического направления российской экономической науки XIX столетия, а также рассмотрены взгляды экономистов математического направления. Наиболее пристальное внимание уделено таким отечественным ученым, как Д.И. Менделеев, П.Б. Струве, М.И. Туган-Барановский, С.Н. Булгаков, Ю.Г. Жуковский, В.К. Дмитриев, Е.Е. Слуцкий. The article reflects the problems of social reproduction in the views of representatives of the classical direction of Russian economics of the XIX century, and also considers the views of economists of the mathematical direction. The closest attention is paid to such domestic scientists as D.I. Mendeleev, P.B. Struve, M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky, S.N. Bulgakov, Yu.G. Zhukovsky, V.K. Dmitriev, E.E. Slutsky.
29
Прилепская, Ю. В., and Е. В. Стельмашенко. "The issue of land relations and human capital in the works of M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky." Industrial Economics, no. 3 (June 30, 2024): 34–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886.2024.3.3.005.
Full textAbstract:
Статья посвящена анализу существующих тенденций в сфере земельных отношений, неравномерности распределения плодородия земель как отдельных регионов, так и в целом по странам. Особое внимание в данном контексте уделяется диалектическому единству мелкого и крупного земледелия в процессе достижения продовольственной безопасности, особенностям земельного вопроса в историческом контексте в трудах М. И. Туган-Барановского. Также определены особенности крупнотоварного и мелкотоварного землепользования, обозначены преимущества и недостатки этих форм ведения хозяйства. Раскрываются причины богатства и бедности в современном мире, анализируются существующие тенденции и перспективы формирования принципов экономики благосостояния на основе разумного землепользования. The article is devoted to the analysis of existing trends in the field of land relations, the uneven distribution of land fertility, both in individual regions and in countries as a whole. At the same time, special attention in this context is paid to the dialectical unity of small and large-scale agriculture in the process of achieving food security in regions and countries. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of the land issue in its historical context in the works of M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky. The features of large-scale and small-scale land use are also identified, the advantages and disadvantages of these forms of farming are outlined. The research reveals the causes of wealth and poverty in the modern world, analyzes existing trends and prospects for the formation of the principles of the welfare economy based on reasonable land use.
30
Feshchenko, Valentyna. "Ukrainian economic thought of the last third of the 19th – early 20th centuries in the context of the development of the european liberal tradition." Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni 2019, no. 52 (2019): 7–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2019.52.007.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes the features of the development of marginalism and the emergence of a modern methodology for the analysis of economic processes in Ukrainian economic thought, starting with the development of the Kyiv scientific school headed by M. Bunge and ending with the works of prominent Ukrainian scientists E. Slutsky and M. Tugan-Baranovsky. These problems, considering their relevance for the present, are the subjects of modern scholars’ researches, such as T. Hayday, I. Golovata, V. Kudlak, O. Kurbet, V. Nebrat, N. Suprun, Y. Ushchapovsky, V. Feshchenko and others. The purpose of the article is to highlight the scientific contribution of Ukrainian economists of the last third of the 19th – beginning of the 20th centuries to the development of marginalism and Western European liberalism, to reveal the emergence of a new methodology of economic analysis based on the combination of ideas of classical political economy and marginal analysis, the historical school’ principles with the European socio-reformism, and the use of functional analysis with economic and mathematical research tools. Significant progress of the Ukrainian economic science in this period are the theoretical achievements of representatives of the Kyiv School of Political Economy. In the works of M. Bunge, D. Pikhno, R. Orzhentsky, and O. Bilimovych, the attention was focused on the development of the theory of value with the use of marginal analysis, the psychological foundations of the theory of value were supported, and the emphasis was placed on the social orientation of research. E. Slutsky's works «The Theory of Marginal Utility», and «On the Theory of Consumer Budget» reflected new approaches to understanding utility as an economic category, determined the value of market goods in terms of their usefulness and rarity, and initiated the study of market behavior and mechanisms of formation and stability of the consumer budget. In the context of the formation of the new methodology for economic analysis, the author reveals the priority and significance of the creation of the synthetic theory of value by M. Tugan-Baranovsky. The article highlights the significant influence of Ukrainian scientists of the studied period on the development of world economic science and substantiates the necessity of further study of their scientific work.
31
Филатов, Илья Владимирович. "KANTIAN ETHICS AND THE SPIRIT OF CAPITALISM." Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Серия: Философия, no. 4(58) (December 29, 2021): 187–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.26456/vtphilos/2021.4.187.
Full textAbstract:
Рассматривается вопрос о совместимости этики Канта с принципами капиталистической экономики. Оценивается позиция Л. Мизеса, считавшего, что этика Канта несовместима с теорией рыночной экономики. Рассматривается противоположный взгляд на эту проблему М.И. Туган-Барановского. Показывается, что Кант был знаком с экономическими идеями А. Смита и не видел в них явных противоречий с собственным моральным учением. Проводится аналогия между моральным индивидуализмом Канта и экономическим индивидуализмом Смита. The question of the compatibility of Kant's ethics with the principles of the capitalist economy is considered. The position of L. Mises, who believed that Kant's ethics is incompatible with the theory of market economy, is assessed. The opposite view on this problem of M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky are considered. It is shown that Kant was familiar with the economic ideas of A. Smith and did not see in them obvious contradictions with his own ethical theory. An analogy is drawn between Kant's moral individualism and Smith's economic individualism.
32
Ionesov, V. I., and S. N. Folomeev. "Principal approaches of M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky to the society of the future: between state socialism and anarchism." Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, no. 2 (2021): 26–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2021-10204.
Full text
33
Volodymyr, Dubinsky. "M. Tugan-Baranovsky on Ways to Solve the Agrarian Question in the Dnieper Ukraine in the Early Twentieth Century." Scientific Papers of the Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University. History 1, no. 30 (2020): 324–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.32626/2309-2254.2020-30.324-328.
Full text
34
Altukhov, Oleksii. "„Banking Encyclopedia” as a source on the history of stock exchange business in Ukraine in the late nineteenth – early XX century." Bulletin of Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, no. 9 (347) (2021): 15–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2021-9(347)-15-20.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers and analyzes the informational significance of the leading economic specialized publication of the late XIX – early XX centuries. „Banking Encyclopedia”. It is noted that in 1917 the second volume of this work, fundamental at that time in the field of economics, was published in Kyiv, which was entirely devoted to the study of stock exchange business in the leading countries, the Russian Empire and the Ukrainian lands. The co-authors of the work were leading contemporary economists and lawyers, in particular A. N. Antsiferov, G. V. Afanasyev, H. A. Baranovsky, M. N. Bogolepov, E. V. Vanshtein, I. M. Goldstein, N. S. Dobrokhotov, V. Ya. Zheleznov, A. M. Lazarev, D. N. Levin, E. S. Lurie, P. P. Migulin, N. D. Silin, P. B. Struve, M. P. Tugan-Baranovsky and others. Among the aspects considered were, in particular, the activities of the leading stock exchange institutions of Dnieper Ukraine: in Odessa, in Kyiv, in Kharkiv. Leading economist, professor of the Kyiv Commercial Institute, long-term deputy of the State Duma Leonid Mykolayovych Yasnopolsky became the editor-in-chief of the publication. Analyzing the scientific works collected in the Second Volume of the Banking Encyclopedia of 1917, the author of the article came to the conclusion that they make it possible to trace the state of affairs in the development of the stock market in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In particular, one can trace the state policy towards these financial institutions, which in many respects slowed down the development of the stock market, both in Ukraine and in the Russian Empire as a whole.
35
Altukhov, Oleksii. "Organization of еxchange activity in Trans-Dnieper Ukraine according to the publication "Banking Encyclopedia" in the late 19th – early 20th century". Bulletin of Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, № 2 (356) (2023): 4–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2023-2(356)-4-12.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers and analyzes the informational significance of the leading economic specialized publication of the late XIX – early XX centuries. "Banking Encyclopedia". It is noted that in 1917 the second volume of this work, fundamental at that time in the field of economics, was published in Kyiv, which was entirely devoted to the study of stock exchange business in the leading countries, the Russian Empire and the Ukrainian lands. The co-authors of the work were leading contemporary economists and lawyers, in particular A. N. Antsiferov, G. V. Afanasyev, H. A. Baranovsky, M. N. Bogolepov, E. V. Vanshtein, I. M. Goldstein, N. S. Dobrokhotov, V. Ya. Zheleznov, A. M. Lazarev, D. N. Levin, E. S. Lurie, P. P. Migulin, N. D. Silin, P. B. Struve, M. P. Tugan-Baranovsky and others. Among the aspects considered were, in particular, the activities of the leading stock exchange institutions of Dnieper Ukraine: in Odessa, in Kyiv, in Kharkiv. Leading economist, professor of the Kyiv Commercial Institute, long-term deputy of the State Duma Leonid Mykolayovych Yasnopolsky became the editor-in-chief of the publication. Analyzing the scientific works collected in the Second Volume of the Banking Encyclopedia of 1917, the author of the article came to the conclusion that they make it possible to trace the state of affairs in the development of the stock market in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In particular, one can trace the state policy towards these financial institutions, which in many respects slowed down the development of the stock market, both in Ukraine and in the Russian Empire as a whole.
36
Marinova, Tsvetelina. "Cooperative thought in Bulgaria in the first half of the 20th century. The place and role of M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky." Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni 2020, no. 53 (2020): 34–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2020.53.034.
Full text
37
Zinchenko, Viktoriia, Svitlana Ostapenko, and Hannah Udovichenko. "Introduction of Academic Honesty as a Necessary Prerequisite and an Important Component of Quality Education for Future Economists." Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 13, no. 1 (2021): 81–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.1/361.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with: academic honesty as an important component of higher education as a social institution; legislative changes aimed at promoting academic integrity in higher education institutions of Ukraine; the most successful European practices in combating and preventing academic misconduct, and with measures undertaken internationally by the Ukrainian academic community to address this important issue. Additionally, the overview of all-Ukrainian statistics on academic dishonesty of students and results of a survey on this problem of freshmen of economic specialties of Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named after Mykhailo Tugan-Baranovsky are provided; the ways of introduction of academic honesty in the life of the university and development of academic culture are presented; interesting academic materials on the outlined problem for work in training future economists the course of «Academіс Writing» are offered. The authors apply the following scientific methods: theoretical – analysis and synthesis, analogy and thought experiment; practical – analysis of scientific literature on the basis of which conclusions are grounded. The main scientific results are obtained through the use of a marketing research method, including a survey, analysis of the data obtained in order to find out the most acute causes of academic fraud, violations of academic culture and honesty of economic specialities students’ integrity. The authors prove that in order to overcome academic dishonesty, it is necessary to address the human dignity of each student, in addition to the formation of appropriate competencies and skills.
38
Ekshibarova, Olga V. "The Philosophy of “a New Christianity” by F. M. Dostoevsky." Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy 20, no. 4 (2020): 354–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2020-20-4-354-358.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the philosophical views and world outlook of F. M. Dostoevsky. The author analyzes the validity of accusation of Dostoevsky in “a new Christianity”. Based on the comparison of the writer’s own thoughts and polemical statements about his work by such philosophers as V. S. Solovyov, V. V. Rozanov, D. S. Merezhkovsky, and M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky, the author provides the description of Dostoevsky’s “new Christianity”. The hermeneutical method allows the author to analyze both the primary sources of Christian thought (the New and the Old Testaments), as well as the works by Dostoevsky and the articles of his contemporaries, who discuss the writer’s philosophical views. The purpose of this work is to compare the concept of “the new Christianity of Dostoevsky” with the understanding of “Christianity” as such. This comparison, not previously considered, is a new perspective on the writer’s philosophical worldview. The article compares the main aspects of Christianity (freedom of choice, spiritual revival, the gospel as a source of enlightenment) in the first Apostolic understanding and in the works by Dostoevsky. Based on the analysis of the comparison, it is concluded that Dostoevsky’s “new Christianity” supports the principles of the first Apostolic Christianity. However, at the same time, Dostoevsky’s “new Christianity” sees the way of development of modern Christianity in a spiritual and moral, “educational” aspect. Thus the problem of whether Dostoevsky’s “new Christianity” is the author’s interpretation of Christianity by the writer is considered and solved.
39
Лясников, Н. В., and Ю. В. Лясникова. "Economic views on the theory of crises and cycles: a historical aspect." Вестник МИРБИС, no. 3(31) (October 4, 2022): 57–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.25634/mirbis.2022.3.6.
Full textAbstract:
Проблематику циклов затрагивали в своих исследованиях практически все известные экономисты. Эта тема интересовала К. Маркса, Дж. Кейнса, М. Туган-Барановского, К. Жюгляра, Э. Хансена, Я. Тинбергена, Й. Шумпетера, Ф. Хайека, Дж. Хикса, П. Самуэльсона и многих других. Учёные искали ответ на вопрос: в чем заключается причина цикличности экономического развития и почему колебания происходят с определенной периодичностью? Было проведено немало теоретических исследований, посвященных поиску причины, по которой происходит выведение экономического «маятника» из равновесия. Ключевую роль в возникновении этих колебаний играют факторы эндогенного характера. К ним исследователи причисляют: подъём/спад заработной платы; непредсказуемость и невозможность спрогнозировать инвестиционные процессы; неконтролируемость фондовых рынков; определенные периоды обновления основных фондов производства. The problems of cycles were touched upon in their studies by almost all well-known economists. This topic was of interest to K. Marx, J. Keynes, M. Tugan-Baranovsky, K. Juglar, E. Hansen, J. Tinbergen, J. Schumpeter, F. Hayek, J. Hicks, P. Samuelson and many others. Scientists were looking for an answer to the question: what is the reason for the cyclical nature of economic development and why do fluctuations occur with a certain periodicity? A lot of theoretical research has been carried out to find the reason why the economic "pendulum" is thrown out of balance. Endogenous factors play a key role in the occurrence of these fluctuations. Researchers rank among them: rise / fall in wages; unpredictability and inability to predict investment processes; uncontrolled stock markets; certain periods of renewal of fixed assets of production.
40
Sizemskaya, Irina N. "“Legal marxism”: a page from the history of marxism in Russia." Polylogos 8, no. 1 (27) (2024): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.18254/s258770110030428-2.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines “legal marxism” as a movement within Russian marxism in the 90s of the 19th century, which entered the history of Russian philosophical thought under the sign of criticism of populism from the standpoint of the economic materialism of K. Marx and the idea of social liberalism about the rule of law. In this context, the project of P.B. became the subject of special attention. Struve capitalization of Russia, supported by S.N. Bulgakov and M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky. Their research in this direction focused on the development of the country along the path of modernizing the economy and its institutional structures, taking into account national history, the characteristics of existing forms of community life, and cultural traditions. The meaning of the necessary transformations was in the formula “to transform Russia into a rich capitalist country,” and the components of this process included economic growth and its entry into the world community as a civilized state. Adhering to a materialist interpretation of history, Struve and his associates saw the historical mission of capitalism in creating material and cultural conditions for the further forward movement of history and therefore were far from recognizing capitalism as an “eternal” formation. The author of the article draws attention to the fact that the socio-philosophical paradigm of “legal Marxism” warned against leftist orthodox attitudes both in understanding the problem and in turning to the teachings of Marx in connection with it.
41
Brukhanchik, Ekaterina A. "The study of the credit and financial system of the Russian Empire (1861–1914) in pre-revolutionary historiography: university schools of Ukraine." Journal of the Belarusian State University. History, no. 3 (July 29, 2020): 83–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.33581/2520-6338-2020-3-83-92.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the study of the university schools of Ukraine that developed issues of credit and finance of the Russian Empire in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century in the pre-revolutionary period. Its purpose is to determine the main scientific achievements of the Kyiv, Kharkiv and Odessa schools of financial law in studying the credit and financial system of the Russian Empire (1861–1914) by establishing the features of pre-revolutionary Ukrainian historiography, identifying the characteristics of each of these scientific schools, and identifying their representatives. The relevance of the article is determined by studying the scientific heritage of the most progressive schools of financial law, whose representatives not only participated in legislative activities (preparation of draft legislative acts on the implementation of the foreclosure operation, financial reform of 1895–1897, in the field of small loans), were part of the collegial management bodies largest banks, but also put forward original ideas of both practical and theoretical nature. Many proposals of Ukrainian economists formed the basis for new areas of economic thought (M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky is one of the founder of institutionalism). Their legacy can be applied in solving modern strategic tasks of the state. The novelty of the study is determined by the fact that for the first time systematized the ideas of Ukrainian schools of economists regarding credit and finance of the Russian Empire in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century. The characteristic features of the Kyiv scientific school (status representatives, progressive ideas, contribution to the development of institutionalism), Kharkiv school (popularization of the ideas of credit cooperation, conducting scientific seminars on pressing economic issues) and Odessa school (criticism of banks, their classification) are determined. The most common topics for research are noted, prominent representatives are listed.
42
Sazanova, Svetlana L., and Mikhail S. Mokiy. "Mutual aid and competition as driving forces of economic development." Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 2 (June 30, 2023): 7–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2023-2(101)-7-17.
Full textAbstract:
The theory of competition is one of the main theories of modern economic science and is an important component of its methodological and theoretical apparatus. In the classical and neoclassical paradigm of economic science, competition is objective, independent of individual economic entities, the basis of the market mechanism, an “invisible hand” that coordinates the activities of producers and consumers, the distribution of limited resources, the creation, distribution and use of economic benefits. Over the past 250 years, the theory of competition has gone through the path of formation and development and currently has a developed methodology that has made it possible to distinguish and study various types of competition and various types of market structures: pure competition, oligopoly, pure monopoly, monopolistic competition. The developed economic and mathematical apparatus of the microeconomic theory of competition makes it possible to realize its cognitive, practical and ideological functions. But throughout the entire period of formation and development of the theory of competition, there has been criticism of it. The object of criticism are both theoretical and practical aspects of the theory of competition. The most prominent opponents of the supporters of the theory of competition are Russian scientists: P. Kropotkin, A. Chayanov, N. Kondratiev, M. Tugan-Baranovsky, S. Kirdina-Chandler, G. Kleiner and others. They contrast the theory of competition with the theory of mutual aid, according to which mutual aid, not competition, is the driving force behind economic development. The authors of the article reconstructed the process of formation and development of the theory of competition and the theory of mutual assistance, revealed the relative heuristic significance of both theories, clarified the concept of “mutual assistance” in relation to the concept of “cooperation”, substantiated the existence of the dichotomy “mutual assistance – competition” and proved that it is driving force of economic development.
43
Stozhko, Dmitrii K., and Konstantin P. Stozhko. "The Agrarian Question in the Views of N. Kh. Bunge (to the 200th Anniversary of his Birthday)." Economic History 19, no. 1 (2023): 76–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.15507/2409-630x.060.019.202301.076-086.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction. 2023 marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of N. Kh. Bunge, an outstanding Russian scientist, economist, public figure and statesman. His views, especially on the agrarian question, are still poorly understood. The aim of the study is to analyze and evaluate the views of N. Kh. Bunge on the agrarian issue and to reveal their humanistic nature. Materials and Methods. The study used methods of analysis, synthesis, generalizations and axiology, as well as historical-retrospective, historical-genetic and hermeneutical, program-targeted and structural-functional methods for studying problematic issues in the history of economic science. The study is based on primary sources: the writings of N. Kh. Bunge himself and the works of his contemporaries. Results. Among the most significant ideas in the field of posing and solving the agrarian issue of N. Kh. Bunge, his approaches to the issues of land ownership and land use, migration (settlement) processes, the development of peasant self-government, the development of rental, tax and financial-credit relations are identified and disclosed. The multidimensional and at the same time contradictory nature of the views of N. Kh. Bunge in matters of domestic economic policy were revealed. The conclusion is made about the humanistic orientation of the scientific heritage of the scientist and the need for its further more detailed study in the context of a new social reality. Discussion and Conclusion. Specific approaches of Russian historiography to the study of the works of N. Kh. Bunge in the pre-revolutionary period (A. N. Zak, I. I. Levin, A. A. Mikulin, M. N. Sobolev, M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky and others) and the growing interest in his political and economic views in the 21st century. An assessment is given to the debatable thesis about the characterization of the views of N. Kh. Bunge as being “between historicism and liberalism” (J. Zweinert).
44
Pavanelli, Giovanni. "Is There an Endogenous Tendency towards Equilibrium in Economic Systems? Business Cycles and Crises in the Modern Economic Thought." Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics 1, no. 2 (2022): 3–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.37075/bjiep.2021.2.01.
Full textAbstract:
This paper critically examines the models of economic crises and business cycles devised by leading economists from the nineteenth century to the present day in the light of the current reflections on the limits of the so-called ‘mainstream’ theory. To this end, the article analyses the point of view of the classical authors (J.B. Say, Ricardo, Malthus and Sismondi) and the first analyses of crises in terms of business cycles (Tooke, Juglar, Jevons). It discusses then Tugan-Baranovsky and Arthur Spiethoff models, Wesley C. Mitchell contribution and the monetary explanations of the cycles during the 1920s (R.G. Hawtrey and Irving Fisher). It then examines the main interpretative models of cycles and crises during the 1930s: L. Mises and F. Hayek models, Irving Fisher’s Debt-deflation theory and Keynes contribution. The econometric approach of Frisch and Tinbergen and the ‘real business cycles’ model are then presented, as well as the ‘heterodox’ approach of Hyman Minsky. A main interpretative line of this paper is to maintain that, in spite of its complex taxonomy, modern analysis on business cycles and crises draws inspiration from two distinct methodological approaches that reflect radically different visions of how market economies actually work. The ‘majority’ view is the one shared by most marginalist and neoclassical authors and by the ‘New Classical Economists’. According to them, economic systems are intrinsically stable and tend to converge towards equilibrium. Fluctuations are caused by exogenous shocks bound to be reabsorbed quickly. Contrary to this view, two research approaches are identified having in common a marked attention to the institutional context. On the one hand, the contributions of Schumpeter and, to some extent, Mitchell who shared the belief that fluctuations should be studied with reference to a specific historical context. On the other hand, the analysis of J.M. Keynes and H. Minsky who believe that economic systems are potentially unstable, full employment cannot be taken for granted and appropriate policy measures are needed. Keywords: business cycles, crises, Say’s Law, Hyman Minsky, Wesley C. Mitchell, New Classical Economics, real business cycles JEL: B3, N1, B41
45
Alpyspaeva, Galya A. "History of Activities of the Akmola District Union of Cooperatives (1917–1922)." Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 464 (2021): 113–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/15617793/464/13.
Full textAbstract:
Based on the analysis of the previously unused archival sources and research works on the history of Russian cooperation, the main areas of the activities of the Akmola District Union of Cooperatives in 1917–1922 are studied and generalized. In terms of methodology, the study is based on the works of ideologists of Russian cooperation (M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky, V.F. Totomianets, A.V. Chayanov, and others) and the original concepts they developed. The article analyzes the activities of the Union of Cooperatives of a particular micro-region: the number of employees, organizational structure and management, organization of industrial production, financial and social policies, cultural and educational activities. The author substantiates the role of the District Union of Cooperatives in the development of economic relations in the region and in the district peasant farms’ entry into the all-Russian market. Despite the difficult political circumstances and the relatively short period of existence (from August 1917 to the end of 1922), the Akmola District Union of Cooperatives became an economic and organizational center, contributed to the establishment and development of the consumer cooperation system not only in the district, but also in the region: it initiated the establishment of the regional Union of Steppe Cooperatives. In the conditions of the territorial remoteness from industrial centers and the underdeveloped transport infrastructure, the District Union of Cooperatives significantly facilitated and promoted the production activities of the peasants of the region connecting them with the market, expedited the involvement of Kazakh farms in the regional economy. The Union carried out an active social policy and diversified cultural and educational work, allocated significant amounts from its profits to the development of education in the district. According to the author, the activities of the Akmola District Union of Cooperatives can be considered as an integral part of the national cooperative movement, and its success was due to the application of the allRussian experience during the heyday of cooperation in the country.
46
БЛОХА, Ярослав Євгенійович. "В.Г. КОРОЛЕНКО ПРО ЦІННІСНІ ОРІЄНТАЦІЇ ЛЕГАЛЬНОГО МАРКСИЗМУ". Філософські обрії, № 33 (15 липня 2015): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20370.
Full textAbstract:
V.G. Korolenko considered the basic social value orientations of the late 19th century – early 20th century in the light of the theory of Karl Marx and his Russian followers who, according to the thinker, in many ways vulgarized and simplified the teachings of Marxism adherents. V.G. Korolenko concludes that communism that is the aim for the theorists of Marxism as a philosophical, political and economic doctrine and movement seeks only to defend narrow class values, and particularly the needs of factories for providing the proletariat, forgetting about the social value orientations and values of other layers of society including intelligentsia and peasants. V.G. Korolenko reproached newly created government of the country that by rejecting the values of other social classes (especially the intelligentsia that was always followed by the common people) they had created a “barracks communism” thereby alienating the supporters of socialism in the country. Unlike the legal Marxists, including Struve and Tugan-Baranovsky, V.G. Korolenko admits that the religion is one of the major social values. Due to the fact that the thinker cannot be called a religious person, we can claim that his observations of the people’s resistance to violent imposing of atheism and his justification of the importance of spiritual and religious value orientations are objective, if detached, but at the same time they are deeply concerned and sincere. In V.G. Korolenko’s view, only the true religion is the main factor in consolidating the society because increased inciting ethnic and religious hatred that is opposite to the spirit of true Christianity suppresses a sense of justice and humanity, fundamentally corrupts society and can lead to moral savagery, especially under the decline of humanistic feelings and the weakness of the law, observed in the Russian society in the early twentieth century. Values of faith are important to Korolenko primarily because the religious faith, which is perceived mainly as an ethical value keeping from bad behavior, provides peace of mind, gives strength and hope, and creates a sense of mercy, compassion and kindness
47
Yuliya, Bondarenko, and Kulinich Tetiana. "INVESTIGATION OF CONDITIONS AND BENEFITS FOR UKRAINE IN THE TRANSITION OF ITS HOUSEHOLD IN THE RANK OF THE INTERNAL INVESTOR OF THE STATE." EUREKA: Social and Humanities, no. 1 (January 31, 2018): 10–22. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2018.00552.
Full textAbstract:
In the article the place, role and functions of families (households) as economic subjects of the market system are clarified. The interrelation, interdependence of categories of "savings", "investments" and "consumption" is defined. The importance and location of the internal investor in the investment process at the macroeconomic level is proved. The algorithm for determining the level of aggregate income of a family necessary for transition to the rank of an internal investor of the state is presented. Parallels are drawn between the author's theoretical and methodical approach proposed in the article and between the theories (laws, models) of a number of well-known economists, such as E. Engel, M. Tugan-Baranovsky, J. Keynes, P. Samuelson and others. The features of practical definition of the minimum level of the aggregate income of a family and a household for savings and investments for Ukrainian realities are revealed. The current and desired operating conditions and the results of financial and economic development of each of the interested parties are considered. In particular, for the population it is shown how, based on its real income, to identify and plan expenditures in order to move to investments. In addition, it is investigated: first, what exactly is the real minimum level of income per month will allow one person or a family (of two, three, four people) to survive in the economic conditions that defined public authorities and formed the market; secondly, what exactly need s a person or a household to be able to meet at an appropriate level of income; thirdly, what level of income will allow the population to save and convert these savings into investments (with their subsequent distribution for the development of domestic business and entrepreneurship). At the same time, it is shown how the state (on Ukrainian data) can influence the growth of domestic investment in order to reduce the deficit of financial resources for the development of business and the economy of the country.
48
Makarenko, I. P. "Scientific Heritage of Mykhailo Tugan-Baranovsky (on the occasion of the anniversary of the foundation of innovative development theory of economy in Europe and the anniversary of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine)." Science and innovation 14, no. 6 (2018): 5–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/scine14.06.005.
Full text
49
Shapovalov, Vladimir V. "Major innovations theories of the 20th century (Part 1)." Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika, no. 66 (2024): 345–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/19988648/65/22.
Full textAbstract:
This article describes the main innovations theories and concepts of the 20th century. Economists confirm the importance of scientific and technological progress, innovation and institutional changes in stimulating economic growth and development. The article reviews studies conducted by prominent Russian and foreign economists such as M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky, N.D. Kondratiev, J. Schumpeter, P.A. Sorokin, S.Yu. Glaziev, G. Bernal, R. Solow, S. Kuznets, B. Twiss, G. Mensch, K. Freeman, J. Vandein, and other researchers who have made significant contributions to the study of innovations. The article outlines basic innovative theories and concepts, the evolution of approaches to assessing innovation activities, and the analysis of the impact of innovations on economic development. Important topics such as economic cycles, Kondratiev’s wave theory, Schumpeter’s concepts of “creative destruction”, as well as findings done by Bernal, Solow, and Kuznets confirming the influence of scientific and technological progress on economic growth are covered in the article. The importance of scientific research in the field of innovations is emphasized by G. Mensch, K. Freeman, J. Van Deyn, A. Kleinknecht, F. Hayek, B. Lundvall, R. Coase, S. Davis, E. Mansfield, A. Romeo, and D. North, who have identified the role of innovations in stimulating economic development and the need for institutional changes to support the innovative activities. Glaziev’s studies on technological paradigms, Freeman’s concept of a national innovation system, Van Deyn’s hypothesis on the connection between innovation and socio-economic development, as well as the work of Twiss, who highlighted the decisive impact of science and technology on socio-economic development, underscore the significance of research in the field of innovations and its impact on the economy. Innovations theories and concepts define innovation as a crucial factor in economic development, stimulating competition, increasing productivity, and contributing to the restructuring of the economy. Understanding the patterns of innovation activities and the factors influencing their effectiveness is crucial for developing effective economic policies. The results of the research can be used to determine the place of innovation in the modern world, evaluate its impact on the economic growth, and develop measures to support and stimulate the innovative activities of Russian economic entities, ensuring technological leadership and sovereignty in current conditions.
50
Makarenko, I. P. "Scientific Heritage of Mykhailo Tugan-Baranovsky (on the occasion of the anniversary of the foundation of innovative development theory of economy in Europe and the anniversary of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine)." Science and innovation 14, no. 6 (2018): 5–8.
Find full text