Academic literature on the topic 'Ulpianus'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Ulpianus.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Ulpianus"
1
Sukačić, Marko. "Dvojbena pravna narav kupnji na pokus." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 40, no. 3 (2020): 1207–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.3.10.
Full textAbstract:
The paper deals with the sale on approval of horses and mules shown in D.19,5,20 pr.- 1 (Ulpianus libro 32 ad edictum) and the existing theories on the legal position of the parties in the source. The first part of the paper sets out principium of D.19,5,20, where Ulpian quotes Labeo, and his description of the sale on approval of horses, concluded between the seller and the acrobatic rider – desultor, with a detailed analysis of the interpretations of relevant romanists. The principium is analyzed with the reference to dominant theories: theses on the suspensive and/or resolutive condition pactum displicentiae, on the innominate contract, and on pre-contractual acts. This is followed by an analysis of Ulpian’s sequel in the first paragraph of D.19,5,20 with a quotation of Mela, where he describes the sale on approval of mules, which are stolen during the test period, with Ulpian’s quote of Mela’s dilemma and of comparison with his own. Next part of the paper contains theories and interpretations of the legal nature of the relationship between the parties and the stage of contract. In conclusion, author presents his own position on the both presented situations, the legal nature of the relationship between the parties, and finally on the legal problem raised by Ulpian in the cited sources.
2
Nowicka, Dobromiła. "Stroje Rzymianek w kontekście brzmienia fragmentu D. 47, 10, 15, 15 Ulpianus libro 77 ad edictum." Prawo 324 (December 31, 2017): 49–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/0524-4544.324.3.
Full textAbstract:
Garments of Roman women in the context of fragments D. 47, 10, 15, 15 Ulpianus libro 77 ad edictumThe fact that some kinds of dress were assigned specific categories of people was to reflect — and consolidate — the existing social order expressed in the right to wear strictly defined garments. Yet a widely confirmed non-compliance with the rules concerning garments not only failed to fulfil that role, but even introduced uncertainty about the real status of inappropriately dressed individuals in the light of traditional rules of how to dress. The aim of the article is to examine the question of daily garments used by Roman women, drawing on both literary sources and images of women. The analysis is placed in the context of Ulpian’s account of modification of the liability of the perpetrator of iniuria depending on the dress worn by the woman when her good name was assaulted.Kleidung der Römerinnen im Kontext des Wortlauts des Abschnittes D. 47, 10, 15, 15 Ulpianus libro 77 ad edictumDie Bestimmung gewisser Arten der Kleidung für konkrete Gruppen von Personen sollte die geltende soziale Ordnung widerspiegeln und begründen, die sich in der Berechtigung äußerte, genau festgelegte Kleidungsbestanteile tragen zu können. Die Grundsätze betreffend Kleidung, was breit bestätigt wird, waren jedoch oft verletzt, so erfüllten sie ihre Rolle nicht. Die Verletzung dieser Grundsätze führte sogar zu Bedenken hinsichtlich des tatsächlichen Status der nicht korrekt gekleideten Person angesichts der traditionell geltenden Regeln betreffend Kleidung.Ziel des Beitrags ist, die Frage der Alltagskleidung der Römerinnen näher zu bringen, sowohl auf Grund literarischer Quellen, als auch der Abbilder der Frauen. Die Analyse wurde im Kontext der Überlieferung Ulpians über die Modifikation der Verantwortung des Verursachers von iniuria in Abhängigkeit von der Kleidung, die eine Frau während der Verletzung ihres guten Rufs trug, durchgeführt.
3
Gouron, André. "A twelfth century Scottish treatise : the ordo 'Ulpianus de edendo'." Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review 78, no. 1-2 (2010): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181910x487297.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe treatise on procedure Ulpianus de edendo was written between 1168 and 1185. Its author was a Scottish churchman who also made the formulary, given by the ms. London, Brit. Libr., Harley 2355, for a lawyer in a case of a pars ecclesiae. The work borrows from Placentinus' Summa Codicis, but not by purely mechanical ways. Its style is clear, always logical, and often axiomatic, far from Bolognese traditions. The glosses, as furnished by several manuscripts, support the hypothesis of influences of the Ulpianus among English writings, maybe from the Lincoln school.
4
Kaiser, Wolfgang. "Zur Textkritik von Ulpianus (?), lib. sing. reg. 11,4." Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung 135, no. 1 (August 1, 2018): 629–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.26498/zrgra-2018-1350120.
Full text
5
Nowicka, Dobromiła. "Wyłączenie od zeznawania i prawo odmowy zeznań w rzymskim procesie karnym." Prawo 325 (December 31, 2018): 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/0524-4544.325.2.
Full textAbstract:
Exemption from testifying and the right to refuse to testify in Roman criminal procedureThe author of article examines the scope of the exemption from testifying for the prosecution and the right to refuse to testify in the Roman criminal procedure before quaestiones. She focuses mainly of Callistratus’ and Ulpian’s accounts of lex Iulia de vi and Paulus’ account of lex Iulia iudiciorum publicorum. This is because there are doubts, especially with regard to the nature of rights or exemptions applying to testimonies concerning relations based on close kinship parents-children or patronage as well as marriage. Das Recht der Aussageverweigerung oder die Freistellung von Aussagen im römischen StrafprozessIn diesem Aufsatz wurde der Umfang der Gültigkeit der Disqualifikation als Zeuge der Anklage aufzutreten sowie das Recht der Aussageverweigerung im römischen Strafprozess vor den quaestiones behandelt. Die Analyse konzentriert sich hauptsächlich auf Überlieferungen von Callistratus und Ulpianus betreffend die Regelungen von lex Iulia de vi sowie von Paulus betreffend lex Iulia iudiciorum publicorum. Vor diesem Hintergrund entstehen nämlich Zweifel besonders hinsichtlich des Charakters der Berechtigungen oder der Freistellungen im Bereich der gegenseitigen Aussagen im Zusammenhang mit der Relation, die auf naher Verwandtschaft Eltern – Kinder oder dem Patronat, wie auch der Ehe beruhte.
6
Condorelli, Orazio. "Condorelli, Orazio, I foedera pacis e il principio pacta sunt servanda. Note di ricerca nel pensiero dei giuristi dei secoli XII–XV." Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung 105, no. 1 (June 26, 2019): 55–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2019-0003.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The foedera pacis and the principle pacta sunt servanda. Researches on the doctrines of medieval jurists (12th–15th c.). The foedera pacis (peace accords) belong to the core of the fundamental themes of the ius gentium. Some passages of Isidore from Seville and Augustine, handed down in Gratian's Decretum, and some fragments contained in Justinian's Digest (Gaius, Hermogenianus, Ulpianus) were the main sources on which the medieval jurists elaborated their doctrines concerning the foundations of the foedera pacis (pactum and fides) and the effects arising from these premises. The doctrines of medieval jurists on the foedera pacis represent one of the roots that nourished the reflections of the Fathers of modern international law (Grotius' thought is here examined).
7
Ankum, Hans. "Ulpianus, Papinianus en kleinere fragmenten, vertaald door J. E. Spruit en Κ. Ε. M. Bongenaar." Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 110, no. 1 (August 1, 1993): 690–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.7767/zrgra.1993.110.1.690.
Full text
8
Szolc-Nartowski, Bartosz. "UDZIAŁ OSÓB NIEUPRAWNIONYCH W WYDANIU ORZECZENIA W POSTĘPOWANIU CYWILNYM - UWAGI NA TLE D.1,14,3 I D.41,3,44 PR." Zeszyty Prawnicze 6, no. 2 (June 22, 2017): 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2006.6.2.07.
Full textAbstract:
Participation of Unauthorised Persons in Issuance of Decisions in Civil Proceedings - Remarks on the Basis D. 1,14,3 and D. 41,3,44 pr.SummaryAccording to Polish civil procedure a sentence given by an unauthorized person is invalid. This was not always the case in ancien Roman law. Ulpianus declared that when a slave, who escaped from his master, became a praetor, his acts were valid. He took into consideration serious problems of those who had put their trust in the praetor’s office as well as the respect for humanitas. A basic common sense requires that what was well decided, should be considered valid. According to the author, Ulpianus realized that the rule of ius civile which determined the requirements for entering in a praetor’s duties had the character of a guarantee. If the purpose, for which this rule was established, was achieved, such acts should be accepted as valid.The question arises whether that approach could be applied to contemporary cases of iudex incompetens. Furthermore, whether it would be justifiable to extend this solution to other - not only procedural – but also material, guarantee rules?The answer is not easy. In D. 41,3,44 pr., a pater familias conducted the procedure of adrogation (adoption) improperly. Papinianus decided that, although pater familias made a justifiable mistake, all that the son enacted in the name of the father, was invalid. Nevertheless a different rule, as the jurist says in D. 41,3,44 pr., must be observed in the case of homo liber bona fide serviens - a person, who being unaware of his free man status, served as a slave. Actions taken by such a person were valid (the purchaser of a slave had to be protected), since transactions of that kind happened very often. More importantly, any other solution would be against the public interest. O n the other hand, it was very rare for a pater familias to wrongly adrogate, therefore the example of pater familias did not create a general rule.It seems quite difficult to indicate one principle which could be applied to all the guarantee rules. As far as the case of an unauthorized person giving sentence is concerned, the Roman private law shows that the regard for the public interest may sometimes justify solutions different from those preferred by Polish law.
9
Sadowski, Piotr. "FILOZOFIA PRAWA W ŻYCIU I NAUCZANIU ULPIANA." Zeszyty Prawnicze 8, no. 1 (June 23, 2017): 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2008.8.1.04.
Full textAbstract:
The Philosophy of Law in Ulpian’s Life and TeachingSummaryThe purpose of this article, is to show, taking into account Ulpian’s life and teaching, that the Roman jurisprudence was interwoven with some elements of philosophy. The first part of the article illustrates the influence of Ulpian’s life history on his philosophical and legislative views, whereas the second part presents the latter.His knowledge of law, the posts which he occupied, and numerous works prove that Ulpian was preoccupied with studying „law through its first causes”. He asked about the essence of the law, about what the natural law is, and what justice is. He described the juridical reality using the language of law and philosophy. His concept of lawfulness can be perceived as integral, combining material and formal legality He did not depart from the ethical dimension of law although he respected the rigours of the formalised norms. Referring to aequitas did not disturb him in paying attention to certitudo legalis. In his concept of lawfulness one can see a reference to Cyceron’s ideas and in his concept of natural law one can observe a reference to the Stoics. In the field of the penal lawfulness one can perceive Ulpian as a precursor of the ability to perceive the human equality in the sphere of natural law, the concept elaborated as late as several centuries afterwards. Perceiving the equality of people, approximates him to the Christian’s philosophical idea.
10
Tarwacka, Anna. "STATUS PIRATÓW W ŚWIETLE RZYMSKIEGO PRAWA PUBLICZNEGO I IUS GENTIUM." Zeszyty Prawnicze 5, no. 2 (June 14, 2017): 87. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2005.5.2.04.
Full textAbstract:
The Status of the Pirates in the Light of the Roman Public Law and ius gentiumSummaryThe Roman law of war was extremely strict and formal. To declare a war (bellum iustum) it was necessary to perform a certain ceremony traditionally conducted by the fetiales.According to Cicero, a campaign against the pirates was not considered bellum iustum due to the fact that they could not be called hostes legitimi. The reason for such opinion was that their community could not be defined as a state. Cicero claims that the pirates were enemies of all mankind (communis hostis omnium). The jurists of the classical period (Pomponius, Ulpianus) shared this view calling those, who did not fulfill the conditions of gaining the status of hostes legitimi, simply bandits - latrunculi. Accordingly, a general who won a campaign against the pirates could not celebrate a triumph, which was a ceremony reserved for more splendid victories.Roman classical law considered people captured by the pirates free. They did not lose any of their rights and did not need to use ius postliminii to regain their status.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Ulpianus"
1
Escobar, Rozas Freddy. "Ulpian’s offer: The subjective value of the patrimonial nature of the contract." THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho, 2015. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/107264.
Full textAbstract:
With respect to the patrimonial nature of thecontract, derived from the patrimonial nature of the benefit, a lot has been written and proposed. Authors from different periods andwith different ideas have addressed the subject, since it is fundamental to understand thebasic concepts of obligation and contractualrelationship. The stance of the majority findsthe foundation of the patrimonial nature of the benefit in being a limit to private autonomy,since such nature, which is susceptible ofeconomic value, is defined by the social context,and not by the parties.In this article, the author rejects and discusses the mentioned stance. Based on the liberty that each person has to determine what is more convenient for himself and what is more efficient in economic terms, the author defends a subjective vision of the patrimonial nature of the contractual relation, and gives a different function and foundation to the patrimonial nature of the benefit: Being essential for the calculation of the compensation in case of breach.Respecto a la patrimonialidad del contrato,derivada de la patrimonialidad de la prestación, se ha escrito y propuesto mucho. Autores de diversas épocas e ideas han tocado eltema, siendo fundamental para entender los conceptos básicos de obligación y relacióncontractual. La postura mayoritaria encuentra el fundamento de la patrimonialidad dela prestación en ser un límite a la autonomía privada, ya que lo patrimonial, aquello susceptible de valor económico, no lo definen laspartes, si no el contexto social.En el presente artículo, el autor rechaza y discute dicha postura. Basándose en la libertad que tiene cada persona de definir lo más conveniente para sí y lo más eficiente en términos económicos, defiende una visión subjetiva de la patrimonialidad de la relación contractual y le da a la patrimonialidad de la prestación una función y un fundamento diferente: El ser indispensable para el cálculo de la indemnización en caso de incumplimiento.
2
Hajdari, Arben. "Ulpiana et la romanisation de la Dardanie." Thesis, Grenoble, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013GRENH036.
Full textAbstract:
Ce thème de doctorat a été réalisé en cadre d'une convention de cotutelle réalisé entre l'Université Pierre Mendès Franca, Grenoble 2 et l'Université de Prishtina. L'habitat d'Ulpiana un oppidum quasi inconnu dans la Dardanie préromaine, après son invasion de la part des romains, devient un centre important politique, économique et culturel pour toute la Dardanie. Cette étude traitera l'historique du développement de la ville depuis sa fondation et jusqu'à son abandon, et montre une réflexion générale sur la base de données de nos jours qu'offrent les sources littéraires, épigraphiques, numismatiques et les résultats des rapports de fouilles archéologiques. Après son élévation au rang de municipium durant le règne de l'empereur Trajan, Ulpiana connait un agrandissement et un grand développement grâce à sa position géostratégique favorable qu'elle possédait en se situant dans un carrefour de routes importantes qui liait l'est avec l'ouest et surtout grâce aux richesses et aux nombreuses réserves minérales qu'elle possédait lesquelles étaient si importantes durant cette époque pour la stabilité économique de l'empire romain. Elle est devenue très vite l'un des centres gravitationnels le plus importants de toute la province de Moesie, en devenant un centre autant important de la propagation de la nouvelle mode de vie chez la population indigène. Ulpiana, mais aussi les autres centres urbains comme Scupi, Naissus ect, ont joués un rôle important dans le processus de la romanisation qui comprenait toute la population autochtone après l'invasion des romains. Dans ce travail de doctorat fut faite une synthèse générale du processus de la romanisation en Dardanie en soulignant les questions comme ; les enjeux de pouvoir, l'urbanisation, les aspects socio-économiques, les aspects culturels, les portées de la romanisation, la romanisation comme acculturation acceptée par les indignes et la résistance à la romanisation. Cette étude montre un traitement monographique global de l'histoire du développement de l'un des habitats le plus important de KosovaThis dissertation has been written based on an agreement (cotutelle) between Université Pierre Mendès Franca, Grenoble 2 and University of Prishtina. The Ulpiana settlement, an oppidum almost unknown in the pre-Roman Dardania, turns into a significant political, economic and cultural centre, after the Roman invasion. This study deals with the history of the development of the city, covering its establishment until its abandonment. Also, the study provides a general overview based on data from literary, epigraphic, numismatic sources as well as archaeological excavations. Upon its rise to the rank of municip, under the rule of Emperor Trajan, Ulpiana faces a swift growth thanks to its favourable geostrategic position on the very important crossroads linking the east and the west, but also because of its wealthy mineral reserves, which in turn were very necessary in ensuring the economic stability of the Empire. Ulpiana will soon turn into one of the most important provinces of Moesia, and in the process it also became a significant centre from where the new way of life diffused to the rest of the native population. Together with the rest of the urban centres like Scupi and Naissus, Ulpiana played an important role in the process of Romanization of the native population, after the Roman invasion. In this dissertation we have presented a comprehensive synthesis of the Romanization process in Dardania by highlighting issues such as: certain policy aspects, urbanization, socio-economic and cultural situation, extension of the process of Romanization as well as the reception of such a process by the natives and the resistance. This study presents a monographic discussion of the overall history of one of the most important dwellings in Kosovo
3
Guida, Neto José. "Ulpiano e o estoicismo no direito romano do principado." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2012. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5996.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:21:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Jose Guida Neto.pdf: 751785 bytes, checksum: c503791b85704d402e158e36682dbcbf (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-10-19This thesis seeks to demonstrate how, in the Principate (High Roman Empire - the classic period from 27 BC to 284 AD), Stoic philosophy, absorbed by the sovereign of Rome, influenced the Roman law. As a guiding principle, we use the work of the jurist Ulpian in particular its Liber Singularis Regularum and the Title I of Book I from the Digesta of the Justinian I the Great, emperor of Easten Roman Empire. The history of the Principate is presented, preceded by the reasons that led to the end of the Republic, and gave rise this kind of Roman monarchy. After the presention of the history of the period, there is an explanation of Stoic thought, with emphasis on the last phase of this ancient school of philosophy, precisely the one that coincides with the Principate, and represents the pinnacle of Latin philosophical thought. Once the history of the period is presented together with the history of philosophy, then it is shown how classical Roman law absorbed these ideas that were found in legal texts of the jurist Ulpian. Completing the thesis, there is an explanation on how Ulpian s philosophy of justice was transmitted by means of the consolidation of Emperor Justinian "Corpus Juris Civilis" , thereby contributing to the formation of the Western civilization and, consequently, becoming the basis of Brazilian law
A presente tese busca demonstrar de que modo, durante o Principado (Alto- Império Romano - período clássico de 27 a.C. até 284 d.C), a filosofia estóica, absorvida pelos soberanos de Roma, influenciou o Direito Romano. Como fio condutor do trabalho usa-se a obra do jurisconsulto Ulpiano, em particular o título I do livro I do Digesto (do Imperador Justiniano I o Grande, Imperador Romano do Oriente) e seu livro de Regras . Faz-se um relato da história do Principado, antecedido dos motivos que culminaram com o fim da República e ensejaram esse gênero de monarquia romana. À história do período segue-se uma explanação do pensamento estóico com ênfase na última fase antiga de tal escola filosófica, justamente aquela que coincide com o Principado e representa o auge do pensamento filosófico latino. Posta a história do período, e, sobreposta a história da filosofia de então, procura-se demonstrar como o direito romano clássico absorveu tais ideais que são encontrados nos textos legais do jurisconsulto Ulpiano. Por fim, segue uma explanação de como a jus filosofia de Ulpiano foi transmitida graças à consolidação justinianeia do Corpus Juris Civilis e desse modo contribuindo com a formação da civilização ocidental e consequentemente tornando-se a base do Direito brasileiro
4
Nogrady, Alexander [Verfasser]. "Römisches Strafrecht nach Ulpian. : Buch 7 bis 9 De officio proconsulis. / Alexander Nogrady." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2011. http://d-nb.info/1238355129/34.
Full text
5
Westner, Katrin [Verfasser], Gerhard [Gutachter] Brey, and Sabine [Gutachter] Klein. "Roman mining and metal production near the antique city of Ulpiana (Kosovo) / Katrin Westner ; Gutachter: Gerhard Brey, Sabine Klein." Frankfurt am Main : Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg, 2017. http://d-nb.info/1128229536/34.
Full text
6
Lazayrat, Emmanuel. "La connaissance des choses divines et des choses humaines dans la "iuris prudentia"." Thesis, Lyon 3, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014LYO30023.
Full textAbstract:
La iuris prudentia ou « prudence du droit » désignait le savoir des jurisconsultes romains. Bien que son importance soit capitale pour l’histoire de notre droit, nous n’en connaissons qu’une seule et unique définition inscrite aux Institutes et au Digeste de l’empereur Justinien. L’auteur originaire en serait Ulpien qui définit cette « jurisprudence » comme « la connaissance des choses divines et humaines, la science du juste et de l’injuste » (iuris prudentia est diuinarum atque humanarum rerum notitia, iusti atque iniusti scientia). Face à cette définition, les commentateurs ont souvent considéré que seul le second élément (« la science du juste et de l’injuste ») formait le véritable critère épistémologique de la science juridique en cause, diminuant ainsi la fonction de la connaissance des choses divines et humaines (diuinarum atque humanarum notitia). Or, nous pensons qu’au contraire cette rerum notitia n’est pas un simple accessoire rhétorique mais qu’elle réfère à une forme éminente du savoir antique : la sagesse. Forme suprême de l’intelligence et du vécu antique, elle n’est pas le fruit particulier d’une école philosophique ou d’une pensée religieuse. Relative à un savoir générique, la référence à la « sagesse » dans la définition de la iuris prudentia désigne la pensée même du jurisconsulte. Car comment abstraire les règles (regulae) depuis les cas (res) sans une médiation intellective entre les choses et le droit ? Comment opérer le choix entre le juste et l’injuste sans une forme de savoir conceptuel ? Toute science a besoin d’une théorie de la connaissance pour fonder sa méthode. Toutefois, la iuris prudentia dont l’objet était le droit d’une cité devenu empire, ne pouvait faire reposer sa pensée sur une doctrine philosophique déterminée. De même, léguée par les jurisconsultes païens aux princes législateurs chrétiens, elle ne pouvait se définir à travers le prisme d’une religion particulière. Or, la référence à la sagesse, but suprême de la connaissance, permet de neutraliser les différences dogmatiques pour faire ainsi de la « prudence du droit » la seule connaissance antique véritablement universelle. Ce qui explique selon nous que cette fameuse iuris prudentia connaîtra une longue postérité qui fera la fortune historique de la sagesse du droit d’origine romaine dont nous ressentons encore aujourd’hui les échos dans notre propre système juridiqueThe iuris prudentia or wisdom in matters of law referred to Roman jurists’ knowledge. Even though its importance was primordial for the history of our law, we only know one and unique definition written in the Institutes and inside Emperor Justinian’s Digest. The original author could be Ulpian who defines this jurisprudence as “the awareness of divine and human things, knowledge of what is just or unjust” (iuris prudentia is diuinarum atque humanarum rerum notitia, iusti atque iniusti scientia). Faced with this definition, many critics have often considered that only the second element (knowledge of what is just and unjust) formed the genuine epistemic criteria of the legal science in question, thus decreasing the duty of the knowledge in divine and human things (diuinarum atque humanarum notitia). On the contrary, we believe that this rerum notitia is not only a simple rhetorical accessory but it refers to an eminent antique knowledge: wisdom. As the ultimate form of the antique intelligence and background, it is not the particular result of a philosophical school or a religious thought. Relating to a generic knowledge, reference to “wisdom” in the definition of iuris prudentia refers to Roman jurist real thinking. Indeed how to allow for abstract rules (regulae) for cases (res) without a spiritual mediation between things and the law? How to operate a choice between just and unjust without a kind of ideational knowledge? Every science needs a theory of knowledge to have a basis for its method. Nevertheless, the iuris prudentia (whose purpose was the law of a city-state which became an empire) was not able to base its way of thinking on a determined philosophical doctrine. Likewise, bequeathed by pagan Roman jurists to Christian Imperators, it could not define itself through the prism of a particular religion. Yet reference to wisdom, the ultimate goal of knowledge, allows neutralizing dogmatic differences. Wisdom in matters of law is the only truly universal antique knowledge. This therefore makes it clear to us why iuris prudentia will continue to have such an influence in posterity and why we still hear echos today of a legal system established by the Romans. [Tr. PHILIPPE JULLIEN]
7
Nay, Jamie P. "Citizenship, culture and ideology in Roman Greece." Thesis, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/217.
Full textAbstract:
A study of the cultural and ideological effects of Roman citizenship on Greeks living in the first three centuries AD. The ramifications of the extension of citizenship to these Greeks illustrates that ideas such as 'culture' and 'identity' are not static terms, but constructions of a particular social milieu at any given point in time. Roman citizenship functioned as a kind of ideological apparatus that, when given to a non-Roman, questioned that individual's native identity. This thesis addresses, via an examination of four sources, all of whom were Greeks with Roman citizenship - Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Paul in the Acts of the Apostles, Ulpian, the minters of eastern civic coins - the extent to which one could remain 'Greek' while participating in one of the most Roman institutions of the Empire. Utilizing these sources with the aid of a number of theoretical bases (notably Louis Althusser and Pierre Bourdieu), this study attempts to come to a conclusion about the nature of 'Romanness' in the ancient world.
Books on the topic "Ulpianus"
6
Mercogliano, Felice. Tituli ex corpore Ulpiani: Storia di un testo. Napoli: Jovene, 1997.
Find full text
7
Pessi, Maria Vittoria Giangrieco. Ricerche sull'actio de pauperie: Dalle XII tavole ad Ulpiano. Napoli: E. Jovene, 1995.
Find full text
8
Gaius. The commentaries of Gaius and Rules of Ulpian. 3rd ed. Clark, N.J: Lawbook Exchange, 2005.
Find full text
9
Nogrady, Alexander. Römisches Strafrecht nach Ulpian: Buch 7 bis 9 De officio proconsulis. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2006.
Find full text
10
Miglietta, Massimo. Elaborazione di Ulpiano e di Paolo intorno al "certum dicere" nell'"Edictum 'generale' de iniuriis". Lecce: Argo, 2002.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Ulpianus"
1
Waldstein, Wolfgang. "Zur juristischen Relevanz der Gerechtigkeit bei Aristoteles, Cicero und Ulpian." In Rechtsethik, 1–71. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6576-8_1.
Full text
2
Mantovani, Dario. "Aspects of the Critical Edition of Roman Juristic Works. The Example of Ulpian's De Officio Proconsulis." In Jurists and Legal Science in the History of Roman Law, 235–60. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429319266-12.
Full text
3
"3 The Anglo-Norman Ordo iudiciarius: Pseudo-Ulpianus, De edendo." In Order in the Court: Medieval Procedural Treatises in Translation, 112–71. BRILL, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004315327_005.
Full text
4
Honoré, Tony. "Background and Career." In Ulpian, 1–36. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244249.003.0001.
Full text
5
Honoré, Tony. "The Oral Style." In Ulpian, 37–75. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244249.003.0002.
Full text
6
Honoré, Tony. "The Cosmopolis and Human Rights." In Ulpian, 76–93. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244249.003.0003.
Full text
7
Honoré, Tony. "The Empirical Method." In Ulpian, 94–104. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244249.003.0004.
Full text
8
Honoré, Tony. "Genuine Works." In Ulpian, 105–25. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244249.003.0005.
Full text
9
Honoré, Tony. "Sources and Scholarship." In Ulpian, 126–57. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244249.003.0006.
Full text
10
Honoré, Tony. "Dates and Plan I: On the Edict." In Ulpian, 158–76. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244249.003.0007.
Full text