Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / UNCITRAL model law / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: UNCITRAL model law.

Journal articles on the topic 'UNCITRAL model law'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 11 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'UNCITRAL model law.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Knieper, Judith. "The Making of the UNCITRAL Mediation Framework." BCDR International Arbitration Review 6, Issue 2 (December 1, 2019): 239–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2019002.

Full text

Abstract:

The UNCITRAL mediation framework consists of the United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation, also known as the Singapore Convention on Mediation, the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Mediation and International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation, 2018 (amending the Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation, 2002) and the Conciliation Rules.The UNCITRAL mediation framework will be supplemented by updated mediation rules as well as notes on mediation, which are currently on UNCITRAL’s agenda. This framework is the result of the typical inclusive and transparent UNCITRAL drafting process and will hopefully contribute to the strengthening of mediation worldwide and make it an attractive and flexible dispute resolution tool.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Gautama, S. "Model UU Arbitrase Dagang Internasional dari PBB." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 16, no. 6 (June 14, 2017): 605. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol16.no6.1235.

Full text

Abstract:

UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law), Panitia PBB tentang Hukum Dagang Internasional, pada tanggal 21 Juni 1985 telah menerima suatu Model Undang-undang tentang hukum Arbitrase Dagang lnternasional. Karya dari UNCITRAL ini dipandang sebagaipelengkap daripada UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (Kaidah-kaidah Arbitrase dari UNCITRAL) dan UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Teh, Stephanie, and João Ribeiro. "The Time for a New Arbitration Law in China: Comparing the Arbitration Law in China with the UNCITRAL Model Law." Journal of International Arbitration 34, Issue 3 (July 1, 2017): 459–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2017023.

Full text

Abstract:

As China consolidates its position as one of the most important trade players in the international market, arbitration has become an attractive alternative to litigation in commercial disputes between Chinese companies and their foreign trade partners. The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985, with amendments as adopted in 2006, represents the accepted international legislative standard for a modern arbitration law. In order to make China an attractive seat for international commercial arbitration and enhance the efficiency of the arbitration system for the benefit of commercial parties, whether Chinese or foreign, it is important for China to consider adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law. This article provides an overview of the UNCITRAL Model Law and its positive impact on the development of arbitration in several jurisdictions worldwide. Next, the benefits of legal reform are highlighted through a contrast between China’s current Arbitration Law and the UNCITRAL Model Law. Finally, this article lays out a procedural roadmap through which China’s legal framework may be amended to incorporate the UNCITRAL Model Law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Abdullah Bawazir, Omar Saleh, and Mohammad Azam Hussain. "The Qualifications of Arbitral Tribunal: Perspectives of Shariah Law and UNCITRAL Model Law." Journal of Social Sciences Research, SPI6 (December 30, 2018): 1213–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi6.1213.1217.

Full text

Abstract:

Arbitration is an alternative mechanism which can be adopted by the parties involved in any legal issues other than the court. Arbitral tribunal plays essential role and has roles and functions similar to the court judges. Only qualified person is eligible to be appointed as arbitrator. From Islamic perspective, the Muslim jurists have laid down several requirements to be fulfilled by such person before the appointment has been made. The UNCITRAL Model Law which is internationally adopted by most of the countries in the world in setting up their arbitration institution also has a provision pertaining to the qualifications of arbitral tribunal. The question arises, what are the qualifications required under Shariah law and prescribed by UNCITRAL Model Law? Is there any similarities? Based on such research questions, this article seeks to analyse the qualifications of the arbitral tribunal from the perspectives of Shariah law and UNCITRAL Model Law. Based on the library data, content analysis method is adopted to compare the qualifications of arbitral tribunal from both perspective. This study found that, the Shariah law and UNCITRAL Model Law have its own requirements for the person to be appointed as arbitrator. The study also found that, Shariah law provides more details in this regard compared to UNCITRAL Model Law which provides only the general principles.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Liebscher, C. "Austria adopts the UNCITRAL Model Law." Arbitration International 23, no. 4 (December 1, 2007): 523–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/23.4.523.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Croft, C. "Australia Adopts the UNCITRAL Model Law." Arbitration International 5, no. 2 (June 1, 1989): 189–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/5.2.189.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ahmad, Jawad, and Paul Tan. "The UNCITRAL Model Law and Awards infra petita." Journal of International Arbitration 31, Issue 3 (June 1, 2014): 413–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2014017.

Full text

Abstract:

There is an abundance of scholarly writing on the UNCITRAL Model Law and arbitral tribunals rendering decisions on issues beyond the parties' submissions (ultra petita).The same cannot be said where the arbitral tribunal fails to decide on the issues submitted by the parties (infra petita). In BLB and another v. BLC and others [2013] S.G.H.C. 196, a Singapore High Court decision, the court set aside an award infra petita under Article 34(2)(a)(iii) of the UNCITRAL Model Law and Section 24(b) of the Singapore International Arbitration Act (Cap. 143A). The ruling raises interesting issues that warrant a closer inspection of the UNCITRAL Model Law and awards infra petita. This article addresses two questions. First, which of the Article 34(2) grounds under the UNCITRAL Model Law do awards infra petita fall under? Second, is making a request for an additional award under Article 33(3) a prerequisite to apply to set aside an award under Article 34(2)? These questions are addressed and analyzed pursuant to the Singapore High Court ruling in BLB and another v. BLC and others [2013] S.G.H.C. 196 and to the drafting history of the UNCITRAL Model Law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Bao, Chiann. "Return to Reason: Reigning in Runaway Due Process Claims." Journal of International Arbitration 38, Issue 1 (January 1, 2021): 59–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2021003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Sadah, Muhammad Abu, and Simon Norton. "The Application of Uncitral Model Law Principles in the Middle East Region." Arab Law Quarterly 22, no. 3 (2008): 219–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157302508x336601.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThis article presents an empirical analysis of the impact of the enforcement of substantive UNCITRAL Model Law principles in the Middle East region. Despite the main differences in the schools of thought and jurisdictions in the Middle East, the major conclusion is that UNCITRAL principles are applicable. As compared with data taken from legislations and case law after adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law, in an extension of the analysis, findings show a marginally significant change and deviations from the basic principles of the Model Law in these countries. Analysis of the implications of these changes from the perspective of the role played by the Model Law, shows that there was significant theoretical and practical negative impact upon the overall objectives of the law enforcement effort.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Mantilla-Serrano, Fernando. "Colombia Enacts a New International Arbitration Law." Journal of International Arbitration 30, Issue 4 (August 1, 2013): 431–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2013027.

Full text

Abstract:

By enacting Law 1563 of 12 July 2012, Colombia has established an international commercial arbitration regime based on the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law. The deviations which the Colombian legislature has made from the UNCITRAL Model Law are the subject of the present article.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Neill, P. "New Zealand and the UNCITRAL Model Law." Arbitration International 6, no. 3 (September 1, 1990): 271–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/6.3.271.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Lionnet, K. "The UNCITRAL Model Law: A German Perspective." Arbitration International 6, no. 4 (December 1, 1990): 343–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/6.4.343.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Rogers, A. "The UNCITRAL Model Law: An Australian Perspective." Arbitration International 6, no. 4 (December 1, 1990): 348–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/6.4.348.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

John Sutton, D. S. "Hong Kong Enacts the UNCITRAL Model Law." Arbitration International 6, no. 4 (December 1, 1990): 358–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/6.4.358.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Herrmann, Gerold. "The Uncitral Arbitration Law: a Good Model of a Model Law." Uniform Law Review 3, no. 2-3 (April 1, 1998): 483–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ulr/3.2-3.483.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Piers, Maud, and Dirk De Meulemeester. "The New Arbitration Law Belgium Adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law." Asian International Arbitration Journal 9, Issue 2 (November 1, 2013): 147–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/aiaj2013009.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

van Ginkel, Eric. "The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation." Journal of International Arbitration 21, Issue 1 (February 1, 2004): 1–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2004001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Yulin, Zhang. "Towards the UNCITRAL Model Law- A Chinese Perspective." Journal of International Arbitration 11, Issue 1 (March 1, 1994): 87–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia1994004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Gabriel, Henry D. "The UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records." Uniform Law Review 24, no. 2 (June 1, 2019): 261–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unz013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Saxby, J. "A user's perspective of the UNCITRAL Model Law." Arbitration International 2, no. 2 (April 1, 1986): 164–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/2.2.164.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Burman, Harold S. "United Nations: Uncitral Model Law on Electronic Commerce." International Legal Materials 36, no. 1 (January 1997): 197–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s002078290001891x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Eiselen, Sieg. "The Adoption of UNCITRAL Instruments to Fast Track Regional Integration of Commercial Law." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 12, Issue 46 (May 1, 2015): 82–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2015025.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT: The United Nations Commission for International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has adopted and is promoting a number of texts for the harmonization of international trade law such as the 1980 Vienna Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and the 1974 New York Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods. There are also newer instruments which have not yet gained such wide acceptance that may be considered for adoption such as the 2005 UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts, the 1996 UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce and the 1997 UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. This paper will identify and discuss the UNCITRAL texts that may be most useful to fast track the regional harmonization and integration of commercial law. The paper will discuss the experience with these instruments internationally, more specifically the experience with the CISG and the Model Law on Electronic Commerce. The paper will critically examine the value of such harmonizing instruments. The paper will also outline critical success factors for regional legal harmonization and integration based on the experience with the UNCITRAL documents. Finally it will be argued that a number of these instruments are suitable for adoption in countries in order to facilitate regional integration.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Ramadani, Tamara Mutiara, and Rizka Nurliyantika. "TANDA TANGAN ELEKTRONIK DALAM KONTRAK BISNIS INTERNASIONAL." SOL JUSTICIA 5, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 87–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.54816/sj.v5i1.479.

Full text

Abstract:

Kontrak bisnis internasional merupakan pedoman bersama para pihak yang mengikatkan diri atas hak dan kewajiban tertentu serta melintasi bats negara. Pedoman tersebut biasanya berhubungan erat dengan transaksi perdagangan, yang pada saat ini bisa dilakukan secara jarak jauh atau elektronik. Proses perdagangan secara elektronik sebagai sarana transaksi tanpa tatap muka antara pembeli dan penjual hingga munculnya tanda tangan elektronik. Lembaga yang sampai saat ini berperan dalam mengharmonisasi hukum transaksi perdagangan elektronik ialah United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) yang merupakan subsidiary organs Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB). Pengaturan khusus terhadap tanda tangan elektronik secara internasional terdapat pada UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce 1996 dan UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signature 2001. Dilihat dari terbentuknya peraturan-peraturan secara internasional ini menandakan bahwa masyarakat internasional sangat membutuhkan peraturan yang sesuai dengan perkembangan teknologi terutama dibidang transaksi-transaksi perdagangan internasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui metode studi pustaka. Masalah yang diangkat adalah bagimana hukum kontrak internasional mengatur tanda tangan elektronik dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi pengguna tanda tangan elektronik. Dari dua pertanyaan tersebut didapati kedua Model Law dari UNCITRAL tidak mengikat negara. Negara bebas untuk mengikuti seluruh isi aturan, sebagian, atau bahkan menolak keseluruhan. Model Law menjadi pedoman untuk membantu negara-negara di dalam membuat perundangan nasionalnya. Selanjutnya aturan yang dibuat oleh ICC, ICSID dan UNCITRAL diyakini dapat menjadi pemecah masalah terkait dengan kontrak bisnis internasional termasuk dengan topik tanda tangan elektronik. Meski dalam Model Law juga telah di bahas bagaimana tanda tangan elektronik dapat berlaku untuk mendukung perdagangan elektronik.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Asnil, Dicky Moallavi. "UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency Sebagai Model Pengaturan Kepailitan Lintas Batas Indonesia dalam Integrasi Ekonomi ASEAN." Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (March 11, 2019): 323–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.2.323-346.

Full text

Abstract:

The economic integration program between the members of Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) and surrounding areas that trancends national borders and citizenship potentially creates the cross borders bankrupcy problems. The problem was born when the debtor undergoing bankruptcy process has assets abroad,where the bankruptcy proceedings are hampered by the laws of the country concerned. In adition, Indonesia and ASEAN do not yet a bankruptcy regulation that binds its member states in the settlement of this problems. UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment is a model of cross-border insolvency law made by The United Nations which aims to be a reference of the world countries in the business of modernization and harmonization of national bankruptcy law respectively. This article shows that UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment which adheres to this flexibility principle can be used as a solution to modernize and harmonize bankruptcy law of ASEAN countries, especially Indonesia. Abstrak Program integrasi ekonomi antar negara anggota Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) dan sekitarnya yang melampaui batas-batas negara dan kewarganegaraan saat ini berpotensi melahirkan permasalahan kepailitan lintas batas. Permasalahan itu lahir pada saat debitor yang menjalani proses kepailitan di suatu negara memiliki aset di luar negeri, di mana proses kepailitan terhadap aset pailit itu terhambat oleh hukum yang berlaku di negara bersangkutan. Indonesia dan ASEAN sampai saat ini belum memiliki peraturan kepailitan yang mengikat negara anggotanya dalam penyelesaian permasalahan ini. UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment adalah sebuah model hukum kepailitan lintas batas yang dibuat oleh Persatuan Bangsa-Bangsa yang bertujuan untuk menjadi rujukan negara-negara dunia dalam usaha modernisasi dan harmonisasi hukum kepailitan nasional masing-masing. Artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment yang menganut prinsip fleksibilitas dapat dijadikan solusi dalam upaya melakukan modernisasi dan harmonisasi hukum kepailitan negara-negara ASEAN, khususnya Indonesia.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Arrowsmith, Sue. "Public Procurement: An Appraisal of the Uncitral Model Law as a Global Standard." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 53, no. 1 (January 2004): 17–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclq/53.1.17.

Full text

Abstract:

The UNCITRAL Model Law on Procurement of Goods, Construction and Services,1 adopted in 1993/4, provides a template for reforming regulatory systems on public procurement. A decade on, UNCITRAL is now considering a review.2 This is timely for several reasons, not least because of new purchasing practices, especially in electronic procurement, and the increasing need for harmonization with other international norms. In this context, the present article offers a critical appraisal of the Model Law as a global standard for public procurement.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Chernykh, Yuliya S. "International Commercial Arbitration in Ukraine: Details Do Matter." Journal of International Arbitration 26, Issue 2 (April 1, 2009): 301–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2009016.

Full text

Abstract:

Being a UNCITRAL Model Law country and a signatory to the New York Convention, Ukraine has a regime generally favourable to international commercial arbitration. However, some peculiarities outside of the original scope of the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention do exist in Ukraine, which may surprise foreign practitioners. The present article briefly discusses those special features of international commercial arbitration in Ukraine relating to arbitrability, evidentiary practice, recognition and enforcement of awards.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

., Sefriani. "INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE LAW ON CROSS INSOLVENSI UNCITRAL MODEL." Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 8, no. 1 (April 28, 2019): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v0ixx.27858.

Full text

Abstract:

<p>Legal problems due to cross border insolvency are increasingly complex. The United Nations has issued the 1997 Model Law on Cross border Insolvency (CBI) to help countries solve their CBI problems. However, this model law is not effective because very few countries adopted it. The legal problem studied is why very few countries adopted the model law and how to overcome the ineffectiveness of the model law. The results of the study indicate that the lack of adoption of the model law caused by: the model law is only a non-binding legislative text; Too much flexibility encourages deviations from the provisions; do not want to reduce their sovereignty, status quo, international cooperation recommended by the model law is not always of primary interest, and many countries have been bound by international agreements on regional CBI which are considered more relevant than the model law. The solutions that can be suggested to overcome the ineffectiveness of the model law on CBI are national bankruptcy laws mechanism; the International Treaties and Conventions mechanism; Rules, Regulations, Principles and Guidelines mechanisms and protocol or adhoc agreements.</p><p>Treaties and Conventions; mekanisme Rules, Regulations, Principles and Guidelinesan dan mekanisme pembuatan protocol atau adhoc agreement.</p><p>Kata kunci: model law; kepailitan lintas batas negara; adopsi</p><br clear="all" /><p> </p>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Burnard, R. "The New Zealand Law Commission's Report on the UNCITRAL Model Law." Arbitration International 8, no. 3 (September 1, 1992): 281–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/8.3.281.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Gabriel, Henry D. "Erratum: THE UNCITRAL model law on electronic transferable records." Uniform Law Review 24, no. 3 (August 1, 2019): 605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unz024.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Steyn, J. "England's Response to the UNCITRAL Model Law of Arbitration." Arbitration International 10, no. 1 (March 1, 1994): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/10.1.1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Uff QC, J., and D. Keating QC. "Should England Reconsider the UNCITRAL Model Law or Not?" Arbitration International 10, no. 2 (June 1, 1994): 179–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/10.2.179.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Pillay, M. R. "The Singapore Arbitration Regime and the UNCITRAL Model Law." Arbitration International 20, no. 4 (December 1, 2004): 355–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/20.4.355.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Gillis Wetter, J. "The Mustill Committee Report on the UNCITRAL Model Law." Arbitration International 6, no. 3 (September 1, 1990): 268–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/6.3.268.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Schwartz, Eric A. "The ICC Arbitration Rules and the UNCITRAL Model Law." Arbitration International 9, no. 3 (September 1, 1993): 231–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/9.3.231.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Cohen, N. B. "Should UNCITRAL Prepare a Model Law on Secured Transactions?" Uniform Law Review - Revue de droit uniforme 15, no. 2 (April 1, 2010): 325–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ulr/15.2.325.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Rashed, S. S. "The UNCITRAL Model Law and Recent Developments in Egypt." ICSID Review 3, no. 1 (March 1, 1988): 126–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/3.1.126.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Harmer, R. W. "Documentation B. uncitral model law on cross-border insolvency." International Insolvency Review 6, no. 2 (1997): 145–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iir.3940060206.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Amalia, Jihan. "URGENSI IMPLEMENTASI UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY DI INDONESIA: STUDI KOMPARASI HUKUM KEPAILITAN LINTAS BATAS INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA." Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 2, no. 2 (July 12, 2019): 162. http://dx.doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v2i2.2499.

Full text

Abstract:

Dalam era globalisasi, perdagangan tak lagi hanya dilakukan dalam satu wilayah negara, melainkan dapat pula antarnegara. Perkembangan bisnis internasional beriringan dengan kebutuhan akan hukum yang juga akomodatif. Dalam perjanjian pinjam-meminjam antarpelaku usaha, ada kalanya debitor tidak dapat membayarkan utangnya sehingga mengalami kepailitan. Hal ini membuat kepailitan lintas batas menjadi diskursus yang penting dalam mengimbangi dinamika dunia usaha saat ini. Dalam tulisan ini, ada beberapa hal terkait yang akan dibahas. Pertama, UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency memberi pedoman terkait hukum kepailitan lintas batas. Kedua, status quo hukum kepailitan Indonesia dalam mengatur kepailitan lintas batas. Ketiga, studi komparasi dengan Singapura sebagai negara yang hingga sebelum 2017 tidak menerapkan UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Keempat, urgensi UNCITRAL Model Law diimplementasikan dalam hukum kepailitan Indonesia. Tulisan ini dibuat berdasarkan penelitan yuridis-normatif dengan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder sebagai data sekunder yang menjadi dasar analisis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Trosborg, Anna. "Regulative Strategies in Arbitration Law Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (UNCITRAL) compared with Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China." HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business 17, no. 32 (March 7, 2017): 99. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v17i32.25758.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper is concerned with the laying down of the law in international and domestic arbitration. Interest centres on regulative and constitutive functions, and an analysis of realisation patterns of regulative (directive) acts is reported. The focus is on the linguistic realisation patterns of obligation, prohibition, and permission in terms of modal verbs and constitutive rules.The ﬁndings show that the language of the law characteristically select patterns of directives which are speciﬁc to the legal domain. Face redress typically used in everyday communication as well as business interaction is not a device used in arbitration law. Moreover, the linguistic devices employed differ as regards different parts of the law. Modal verbs are typically applied for action rules, whereas constitutive rules are mainly reserved for stipulation rules and deﬁnition rules.The analysis offers a comparison of Unicitral Model Law and domestic law. Finally, attention is paid to the adequacy of the chosen linguistic realisation patterns as regards simpliﬁcation/ easiﬁ cation of legal expressions. The results are compared to those obtained in a previous study of Contract Law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Kalisz, Beata Gessel Kalinowska Vel. "Admissibility of Electronic Awards in the UNCITRAL Model Law Jurisdiction: Polish Law Example." Journal of International Arbitration 38, Issue 2 (April 1, 2021): 147–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2021009.

Full text

Abstract:

The author examines whether an award signed electronically can be deemed to constitute an award in writing as provided for in Article 31 of the UNCITRAL Model Law, which is reflected verbatim in article 1197 of the Polish Civil Code. The conclusion is that an electronic signature as such is functionally equivalent to the written signature. Having said that, not all types of electronic signature can be admitted in this respect. The eIDAS Regulation (Regulation 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on electronic identification and trust services) provides for three types of electronic signature: regular, advanced, and qualified, stating that the qualified signature should be deemed as equivalent to the written signature. The author is of the opinion that both the advanced and qualified electronic signatures fulfil the requirements of the form ‘in writing’, ensuring the safeguards as listed in article 26 of the Regulation. Specifically: it is uniquely linked to the signatory; it is capable of identifying the signatory; it is created using electronic signature creation data that the signatory can, with a high level of confidence, use under his sole control; and it is linked to the data signed therewith in such a way that any subsequent change in the data is detectable. arbitration, form of acts in law, arbitration award, electronic form, UNCITRAL model law, electronic signature, eIDAS Regulation

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Fauji, Asep Ahmad. "PENERAPAN PRINSIP UNCITRAL MODEL LAW DALAM PEMBUKTIAN KASUS TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA." University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 2, no. 1 (April 22, 2017): 90–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.2.1.90-102.

Full text

Abstract:

Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi tidak lagi dapat dilakukan melalui sistem hukum konvensional, mengingat kegiatannya tidak lagi bisa dibatasi oleh teritorial suatu Negara. Persoalan yang lebih luas juga terjadi untuk masalah-masalah keperdataan, karena saat ini transaksi e-commerce telah menjadi bagian dari perniagaan nasional dan internasional. Pelanggaran hukum dengan instrumen teknologi informasi seringkali sulit dipecahkan. Tulisan ini akan membahas terkait dengan perapan prinsip UNCITRAL Model Law dalam pembuktian kasus transaksi elektronik di Indonesia dan persyaratan hukum terhadap data elektronik sebagai bentuk pembuktian kasus transaksi elektronik di Indonesia. Kesimpulan yang didapatkan yakni Indonesia telah menerapkan prinsip UNCITRAL Model Law dalam Pembuktian Kasus Transaksi Elektronik dengan pendekatan yang secara fugsinya sama dan pendekatan kenetralan suatu teknologi. Penyelesaian kasus e-commerce di Indonesia harus memenuhi persyaratan hukum terhadap data elektronik sebagai bentuk pembuktian kasus transaksi elektronik dengan mengandung unsur tertulis, syarat adanya tanda tangan, dan juga keaslian.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Fauji, Asep Ahmad. "PENERAPAN PRINSIP UNCITRAL MODEL LAW DALAM PEMBUKTIAN KASUS TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA." University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 2, no. 1 (April 22, 2017): 90–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.v2i1.8013.

Full text

Abstract:

Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi tidak lagi dapat dilakukan melalui sistem hukum konvensional, mengingat kegiatannya tidak lagi bisa dibatasi oleh teritorial suatu Negara. Persoalan yang lebih luas juga terjadi untuk masalah-masalah keperdataan, karena saat ini transaksi e-commerce telah menjadi bagian dari perniagaan nasional dan internasional. Pelanggaran hukum dengan instrumen teknologi informasi seringkali sulit dipecahkan. Tulisan ini akan membahas terkait dengan perapan prinsip UNCITRAL Model Law dalam pembuktian kasus transaksi elektronik di Indonesia dan persyaratan hukum terhadap data elektronik sebagai bentuk pembuktian kasus transaksi elektronik di Indonesia. Kesimpulan yang didapatkan yakni Indonesia telah menerapkan prinsip UNCITRAL Model Law dalam Pembuktian Kasus Transaksi Elektronik dengan pendekatan yang secara fugsinya sama dan pendekatan kenetralan suatu teknologi. Penyelesaian kasus e-commerce di Indonesia harus memenuhi persyaratan hukum terhadap data elektronik sebagai bentuk pembuktian kasus transaksi elektronik dengan mengandung unsur tertulis, syarat adanya tanda tangan, dan juga keaslian.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

De la Harpe, S. "Procurement under the Uncitral model law: a southern Africa perspective." Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 18, no. 5 (February 19, 2016): 1571. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i5.11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Herrmann, G. "The UNCITRAL Model Law - its background, salient features and purposes." Arbitration International 1, no. 1 (April 1, 1985): 6–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/1.1.6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Frade, Celina. "Generic variation across legislative writing. A contrastive analysis of the UNCITRAL Model Law and Brazil's Arbitration Law." HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business 17, no. 32 (March 7, 2017): 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v17i32.25756.

Full text

Abstract:

The nature of legislation is to control human relations and actions by words. Legislative writing displays relative uniformity though, as a genre, some variations are allowed across legal systems, as in the case of arbitration laws. This article focuses on the generic variation of two arbitration laws: the UNCITRAL Model Law on the International Commercial Arbitration (hereafter UNCITRAL) and the Brazilian Arbitration Law 9.307/1996 (hereafter BAL). Arbitration is an alternative form of conﬂ ict resolution based upon the free will of the parties to invest arbitrators, (not the judiciary) with the jurisdiction to settle disputes in a contract of commercial nature. The claim is that the analysis (at surface level) of textual organization and legislative style in the data cannot account alone for an explanation of how legislative information is functionally realized in order to achieve its communicative intent. To explain this we, therefore, also consider how legislative information is packaged by means of some textualization devices (qualiﬁ cational insertions, binomial and multinomial structures and textual-mapping) and conclude by showing how recontextualization is realized in the data by means of generality, fuzziness and vagueness of terms and expressions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Gautama, S. "Hukum Manakah yang Dipakai untuk Arbitrase Dagang Internasional." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 19, no. 4 (June 13, 2017): 329. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol19.no4.1151.

Full text

Abstract:

Sudah umum diakui bahwa pilihan hukum oleh para pihak merupakan sesuatu yang menentukan dalam perjanjian internasional. Prinsip itu terdapat pada pasal 33 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, dan juga dalam Model Law UNCITRAL padal 28 ayat 1. Dalam hukum positif Indonesia pun prinsip tersebut telah diadaptasi melalui Undang-Undang No.5 Tahun 1968. Kiranya, prinsip diata sjuga perlu diintrodusir didalam Rancangan Undang-undang UPI Indonesia nasional yang sedang dipersiapkan.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Gharavi, H. G. "The 1997 Iranian International Commercial Arbitration Law: The UNCITRAL Model Law a L'Iranienne." Arbitration International 15, no. 1 (March 1, 1999): 85–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/15.1.85.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Han, Ping. "Challenging arbitral awards: A comparative study of Chinese law, british law and UNCITRAL model law." Frontiers of Law in China 6, no. 3 (August 19, 2011): 418–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11463-011-0137-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Reilly, Louise. "Harmonisation of Irish Arbitration Law: Arbitration Act 2010." Journal of International Arbitration 28, Issue 2 (April 1, 2011): 163–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2011014.

Full text

Abstract:

On June 8, 2010, a new Arbitration Act came into force in the Republic of Ireland which abolished the distinction between domestic and international arbitration and incorporated the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration as the grounding piece of legislation for all arbitrations conducted in Ireland.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Seppälä, Christopher R. "Why Finland Should Adopt the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration." Journal of International Arbitration 34, Issue 4 (August 1, 2017): 585–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2017028.

Full text

Abstract:

This article describes why a small country like Finland, which has excellent natural attributes as a place for arbitration (political neutrality and stability, respect for the rule of law, freedom from corruption and a central location between East and West), but which is little resorted to for this purpose, being overshadowed by its neighbour, Sweden, should adopt the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (‘UNCITRAL’) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (the ‘Model Law’). The indispensable condition for any country to develop as a place for arbitration is for it to have a modern and internationally acceptable arbitration law. However, Finland’s arbitration law is relatively old (dating from 1992) and based on an antiquated Swedish model. What is more serious is that Finland’s legal infrastructure for arbitration, that is, its arbitration law and court system, is not perceived by international arbitration users and arbitral institutions as being internationally acceptable. By contrast, the Model Law is recognized today as the ‘baseline for any state wishing to modernize its law of arbitration’ Accordingly, if Finland wants to become an attractive place for international arbitration, as it should do, the obvious solution is for it to adopt the Model Law. This will make Finland instantly recognizable around the world as having a modern and internationally acceptable arbitration law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!