Academic literature on the topic 'Unconscionable conduct'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Unconscionable conduct.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Unconscionable conduct"
Zumbo, Frank. "Australia Prohibits Unconscionable Commercial Conduct." Business Law Review 20, Issue 3 (March 1, 1999): 66–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bula1999019.
Full textChan, Sean. "Future-Proof Doctrine or Relic of an Equitable Past? Unconscionable Conduct in the Fair Trading Amendment Act 2021." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 53, no. 2 (August 29, 2022): 185–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v53i2.7708.
Full textMilne, Patrick. "Proprietary Estoppel and the Element of Unconscionable Conduct." Cambridge Law Journal 56, no. 1 (March 1997): 34–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300017669.
Full textFinlay, Anne. "Unconscionable Conduct and the Business Plaintiff: Has Australia Gone Too Far?" Anglo-American Law Review 28, no. 4 (October 1999): 470–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147377959902800405.
Full textMuchlinski, Peter. "‘Caveat Investor’? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55, no. 3 (July 2006): 527–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei104.
Full textSpears, Charlotte. "Consumer Protection: Online Sale of Prescription Drugs to Minors Not Unconscionable." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30, no. 2 (2002): 315–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1073110500008561.
Full textEldridge, John. "LAWFUL-ACT DURESS AND MARITAL AGREEMENTS." Cambridge Law Journal 77, no. 1 (March 2018): 32–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197318000211.
Full textPaterson, Jeannie Marie, and Gerard Brody. "“Safety Net” Consumer Protection: Using Prohibitions on Unfair and Unconscionable Conduct to Respond to Predatory Business Models." Journal of Consumer Policy 38, no. 3 (November 9, 2014): 331–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9276-y.
Full textHalliwell, Margaret. "Estoppel: unconscionability as a cause of action." Legal Studies 14, no. 1 (March 1994): 15–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.1994.tb00563.x.
Full textLatimer, Paul. "It's Time for Federal Regulation of Retirement Villages." Federal Law Review 45, no. 3 (September 2017): 469–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.22145/flr.45.3.5.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Unconscionable conduct"
Rheeders, Anjo. "The international interpretation of unconscionable conduct and the unconscionability factors contained in section 40 of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53182.
Full textMini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2015.
Mercantile Law
LLM
Unrestricted
Buchan, Jennifer Mary. "Franchisor failure : an assessment of the adequacy of regulatory response." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2010. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/39027/1/Jennifer_Buchan_Thesis.pdf.
Full textBooks on the topic "Unconscionable conduct"
T, Vout Paul, ed. Unconscionable conduct: The laws of Australia. 2nd ed. Pyrmont, N.S.W: Thomson Reuters, 2009.
Find full textUnconscionable conduct: The laws of Australia. 2nd ed. Pyrmont, N.S.W: Thomson Reuters, 2009.
Find full textBen, McFarlane. The Law of Proprietary Estoppel. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198814870.001.0001.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Unconscionable conduct"
"Unconscionable conduct." In Australian Commercial Law, 444–67. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108629003.021.
Full textHO, Lusina. "Reprehensible Conduct: Threats and Unfair Exploitation in Hong Kong." In Invalidity, 87–104. Oxford University PressOxford, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192859341.003.0005.
Full textBeatson, Jack, Andrew Burrows, and John Cartwright. "10. Duress, Undue Influence, and Unconscionable Bargains." In Anson's Law of Contract, 371–404. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198829973.003.0010.
Full textDavies, Paul S., and Graham Virgo. "7. Constructive Trusts." In Equity & Trusts, 325–60. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198821830.003.0007.
Full textPearce, Robert, and Warren Barr. "9. Constructive trusts." In Pearce & Stevens' Trusts and Equitable Obligations. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198745495.003.0009.
Full textBarr, Warren, and John Picton. "10. Constructive trusts." In Pearce & Stevens' Trusts and Equitable Obligations, 238–64. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198867494.003.0010.
Full textBen, McFarlane. "5 Unconscionability." In The Law of Proprietary Estoppel. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198814870.003.0005.
Full textVirgo, Graham. "9. Constructive Trusts." In The Principles of Equity & Trusts, 271–98. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198854159.003.0009.
Full textVirgo, Graham. "9. Constructive trusts." In The Principles of Equity & Trusts. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804710.003.0009.
Full text"meeting was to discuss an issue different to A’s intended motive, namely, to secure the transfer of an option which B enjoyed over commercial property assigned to A. In the course of this meeting, A gave the impression that he was looking to expand the business run from those premises, when, in fact, he wished to close the business down, provided he was able to secure the transfer of B’s option to himself. As a result of the meeting, B transferred the option to A, but later sought rectification of the written document when A’s real motives were discovered. At first instance, it was held that, since A did not have actual knowledge of B’s mistake, rectification was not possible. However, the Court of Appeal reversed this ruling on the ground that the contract should be performed in accordance with B’s understanding as to what had been agreed. Accordingly, the contract was rectified in the light of A’s unconscionable conduct. In Bates (Thomas) & Son Ltd v Wyndham’s (Lingerie) Ltd, the tenants of premises leased from the plaintiffs, on previous occasions, had contracted for an option to renew the lease at a rental to be fixed by arbitration, in the event of a dispute. The new lease which the parties had entered into did not contain any provision for arbitration. The tenants were aware of the omission, but did not draw the fact to the attention of the plaintiffs. In the event, the court declined to order rectification because there was a chance of some inequitable benefit to the person who was aware of the plaintiff’s mistake: Bates (Thomas) & Son Ltd v Wyndham’s (Lingerie) Ltd [1981] 1 All ER 1077, CA, p 1085." In Sourcebook on Contract Law, 334–35. Routledge-Cavendish, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843141518-131.
Full text