Academic literature on the topic 'Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR)'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR)"

1

Kennedy, J. A., E. Burn, H. R. Mohammad, S. J. Mellon, A. Judge, and D. W. Murray. "Lifetime revision risk for medial unicompartmental knee replacement is lower than expected." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 28, no. 12 (2020): 3935–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05863-3.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Purpose Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is widely considered to be a pre-total knee replacement (TKR) particularly in the young. The implication of this is that it is sensible to do a UKR, even though it will be revised at some stage, as it will delay the need for a TKR. The chance of a UKR being revised during a patient’s life time has not previously been calculated. The aim of this study was to estimate this lifetime revision risks for patients of different ages undergoing UKR. Methods Calculations were based on data from a designer series of 1000 medial Oxford UKR with mean
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Yu, Hiu-Kiu, Bruce Yan-Ho Tang, Hok-Leung Wong, Sumire Sasaki, and Tai-Fong Wong. "Better immediate and early postoperative outcomes of unicompartmental knee replacement comparing with total knee replacement: A matched cohort of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis." Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation 28 (January 2021): 221049172110569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/22104917211056951.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction: This study compared the immediate and early postoperative outcomes of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis patients receiving unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) with a matched cohort of total knee replacement (TKR). Methods: 26 UKR patients were matched with 26 TKR patients based on age, body mass index, pre-operative radiographic severity, range of motion (ROM), Knee Society score (KSS) and Feller patella score. Immediate postoperative outcomes were reflected by postoperative pain, blood loss, length of stay and the number of physiotherapy sessions attended. Early postope
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ventura, Alberto, Claudio Legnani, Clara Terzaghi, Vittorio Macchi, and Enrico Borgo. "Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Combined to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Results." Journal of Knee Surgery 33, no. 11 (2019): 1152–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692647.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractA study was conducted to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of combined medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The hypothesis was that this procedure would lead to satisfying results in patients affected by medial osteoarthritis and ACL insufficiency. Fourteen patients with ACL deficiency and concomitant medial compartment symptomatic osteoarthritis were treated from 2006 to 2010. Twelve of them were followed-up for an average time of 7.8 year (range: 6–10 years). Assessment included Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hariri, Mustafa, Merlin Hagemann, Paul Mick, et al. "Physical Activity of Young Patients Following Minimally Invasive Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Replacement." Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 2 (2023): 635. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020635.

Full text
Abstract:
Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has increased in popularity in recent years, especially in young patients with high demands on their athletic ability. To date, there are no data available on the physical activity of young patients following lateral UKR. The aim of this study was to demonstrate return-to-activity rate and sporting activity of patients aged 60 years or younger following lateral UKR with a fixed-bearing (FB) prosthesis. Thirty-seven patients aged 60 years or younger after lateral FB-UKR were included. Sporting activities were assessed using the University of California Lo
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Rajani, Amyn M., Kareena Rajani, Urvil A. Shah, Anmol RS Mittal, Rahul Sheth, and Meenakshi Punamiya. "Pseudoaneurysm of the Lateral Genicular Artery Following Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty: A Rare Case Report." Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 12, no. 8 (2022): 57–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i08.2964.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction: Unicondylar knee replacement is a minimally invasive technique of surface replacement of the knee joint. Very little literature is available regarding vascular complications in patients who undergo this procedure due to their extremely rare nature. Case Report: This first-of-its-kind report describes a case of pseudoaneurysm of the lateral genicular artery of the right knee in a hypertensive, 65-year-old man, following a single sitting bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). With no involvement of the lateral compartment in UKR, we suspect an underlying mechanical elem
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Panzram, Benjamin, Mira Mandery, Tobias Reiner, Tobias Gotterbarm, Marcus Schiltenwolf, and Christian Merle. "Cementless Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement—Clinical and Radiological Results of 228 Knees with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up." Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 5 (2020): 1476. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051476.

Full text
Abstract:
(1) Background: Studies show several advantages of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) over total knee replacements (TKR), whereas registry based revision rates of UKR are significantly higher than for TKA. Registry data report lower revision rates for cementless UKR compared to cemented UKR. The aim of this study was to assess clinical and radiological results of cementless Oxford UKR (OUKR) in an independent cohort. (2) Methods: This retrospective cohort study examines a consecutive series of 228 cementless OUKR. Clinical outcome was measured using functional scores (Oxford Knee Score (O
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Daly, D., and R. Maxwell. "TEN YEARS OF COMBINED ACL RECONSTRUCTION AND UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTIES." Orthopaedic Proceedings 105-B, SUPP_2 (2023): 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2023.2.060.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to assess the long term results of combined ACL reconstruction and unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR). These patients have been selected for this combined operation due to their combination of instability symptoms from an absent ACL and unicompartmental arthritis.Retrospective review of 44 combined UKR and ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon. Surgeries included both medial and lateral UKR combined with either revision ACL reconstruction or primary ACL reconstruction. Patient reported outcomes were obtained preoperatively, at one year, 5 years and 10 years.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Tang, Bruce Yan Ho, Chi Nok Cheung, Hon For Tsui, and Hok Leung Wong. "Early promising result of bicompartmental knee replacement in middle-aged patients." Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation 26, no. 2 (2019): 85–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2210491719848758.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction: Partial knee replacement (PKR) is one of the treatment options in middle-aged patients with less extensive knee osteoarthritis, with unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) most commonly done for medial osteoarthritis. There are numerous advantages like bone/ligament preserving and faster recovery. However, the indications of UKR remain controversial, as most patients have some patellofemoral joint (PFJ) osteoarthritis. We performed modular bicruciate-retaining bicompartmental knee replacement (BKR) in this group of patients and compared the outcome with total knee replacement (T
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Spinelli, M., S. Affatato, M. K. Harman, and J. D. DesJardins. "Bi-unicondylar knee prosthesis functional assessment utilizing force-control wear testing." Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 224, no. 7 (2009): 813–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1243/09544119jeim726.

Full text
Abstract:
Recent in vivo studies have identified variations in knee prosthesis function depending on prosthesis geometry, kinematic conditions, and the absence/presence of soft-tissue constraints after knee replacement surgery. In particular, unicondylar knee replacements (UKR) are highly sensitive to such variations. However, rigorous descriptions of UKR function through experimental simulation studies, performed under physiological force-controlled conditions, are lacking. The current study evaluated the long-term functional performance of a widely used fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement,
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Mowbray, J., C. Frampton, R. Maxwell, and G. Hooper. "SIXTEEN-YEAR SURVIVAL AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF THE CEMENTLESS OXFORD UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT." Orthopaedic Proceedings 105-B, SUPP_2 (2023): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2023.2.095.

Full text
Abstract:
Cementless fixation is an alternative to cemented unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), with several advantages over cementation. This study reports on the 15-year survival and 10-year clinical outcomes of the cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (OUKR).This prospective study describes the clinical outcomes and survival of first 693 consecutive cementless medial OUKRs implanted in New Zealand.The sixteen-year survival was 89.2%, with forty-six knees being revised. The commonest reason for revision was progression of arthritis, which occurred in twenty-three knees, followed by
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!