Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Contents

Journal articles
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 28 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research"

1

Iltis, Ana S. "Justice, Fairness, and Membership in a Class: Conceptual Confusions and Moral Puzzles in the Regulation of Human Subjects Research." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39, no. 3 (2011): 488–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00616.x.

Full text

Abstract:

Much of the human research conducted in the United States or by U.S. researchers is regulated by the Common Rule. The Common Rule reflects the decision of 17 federal agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services (whose regulations appear at 45CFR46), to require that investigators follow the same rules for conducting human research. (The Food and Drug Administration [FDA] has its own rules (at 21CFR50 and 21CFR56), though there is significant overlap with the Common Rule.) Many of the obligations delineated in the Common Rule can be traced back to the work of the National Comm

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Berlin, Ivan, and David A. Gorelick. "The French Law on “Protection of Persons Undergoing Biomedical Research”: Implications for the U.S." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31, no. 3 (2003): 434–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00106.x.

Full text

Abstract:

Because research involving human subjects exposes people to risk not always for their own potential benefit, the question arises as to how best ensure that: (1) research participants are protected and benefited according to the highest ethical standards, while, on the other hand, (2) researchers are protected and free to do research that will produce clinical advances for both research participants and society as a whole.The balancing of the risk to research participants versus the benefits derived from the research is performed in many counrries by a system for the protection of human researc

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Joffe, Steven. "Revolution or Reform in Human Subjects Research Oversight." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40, no. 4 (2012): 922–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00721.x.

Full text

Abstract:

Over the past 40 years, a complex review and oversight system has grown within the United States and internationally to regulate the conduct of human subjects research. This system developed in response to revelations of abuses of human subjects in experiments such as those conducted in the Nazi concentration camps, the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male, the Willowbrook Hepatitis Studies, and the studies described by Beecher in his 1966 article in the New England Journal of Medicine. The oversight system is based on a foundation, first implemented by the U.S. Public Health

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

FERDOWSIAN, HOPE, L. SYD M. JOHNSON, JANE JOHNSON, ANDREW FENTON, ADAM SHRIVER, and JOHN GLUCK. "A Belmont Report for Animals?" Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29, no. 1 (2019): 19–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180119000732.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract:Human and animal research both operate within established standards. In the United States, criticism of the human research environment and recorded abuses of human research subjects served as the impetus for the establishment of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, and the resulting Belmont Report. The Belmont Report established key ethical principles to which human research should adhere: respect for autonomy, obligations to beneficence and justice, and special protections for vulnerable individuals and populations. While

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Casanova Moreno, Maria de la Caridad, Francisco Machado Reyes, Wagner González Casanova, Daimy Casanova Moreno, and Diana Belkis Gómez Guerra. "Tuskegee experiment, bioethical violation as present and future in the development of human society." Seminars in Medical Writing and Education 3 (December 30, 2024): 612. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024612.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction. The Tuskegee Experiment was a clinical study between 1932 and 1972 in the American city of Tuskegee, by the United States Public Health Service. Objective. Describe the history of the Tuskegee experiment, as a violation of bioethics for the present and future in the development of human society. Material and method. A retrospective historical study was carried out where theoretical methods such as documentary and historical-logical analysis were used. Development. Six hundred African-American sharecroppers, mostly illiterate who did not give informed consent, were studied to obse

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Jacobs, Frederic, and Arina Zonnenberg. "Tangible and intangible costs of "protecting human subjects": The impact of the National Research Act of 1974 onuniversity research activities." education policy analysis archives 12 (November 24, 2004): 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n65.2004.

Full text

Abstract:

This article (1) examines the overall structure of regulatory research oversight in the United States; (2) details the origins and evolution of federal legislation pertaining to the protection of human subjects in biomedical and behavioral treatment and research; and (3) describes the expansion of oversight regulation from biomedical and behavioral treatment areas to the social sciences. In addition, the paper describes three areas identified by compliance administrators as susceptible to abuse: (1) informed consent, (2) assessment of risks and benefits, and (3) equitable selection of human su

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Morris, Marilyn C. "Pediatric Participation in Non-Therapeutic Research." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40, no. 3 (2012): 665–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00697.x.

Full text

Abstract:

Pediatric participation in non-therapeutic research that poses greater than minimal risk has been the subject of considerable thought-provoking debate in the research ethics literature. While the need for more pediatric research has been called morally imperative, and concerted efforts have been made to increase pediatric medical research, the importance of protecting children from undue research risks remains paramount.United States research regulations are derived largely from the deliberations and report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behav

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Serpico, Kimberley. "The Belmont Report doesn’t need reform, our moral imagination does." Research Ethics, March 4, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470161241235772.

Full text

Abstract:

In 1974, the United States Congress asked a question prompting a national conversation about ethics: which ethical principles should govern research involving human participants? To embark on an answer, Congress passed the National Research Act, and charged this task to the newly established National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Commission’s mandate was modest however, the results were anything but. The outcome was The Belmont Report: a trio of principles - respect for persons, beneficence, and justice - serving as an ethical compas

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Bowers, Olivia, and Mifrah Hayath. "Cultural Relativity and Acceptance of Embryonic Stem Cell Research." Voices in Bioethics 10 (May 16, 2024). http://dx.doi.org/10.52214/vib.v10i.12685.

Full text

Abstract:

Photo ID 158378414 © Eduard Muzhevskyi | Dreamstime.com ABSTRACT There is a debate about the ethical implications of using human embryos in stem cell research, which can be influenced by cultural, moral, and social values. This paper argues for an adaptable framework to accommodate diverse cultural and religious perspectives. By using an adaptive ethics model, research protections can reflect various populations and foster growth in stem cell research possibilities. INTRODUCTION Stem cell research combines biology, medicine, and technology, promising to alter health care and the understanding

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Pirzada, Nefes. "The Ethical Dilemma of Non-Human Primate Use in Biomedical Research." Voices in Bioethics 8 (February 27, 2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.52214/vib.v8i.9348.

Full text

Abstract:

Photo by Ricky Kharawala on Unsplash INTRODUCTION When people think of biomedical research, they often envision rats kept in cages with scientists in white coats and blue gloves checking on them, taking notes, and injecting them with substances. The images make some people uncomfortable, evoking a twinge of guilt as they think of the rats suffering. However, the idea that the sacrifice of a few mice saves thousands of human lives may outweigh their guilty conscience. Based on arguments for and against non-human primate (NHP) use in research, this paper concludes that NHP use is scientifically

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research"

1

Velasco, Juan María de. La bioética y el principio de solidaridad: Una perspectiva desde la ética teológica. Universidad de Deusto, 2003.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research"

1

Beauchamp, Tom L. "The Belmont Report." In The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195168655.003.0015.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The Belmont Report is a short document on moral principles that was published in 1978 by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (National Commission). Since that time it has provided a basic framework for analyzing ethical issues that arise during medical research in the United States and in many other countries.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Annas, George J. "The Politics of Fetal Tissue Transplants." In Standard Of Care. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195072471.003.0014.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Research involving human fetal tissue has been the subject of intense political debate in the United States for two decades, and the use of fetal tissue for transplant continues this controversy in another forum. ‘ Since Roe v. Wade, the federal government has focused public attention on fetal re search by creating panels of experts. For example, in 1974 Congress created the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research and put the formulation of regulations on fetal research first on its agenda. The resulting regulations were reason ab

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Annas, George J. "The Nuremberg Code in U.S. Courts: Ethics versus Expediency." In The Nazi Doctors And The Nuremberg Code. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195070422.003.0012.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract “The most complete and authoritative statement of the law of informed consent to human experimentation is the Nuremberg Code.”1 That was the conclusion Leonard Glantz, Barbara Katz, and I reached 15 years ago in our study of informed consent to human experimentation for the National Commission for the Protection of Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. We went on to say, “This Code is part of international common law and may be applied in both civil and criminal cases, by state, federal and municipal courts in the United States.”2 I still believe these two statements are tru

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!