Academic literature on the topic 'Validity research'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Validity research.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Validity research"
Bashir, Josefeena, and Marudhar Marudhar. "Reliability & Validity of the Research." Scientific Journal of India 3, no. 1 (December 31, 2018): 66–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.21276/24565644/2018.v3.i1.23.
Full textSudman, Seymour, William A. Belson, Jean M. Converse, and Stanley Presser. "Validity in Survey Research." Contemporary Sociology 17, no. 2 (March 1988): 256. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2070641.
Full textPhillips, Denis C. "Validity in Qualitative Research." Education and Urban Society 20, no. 1 (November 1987): 9–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124587020001003.
Full textHills, Mary G., and W. A. Belson. "Validity in Survey Research." Applied Statistics 37, no. 1 (1988): 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2347500.
Full textBrink, Pamela J. "Validity in Field Research." Western Journal of Nursing Research 12, no. 3 (June 1990): 279–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019394599001200301.
Full textWhittemore, Robin, Susan K. Chase, and Carol Lynn Mandle. "Validity in Qualitative Research." Qualitative Health Research 11, no. 4 (July 2001): 522–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119299.
Full textMazalová, Lenka, and Jana Marečková. "TYPES OF VALIDITY IN NANDA INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH." Profese online 5, no. 2 (October 1, 2012): 11–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/pol.2012.011.
Full textRoberts, Paula, Helena Priest, and Michael Traynor. "Reliability and validity in research." Nursing Standard 20, no. 44 (July 12, 2006): 41–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2006.07.20.44.41.c6560.
Full textLynch, John G., David Brinberg, and Joseph E. McGrath. "Validity and the Research Process." Journal of Marketing Research 23, no. 4 (November 1986): 394. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151816.
Full textChen, Wei Jin, Huai Lin Dong, Qing Feng Wu, and Ling Lin. "Research on Fuzzy Clustering Validity." Applied Mechanics and Materials 40-41 (November 2010): 174–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.40-41.174.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Validity research"
Krogstad, Finn. "Evaluating the validity of research implications /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/5551.
Full textDadds, Marion. "Validity and award-bearing teacher action-research." Thesis, University of East Anglia, 1991. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.293229.
Full textGaede, Rolf Joachim. "Validity in image-based research : a Delphi study." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/16049.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The area of study is the notion of validity in image-based research, i.e. research approaches where visual images such as photographs or video recordings form an integral part of one or more of the methods used. In the literature investigation chapters of the study, (1) the notion of validity is reviewed with special reference to contributions by Cook and Campbell, Guba and Lincoln, Kvale, Lather and Morse; (2) the inherent properties of visual images are discussed from a semiotic perspective, and (3) following a discussion of reflexivity in image-based research, the various domains of image-based research practice are demarcated according to the unit of analysis, the data format, the researcher role (outsider, insider, participant) and the production of the visual material (ex ante or ex post with weak or strong researcher control). The literature investigation chapters were taken as the point of departure for the development of a conceptual framework for assessing validity in image-based research, the mechanics of which are illustrated with reference to selected aspects of image-based research projects by Lomax and Casey, Clark and Zimmer, Rich and Chalfen, DuFon and Chaplin. The conceptual framework was refined on the strength of a Delphi study. The Delphi procedure involved canvassing and pooling the opinions of experts in the field of image-based research about issues of validity with a view to ensure that the assumptions made during the development of the conceptual framework fit sufficiently with image-based research practice. Flowing from the literature investigation chapters as well as the Delphi procedure, the central thesis of the study is that the notion of validity is in the first instance contextdependent and that this is compounded in the case of image-based research by the relative instability of iconic codes and the strong drift towards 'unlimited' semiosis inherent in the visual communication process.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die studieveld behels ‘n ondersoek na die gedagte van geldigheid soos van toepassing op beeldgebaseerde navorsing, d.w.s. navorsingsbenaderings waar visuele beelde soos foto’s of video-opnames ‘n integrale deel uitmaak maak een of meer van die metodes wat gebruik word. In die hoofstukke wat die literatuurstudie uitmaak, word (1) die gedagte van geldigheid onder die loep geneem met spesifieke verwysing na die bydraes van Cook en Campbell, Guba en Lincoln, Kvale, Lather en Morse, (2) word die inherente eienskappe van visuele beelde vanaf 'n semiotiese oogpunt bespreek, en (3) word die verskeie velde van beeldgebaseerde navorsingspraktyk afgebaken volgens die eenheid van ontleding, die dataformaat, die rol van die navorser (buitestaander, binnestaander, deelnemer) en die produksie van die visuele materiaal (ex ante of ex post met sterk of swak navorserkontrole). Die hoofstukke wat gemoeid is met die literatuurstudie is as vertrekpunt geneem vir die daarstelling van ‘n konsepsuele raamwerk vir geldigheid aangaande beeldgebaseerde navorsing, en die werking hiervan is geïllustreer met verwysing na geselekteerde aspekte van beeldgebaseerde navorsing deur Lomax en Casey, Clark en Zimmer, Rich en Chalfen, DuFon end Chaplin. Hierdie konsepsuele raamwerk is verder verfyn op grond van ‘n Delphi-prosedure. Die Delphi-prosedure het behels dat die opinies van deskundiges in die veld van beeldgebaseerde navorsing aangaande kwessies van geldigheid ingewin en saamgevoeg is met die oog om te verseker dat die aannames wat gemaak is ten tyde van die ontwikkeling van die konsepsuele raamwerk genoegsaam gepas is vir die praktyk van beeldgebaseerde navorsing. Die tesis van die studie, gebaseer op die uitkomste van die literatuurstudie en die Delphi-prosedure, is dat die gedagte van geldigheid konteks-afhanklik is, wat in die geval van beeldgebaseerde navorsing vererger word deur die feit dat ikoniese kodes relatiefonstabiel is en dat die proses van visuele kommunikasie 'n sterk tendens na 'eindelose' semiosis toon.
Berjawi, Rania. "Evaluating Construct Validity Within Preclinical In Vivo Animal Research." Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/42159.
Full textJames, Megan. "The validity endeavour." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/4162.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: Qualitative and quantitative research implies different meta-theoretical approaches to knowledge production. The former maintains a constructivist and interpretative perspective, as opposed to the latter, which exists within a realist and even positivist paradigm. Within the field of research methodology, the dominant conceptualisation of validity is based on a positivist discourse, which suggests that (social) scientific research should strive to attain an ultimate truth. This understanding of validity is difficult to achieve within a research paradigm that values the idiosyncratic world views of the participants under investigation. The introduction of CAQDAS (Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software), however, brought with it the hope that its application would confer upon qualitative research the rigour associated with validity in a mainly positivist interpretation of the research process. The ultimate goal of this thesis is to determine whether CAQDAS can make a significant contribution to efforts aimed at validating qualitative research. The research design employed in the present study is that of a descriptive content analysis, focussing on scientific articles that not only report qualitative studies, but also make explicit reference to the use of CAQDAS, and describe validation techniques applied during the research process. Purposive sampling was applied to select 108 articles, published from 1996 to 2009, that meet the sampling criteria and that were identified through online searches of various bibliographic databases and search engines. The study investigates three predominant research questions concerned with the following: (1) the most commonly used software programmes; (2) trends in CAQDAS use over time; as well as (3) the validation techniques reported in examined scientific articles, distinguishing between techniques that are performed with and without the use of CAQDAS. With regard to the first two research questions, it was found that the three most commonly used software programmes are QSR N programmes (including NUD.IST, NVivo, N4, N5 and N6), followed by Atlas.ti and MAXqda (including the earlier version winMAX), and that there has been a general increase over iv the past 13 years (1996-2009) in the number of qualitative research articles reporting CAQDAS use. The exploration of validation techniques utilised in qualitative research, as reported in the examined scientific articles, demonstrated that the techniques are in most cases performed manually. Although CAQDAS offers many benefits, the predominant validation techniques reported can be, and still are, performed without CAQDAS. Techniques that would have been impossible without CAQDAS are based on the data display features of CAQDAS, as well as on the accuracy and consistency offered by CAQDAS in the execution of certain actions. The findings generated by this study seem to support the hypothesis that CAQDAS per se does not enhance validity, since it is predominantly utilised as merely a research tool.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Kwalitatiewe en kwantitatiewe navorsing is gegrond op verskillende meta-teoretiese benaderings tot die lewering van inligting. Eersgenoemde handhaaf ‘n konstruktivistiese en interpretatiewe perspektief, teenoor laasgenoemde, wat binne ‘n paradigma bestaan wat gegrond is op realisme en positivisme. Binne die veld van navorsingsmetodologie, is die oorwegende konseptualisering van geldigheid, gebaseer op ‘n positivistiese diskoers, wat voorstel dat (sosiale) wetenskaplike navorsing daarna moet streef om ‘n absolute waarheid te bereik. Hierdie begrip van geldigheid word moeilik verwesenlik binne ‘n navorsingsparadigma wat waarde heg aan die ideosinkratiese wêreldbeskouinge van die navorsingsdeelnemers. CAQDAS (Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software), is bekend gestel met die hoop dat die gebruik daarvan kwalitatiewe navorsing sal verleen met stiptheid wat met geldigheid geassosieer word, oorwegend binne ‘n positivistiese interpretasie van die navorsingsproses. Die oorkoepelende doelwit van hierdie tesis is om vas te stel of CAQDAS enige betekenisvolle bydrae kan maak tot pogings om die geldigheid van kwalitatiewe navorsing te verbeter. Die navorsingsontwerp van die huidige studie is die van ‘n beskrywende inhoudsanalise, wat fokus op wetenskaplike artikels wat nie net berig oor kwalitatiwe studies nie, maar ook verwys na die gebruik van CAQDAS, en die geldigheidstegnieke wat tydens die navorsingsproses toegepas is, bespreek. Doelgerigte steekproeftrekking is toegepas en 108 artikels, wat gepubliseer is vanaf 1996-2009, was geselekteer op grond van die feit dat hulle aan die seleksie kriteria voldoen. Die artikels was geïdentifiseer deur aanlyn soektogte van verskeie bibliografiese databasisse en soekenjins. Die studie ondersoek drie oorwegende navorsingsvrae met betrekking tot die volgende: (1) die sagteware programme wat die meeste gebruik word; (2) neigings in die gebruik van CAQDAS oor verloop van ‘n tydperk; sowel as (3) die geldigheidstegnieke wat in die ondersoekte wetenskaplike artikels vi gerapporteer word, deur onderskeid te tref tussen tegnieke wat met of sonder die gebruik van CAQDAS uitgevoer word. Met verwysing na die eerste twee navorsingsvrae, was dit gevind dat die drie algemeenste sagteware programme wat gebruik is, QSR N programme (insluitend NUD.IST, NVivo, N4, N5 en N6), gevolg deur Atlas.ti en MAXqda (insluitend die vroëere weergawe winMAX) is, en dat daar oor die algemeen ‘n toename is in die getal kwalitatiewe navorsingsartikels oor die afgelope 13 jaar (1996-2009), wat die gebruik van CAQDAS rapporteer. Die ondersoek na geldigheidstegnieke wat in kwalitatiewe navorsing gebruik word, soos berig in die ondersoekte wetenskaplike artikels, het getoon dat die tegnieke in die meeste gevalle sonder die gebruik van CAQDAS uitgevoer is. Ten spyte van die feit dat die gebruik van CAQDAS voordele inhou, word die meerderheid geldigheidstegnieke wat gerapporteeer word, steeds sonder die gebruik van CAQDAS uitgevoer. Tegnieke wat nie sonder die hulp van CAQDAS uitegevoer kon word nie, is gebaseer op die data vertoningsvermoë van CAQDAS, sowel as op die akkuraatheid en konsekwentheid waarmee CAQDAS sekere opdragte uitvoer. Die bevindinge wat gegenereer is deur hierdie studie blyk asof dit die hipotese ondersteun dat CAQDAS nie opsig self die geldigheid versterk nie, aangesien dit oorwegend bloot as ‘n navorsingsinstrument gebruik word.
Ramirez, Francisco Daniel. "Methodological Rigour in Preclinical Research: Implications for its Scientific Validity and Biomedical Progress." Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/39426.
Full textPerkins, Anne Witt. "Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI): A validity study." W&M ScholarWorks, 1991. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539618615.
Full textLiu, Yuanlong. "The statistical validity of using ratio variables in human kinetics research." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape10/PQDD_0019/NQ46373.pdf.
Full textHo, Ying-kit Edmond, and 何應傑. "Investigating the validity and reliability of international physical activity questionnaire (Chinese version)." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2003. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B31257380.
Full textKitchin, R. M. "Issues of validity and integrity in cognitive mapping research : investigating configurational knowledge." Thesis, Swansea University, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.637806.
Full textBooks on the topic "Validity research"
1927-, McGrath Joseph Edward, ed. Validity and the research process. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1985.
Find full textL, Miller Marc, ed. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1986.
Find full textJerome, Kirk. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1986.
Find full textDadds, Marion. Validity and award-bearing teacher action-research. Norwich: University of East Anglia, 1991.
Find full textGethmann, C. F., M. Carrier, G. Hanekamp, M. Kaiser, G. Kamp, S. Lingner, M. Quante, and F. Thiele. Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2.
Full textUebersax, John. Validity inferences from interobserver agreement. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1989.
Find full textLou, Casadevall-Keller Mary, ed. The tao of research: A path to validity. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2010.
Find full textRoussos, Louis A. LSAT item-type validity study. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 1998.
Find full textRoussos, Louis A. LSAT item-type validity study. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 1998.
Find full textChaudron, Craig. Reliability and validity in second language classroom research. [Honolulu, Hawaii]: University of Hawaii, 1988.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Validity research"
Patten, Mildred L., and Michelle Newhart. "Judgmental Validity." In Understanding Research Methods, 126–28. Tenth edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315213033-41.
Full textPatten, Mildred L., and Michelle Newhart. "Empirical Validity." In Understanding Research Methods, 129–32. Tenth edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315213033-42.
Full textFeighner, John P., and Jessica Herbstein. "Diagnostic Validity." In Issues in Diagnostic Research, 121–40. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1265-9_4.
Full textStaron, Miroslaw. "Validity Evaluation." In Action Research in Software Engineering, 169–89. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32610-4_10.
Full textHatala, Rose, and David A. Cook. "Reliability and Validity." In Healthcare Simulation Research, 191–97. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_26.
Full textPatten, Mildred L., and Michelle Newhart. "Introduction to Validity." In Understanding Research Methods, 123–25. Tenth edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315213033-40.
Full textPatten, Mildred L., and Michelle Newhart. "Judgmental-Empirical Validity." In Understanding Research Methods, 133–35. Tenth edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315213033-43.
Full textGass, Saul I., and Carl M. Harris. "Face validity." In Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, 279. New York, NY: Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-x_325.
Full textBoyle, Michael P., and Mike Schmierbach. "reliability and validity." In Applied Communication Research Methods, 122–50. Second edition. | New York: Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429296444-6.
Full textCohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. "Validity and reliability." In Research Methods in Education, 245–84. Eighth edition. | New York: Routledge, 2018.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539-14.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Validity research"
Wright, Hyrum K., Miryung Kim, and Dewayne E. Perry. "Validity concerns in software engineering research." In the FSE/SDP workshop. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1882362.1882446.
Full textLindell, Rebecca, and Lin Ding. "Establishing reliability and validity: An ongoing process." In 2012 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE. AIP, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4789643.
Full textOmasits, Christopher J. "Investigating the Validity of the MPEX Survey." In 2005 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE. AIP, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2177044.
Full textGren, Lucas. "Standards of validity and the validity of standards in behavioral software engineering research." In ESEM '18: ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3239235.3267437.
Full textMeng, Qiang, Xinyu Geng, Li Yang, Jie Tang, and Linlin Dong. "Validity Strategy Research Based on Theme Search." In 2011 International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences (ICCIS). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccis.2011.310.
Full textPuspita, Suri, and Yuni Ahda. "Validity of Research Based Bioremediation Text Books." In International Conference on Biology, Sciences and Education (ICoBioSE 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.200807.027.
Full textEbrahimy, Yasser, and Sima Rokni. "Validity of Industry Benchmarks and Metrics for Engineering Productivity." In Construction Research Congress 2010. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41109(373)106.
Full textWalsh, Cole, Katherine N. Quinn, and Natasha G. Holmes. "Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs: concurrent validity." In 2018 Physics Education Research Conference. American Association of Physics Teachers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/perc.2018.pr.walsh.
Full textYi, Wei-guo, Ming-yu Lu, and Zhi Liu. "Research on Time-Validity and Incremental Association Rules." In 2009 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering (ICISE 2009). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icise.2009.1019.
Full textWang, Ying, Guohua Liu, Zhen Huang, Jihui Li, Danfeng Zhao, and Fang Zhang. "The research on validity of artifact in BPM." In 2011 International Conference on Business Management and Electronic Information (BMEI). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icbmei.2011.5918029.
Full textReports on the topic "Validity research"
Golbeck, Amanda L. Evaluating statistical validity of research reports: a guide for managers, planners, and researchers. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/psw-gtr-87.
Full textHanushek, Eric, and Ludger Woessmann. Sample Selectivity and the Validity of International Student Achievement Tests in Economic Research. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w15867.
Full textKuge, Nobuyuki, Dario Salvucci, and Tomohiro Yamamura. Research on a Lange Change Intent Inference Based on Driver Model With Cognitive Scientific Validity. Warrendale, PA: SAE International, September 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2005-08-0570.
Full textPunjabi, Maitri, Julianne Norman, Lauren Edwards, and Peter Muyingo. Using ACASI to Measure Gender-Based Violence in Ugandan Primary Schools. RTI Press, March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2021.rb.0025.2104.
Full textRoschelle, Jeremy, Britte Haugan Cheng, Nicola Hodkowski, Lina Haldar, and Julie Neisler. Transfer for Future Learning of Fractions within Cignition’s Microtutoring Approach. Digital Promise, April 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/95.
Full textGlass, R. J., and V. C. Tidwell. Research program to develop and validate conceptual models for flow and transport through unsaturated, fractured rock; Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/138268.
Full textRolufs, Angela, Amelia Trout, Kevin Palmer, Clark Boriack, Bryan Brilhart, and Annette Stumpf. Integration of autonomous electric transport vehicles into a tactical microgrid : final report. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/42007.
Full textGarcía-Espinosa, J., and C. Soriano. Data management plan. Scipedia, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.23967/prodphd.2021.9.003.
Full textLatané, Annah, Jean-Michel Voisard, and Alice Olive Brower. Senegal Farmer Networks Respond to COVID-19. RTI Press, June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2021.rr.0045.2106.
Full text