Academic literature on the topic 'Visual perception. Optical illusions'

Cette thèse présente des modèles mathématiques pour la perception visuelle et s'occupe des phénomènes où on reconnait une brèche entre ce qui est représenté et ce qui est perçu. La complétion amodale consiste en percevoir un complètement d'un object qui est partiellement occlus, en opposition avec la complétion modale, dans laquelle on perçoit un object même si ses contours ne sont pas présents dans l'image [Gestalt, 99]. Ces contours, appelés illusoires, sont reconstruits par notre système visuelle et ils sont traités par les cortex visuels primaires (V1/V2) [93]. Des modèles géométriques de l'architecture fonctionnelle de V1 on le retrouve dans le travail de Hoffman [86]. Dans [139] Petitot propose un modèle pour le complètement de contours, équivalent neurale du modèle proposé par Mumford [125]. Dans cet environnement Citti et Sarti introduisent un modèle basé sur l'architecture fonctionnelle de la cortex visuel [28], qui justifie les illusions à un niveau neurale et envisage un modèle neuro-géometrique pour V1. Une autre classe sont les illusions d'optique géométriques (GOI), découvertes dans le XIX siècle [83, 190], qui apparaissent en présence d'une incompatibilité entre ce qui est présent dans l'espace object et le percept. L'idée fondamentale développée ici est que les GOIs se produisent suite à une polarisation de la connectivité de V1/V2, responsable de l'illusion. A partir de [28], où la connectivité qui construit les contours en V1 est modelée avec une métrique sub-Riemannian, on étend cela en disant que pour le GOIs la réponse corticale du stimule initial module la connectivité, en devenant un coefficient pour la métrique. GOIs seront testés avec ce modèle<br>This thesis presents mathematical models for visual perception and deals with such phenomena in which there is a visible gap between what is represented and what we perceive. A phenomenon which drew the interest most is amodal completion, consisting in perceiving a completion of a partially occluded object, in contrast with the modal completion, where we perceive an object even though its boundaries are not present [Gestalt theory, 99]. Such boundaries reconstructed by our visual system are called illusory contours, and their neural processing is performed by the primary visual cortices (V1/V2), [93]. Geometric models of the functional architecture of primary visual areas date back to Hoffman [86]. In [139] Petitot proposed a model of single boundaries completion through constraint minimization, neural counterpart of the model of Mumford [125]. In this setting Citti and Sarti introduced a cortical based model [28], which justifies the illusions at a neural level and provides a neurogeometrical model for V1. Another class of phenomena are Geometric optical illusions (GOIs), discovered in the XIX century [83, 190], arising in presence of a mismatch of geometrical properties between an item in object space and its associated percept. The fundamental idea developed here is these phenomena arise due to a polarization of the connectivity of V1/V2, responsible for the misperception. Starting from [28] in which the connectivity building contours in V1 is modeled as a sub-Riemannian metric, we extend it claiming that in GOIs the cortical response to the stimulus modulates the connectivity of the cortex, becoming a coefficient for the metric. GOIs will be tested through this model

Background. Tripping is a common factor in falls and a typical safety strategy to avoid tripping on steps or stairs is to increase foot clearance over the step edge. In the present study we asked whether the perceived height of a step could be increased using a visual illusion and whether this would lead to the adoption of a safer stepping strategy, in terms of greater foot clearance over the step edge. The study also addressed the controversial question of whether motor actions are dissociated from visual perception. Methodology/Principal Findings. 21 young, healthy subjects perceived the step to be higher in a configuration of the horizontal-vertical illusion compared to a reverse configuration (p = 0.01). During a simple stepping task, maximum toe elevation changed by an amount corresponding to the size of the visual illusion (p<0.001). Linear regression analyses showed highly significant associations between perceived step height and maximum toe elevation for all conditions. Conclusions/Significance. The perceived height of a step can be manipulated using a simple visual illusion, leading to the adoption of a safer stepping strategy in terms of greater foot clearance over a step edge. In addition, the strong link found between perception of a visual illusion and visuomotor action provides additional support to the view that the original, controversial proposal by Goodale and Milner (1992) of two separate and distinct visual streams for perception and visuomotor action should be re-evaluated.<br>College of Optometrists

The Milner and Goodale (1995) model of dual cortical visual systems suggests that, in the primate cortex, separate neural substrates dominate the tasks of visual perception and visuo-motor control. This model derives from a number of independent sources of evidence: anatomical, physiological and behavioural. Neuropsychological evidence in humans suggests that visual perception and visuo-motor control can be selectively impaired through damage to the ventral and dorsal visual streams respectively. Evidence has emerged that in the healthy human visual cortex, differentiable effects of visual illusions can be found between the two measures of perception and visuo- motor control. This evidence has been cited to support the Milner and Goodale (1995) model. The series of studies reported in this dissertation used a similar, but methodologically revised application of the illusion paradigm in the novel domain of orientation. Using two types of visual illusions, the simultaneous tilt illusion (STI) and the rod-and-frame illusion (RFI), a series of studies found patterns of association, dissociation and interaction that strongly support the Mihier and Goodale model. The critical issue, in terms of predicting the pattern of effects across perception and visuo-motor control tasks, was found to be the siting of the causal mechanisms underlying the illusion employed.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Oregon, 2007.<br>Typescript. Includes vita and abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 173-184). Also available for download via the World Wide Web; free to University of Oregon users.

There are often discrepancies in how a product is perceived in different representation media employed in typical product development processes. The first goal of this research project was to determine how visual illusions influence a designer's perception of a product across three representations: industrial design sketches, computer aided design (CAD) models, and physical prototypes (FDM rapid prototyping). A visualization experiment was conducted in which participants were asked to report how they perceived the shape and size of certain features, representing two types of illusions across the three model representations. Their statements were analyzed to identify the trends of how these two illusions affect overall appearance, categorized by representation type and the users' backgrounds (i.e., specialization and years of experience). The participants included students and professionals with various levels of engineering and industrial design experience. The analysis shows that there are differences in how designers see models depending on the representation media, and to some degree depending on the participants' professional background. The second goal was to explore the process of identifying such illusions automatically during the design process. In this regard, a discussion on how to implement the results from the visualization experiment is presented. Emphasis is on the potential development of a tool in CAD systems that would identify illusory effects and subsequently suggest potential design solutions. The possibility of using spectral analysis (fast Fourier transform) for an automated shape recognition capability in CAD systems is discussed.<br>Master of Science

L’hypothèse des voies visuelles attribue des rôles fonctionnels spécifiques aux réseaux cérébraux ventral et dorsal du système visuel. Ce modèle émet l’hypothèse selon laquelle la voie ventrale sous-tend le traitement de l'information pour la perception (vision-for-perception), alors que la voie dorsale est impliquée dans le traitement de l'information pour l'action (vision-for-action). L'idée de deux réseaux visuels distincts dans le cerveau humain a fait l’objet de très nombreux travaux de recherche au cours des 20 dernières années, mais les résultats apparaissent contradictoires. Cette thèse vise à éclaircir une partie du mystère de la façon dont la perception et l'action s’articulent. La figure d’Ebbinghaus a été utilisée pour distinguer la fonction d’une vision pour la perception, sensible aux illusions visuelles (taille relative), de la fonction d’une vision pour l’action affectée par les propriétés physiques de l’objet. Dans une première étude, nous avons quantifié l’illusion d’Ebbinghaus. Après, une démarche comparable de caractérisation des mouvements visuomoteurs a été implémentée sous des contraintes de précision et de vitesse. La caractérisation des mouvements visuomoteurs et la quantification de la perception des configurations Ebbinghaus ont ensuite permis de concevoir une tâche visuomotrice dont les cibles étaient des figures d’Ebbinghaus.La thèse a démontré que les voies ventrale et dorsale ne sont pas strictement distinctes fonctionnellement. Différentes variables informationnelles sont potentiellement utilisées pour ‘la vision pour la perception’ et ‘la vision pour l’action’ indépendamment du fait que certaines variables causent des illusions<br>The influential two-visual streams hypothesis ascribes specific functional roles to the ventral and the dorsal network of the visual system. The ventral system has been hypothesized to process information for conscious perception (vision-for-perception), whereas the dorsal stream processes information for action (vision-for-action). The idea of two separate visual networks in the human brain inspired an enormous amount of research over the past 20 or so years. The results are conflicting and divisive about the idea, causing a seemingly insurmountable gap between supporters and opponents. This thesis aims to unravel a part of the jigsaw puzzle of how perception and action are functioning. The Ebbinghaus figure has been used to distinguish vision-for-perception that is susceptible to visual illusions (i.e., relative size) from vision-for-action that remain unaffected by perceptions of relative sizes. Therefore, we quantified the Ebbinghaus figure based on its geometry and systematically assessed its size illusion. Subsequently, a visuomotor task was implemented in which precision and speed of the voluntary movement were investigated. The description of the visuomotor task and of the perception of Ebbinghaus figures lead to combine both visuomotor task and Ebbinghaus figures. A dynamical model was fit to the experimental data to investigate the effect on the behavioral dynamics.This thesis demonstrated that the ventral stream and dorsal stream are not strictly functionally distinct, and that potentially different informational variables are used for ‘vision for perception’ and ‘vision for action’ irrespective of whether certain variables cause (perceptual) illusions