Relevant bibliographies by topics / Walton, Jerome

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Walton, Jerome'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Walton, Jerome.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Walton, Jerome"

1

Morawska, Ewa. "Labor Migrations of Poles in the Atlantic World Economy, 1880–1914." Comparative Studies in Society and History 31, no. 2 (April 1989): 237–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0010417500015814.

Full text
Abstract:
The recent influx to the United States of a new large wave of immigrants from Hispanic America and Asia has reinvigorated immigration and ethnic studies, including those devoted to the analysis of the origins and process of international migrations. The accumulation of research in this field in the last fifteen years has brought about a shift in the theoretical paradigm designed to interpret these movements. The classical approach explains the mass flow into North America of immigrants (from Southern and Eastern Europe, in the period 1880 to 1914), as an international migration interpreted in terms of push and pull forces. Demographic and economic conditions prompted individuals to move from places with a surplus of population, little capital, and underemployment, to areas where labor was scarce and wages were higher (Jerome, 1926; Thomas, 1973; Piore, 1979; Gould, 1979). This interpretation views individual decisions and actions as the outcome of a rational economic calculation of the costs and benefits of migration. Recent studies of international population movements have reconceptualized this problem, recasting the unit(s) of analysis from separate nation-states, linked by one-way transfer of migrants between two unequally developed economies, to a comprehensive economic system composed of a dominant core and a dependent periphery— a world system that forms a complex network of supranational exchanges of technology, capital, and labor (Castells, 1975; Cardoso and Faletto, 1979; Kritz, 1983; Sassen-Koob, 1980; Portes, 1978; Portes and Walton, 1981; Wood, 1982). In this conceptualization, the development of the core and the underdevelopment of the peripheral societies are seen not as two distinct phenomena, but as two aspects of the same process—the expanding capitalist world system, explained in terms of each other. Generated by the economic imbalances and social dislocations resulting from the incorporation of the peripheries into the orbit of the core, international labor migrations between the developing and industrialized regions are viewed as part of a global circulation of resources within a single system of world economy. This interpretation shifts the central emphasis from the individual (and his/her decisions) to the broad structural determinants of human migrations within a global economic system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Wiertz, Svenja. "Jeremy Waldron: The Harm in Hate Speech." Zeitschrift für philosophische Literatur 2, no. 2 (May 2, 2014): 10–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.21827/zfphl.2.2.35327.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Shecaira, Fábio. "Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012." Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea 3, no. 1 (December 26, 2018): 230–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.21875/tjc.v3i1.22486.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

VERBICARO, Loiane Prado, and Pietra Galutty Bezerra de Castro. "DIREITO, CONTROLE JUDICIAL E DEMOCRACIA: O DEBATE ENTRE AS TEORIAS DEMOCRÁTICAS DE JEREMY WALDRON E RONALD DWORKIN." Revista Direito em Debate 26, no. 47 (September 21, 2017): 177. http://dx.doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2017.47.177-204.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>O trabalho tem por escopo analisar dois modelos democráticos antagônicos apresentados pelo aparato conceitual das teorias de Jeremy Waldron e Ronald Dworkin. Por intermédio de pesquisa bibliográfica e teórica, o artigo analisa o debate sobre as distintas concepções teóricas acerca do poder dos juízes de realizar a revisão judicial da legislação, em um cenário no qual o Poder Judiciário assume uma visível liderança político-institucional. Partindo das análises de Ronald Dworkin e Jeremy Waldron, a pesquisa problematiza a relação entre direito, controle judicial e democracia, à luz dos modelos de democracia substancial e procedimental. </p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

North, Richard. "A Response to Jeremy Waldron's Law and Disagreement." Political Studies Review 1, no. 2 (April 2003): 167–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1478-9299.t01-1-00002.

Full text
Abstract:
This article offers a critical response to arguments developed by Jeremy Waldron on the subject of democracy and constitutional rights. In particular it responds to three claims made by Waldron: first, he claims contemporary Western societies are characterised by deep and intractable disagreement; second, collectively binding decisions should be reached by democratic means alone; and third constitutional devices, such as bills of rights, should be rejected because they act as constraints on democracy. I argue that Waldron is unable to argue for the primacy of democracy from the baseline of intractable disagreement that he posit. He implicitly relies upon a position of moral consensus to confirm the priority of democracy over alternative decision-making procedures. Further, the moral stance that Waldron takes towards democracy is based upon a Kantian theory of justice which is shared by liberal-constitutional theorists, such as Rawls and Dworkin, who advocate bills of rights. Finally, Waldron does not provide the arguments necessary to justify the rejection of bills of rights. Good reasons exist for tempering democratic procedures with constitutional devices. However, this conclusion is qualified. It depends upon counterfactual claims that can be resolved only by taking into account the specific institutional and cultural practices of particular political systems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Dorsen, N., and M. Rosenfeld. "Roundtable: An exchange with Jeremy Waldron." International Journal of Constitutional Law 7, no. 1 (August 18, 2008): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon038.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lang, Gerald. "One Another’s Equals, by Jeremy Waldron." Mind 128, no. 509 (June 28, 2018): 249–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzy019.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Waluchow, Wil. "Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends." Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 18, no. 2 (July 2005): 207–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0841820900003994.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article, I defend Charters of Rights and the practices of judicial review to which they normally give rise against a number of objections one encounters in public and academic discourse, most notably in the work of Jeremy Waldron. In answering Waldron and his fellow critics, I develop a “living tree” or “common law” conception of Charters and show how it can be used successfully to answer their most powerful criticisms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Consani, Cristina Foroni. "A CRÍTICA DE JEREMY WALDRON AO CONSTITUCIONALISMO CONTEMPORÂNEO." Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR 59, no. 2 (August 31, 2014): 143. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v59i2.35730.

Full text
Abstract:
Este artigo apresenta e discute a crítica de Jeremy Waldron ao constitucionalismo contemporâneo, notadamente, às teorias constitucionais que centralizam a discussão acerca da democracia constitucional na proteção aos direitos fundamentais e em sua retirada do debate político. Neste sentido são apresentadas, primeiramente, as teses constitucionalistas às quais Waldron se opõe. Num segundo momento, são apresentadas suas críticas às teses constitucionalistas, assim como suas propostas para compatibilização entre o ideal constitucional e a democracia. Por fim, realiza-se uma avaliação acerca dos limites de cada uma das teorias em discussão.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Smith, M. N. "Dignity, Rank, and Rights By JEREMY WALDRON." Analysis 74, no. 4 (July 22, 2014): 740–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/analys/anu075.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Walton, Jerome"

1

Baldin, Mateus de Campos. "O princípio majoritário e a fundamentação da autoridade e da legitimidade do direito democrático segundo Jeremy Waldron." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/131737.

Full text
Abstract:
Em seu Law and Disagreement, Jeremy Waldron apresenta o que denomina de uma teoria democrática do direito, uma teoria normativa sobre a autoridade do direito baseada em sua legitimidade democrática. Para Waldron é a legitimidade do direito enquanto fruto de um processo de deliberação e votação majoritária que sustenta sua autoridade. Esse trabalho busca explicar a teoria democrática do direito de Waldron apresentando-a no contexto do liberalismo e do positivismo normativo. Dada a importância da legitimidade para a autoridade do direito em Waldron, esse trabalho discute também o que Waldron entende por legitimidade e sua distinção em relação à justificação, e defende a teoria de Waldron acerca da legitimidade como superior a outra teoria semelhante, defendida por John Simmons. Esse trabalho apresenta a teoria democrática do direito de Waldron no contexto das denominadas circunstâncias da política – a necessidade sentida de uma decisão comum e o desacordo sobre qual deve ser essa decisão. Essa tese defende que Waldron apresenta dois argumentos distintos em defesa de sua teoria: a) um argumento epistêmico, baseado na tese da justificação normal da autoridade, de Joseph Raz, adaptada ao contexto das decisões majoritárias, e que está suscetível a certos tipos de crítica, e b) um argumento de equidade, que recorre à igual consideração e respeito nas circunstâncias da política, o qual está suscetível a outros tipos de crítica. Essa tese defenderá que, dependendo do argumento, a posição de Waldron levará a distintos resultados teóricos e práticos (normativos).
In his Law and Disagreement, Jeremy Waldron presents what he names a democratic jurisprudence, a normative theory about the authority of law based in his democratic legitimacy. To Waldron, it is the legitimacy of law as a result of a process of deliberation and majoritarian voting that sustains its authority. This work seeks to explain Waldron’s democratic jurisprudence presenting it in the context of liberalism and normative positivism. Since legitimacy is important to the authority of law, this work also discuss what Waldron understands by legitimacy and its distinction from justification, and defends that Waldron’s theory about legitimacy is superior to another similar theory, defended by John Simmons. This work presents Waldron’s democratic jurisprudence in the context of the said circumstances of politics - the felt need for a common decision and the disagreement about what ought to be this decision. This thesis defends that Waldron presents two distinct arguments in defense of his theory: a) an epistemic argument, that is based on the normal justification thesis of Joseph Raz adapted to the context of majoritarian decision, and that is susceptible to certain kinds of critic, and b) an argument of fairness, that calls for equal considerations and respect in the circumstances of politics, and that is susceptible to other kinds of critic. This thesis will defend that, depending on the argument, Waldron’s position will lead to distinct theoretical and practical (normative) results.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Beaudoin, Simon. "La critique waldronienne de la révision judiciaire, ses fondements démocratiques et son potentiel." Master's thesis, Université Laval, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/27505.

Full text
Abstract:
Jeremy Waldron est un penseur d’origine néozélandaise s’intéressant aux rapports entre les législatures et les cours de justice. Tout au long de sa carrière, il a publié des articles critiquant la révision judiciaire et défendant la « dignité de la législation. » Ses travaux l’ont amené à s’opposer à H. L. A. Hart, à John Rawls ainsi qu’à Ronald Dworkin, et lui ont attiré de nombreuses critiques, entre autres celles de Richard Stacey et de Cécile Fabre. Sa thèse est qu’en vertu du droit de participation du peuple à la vie politique, ce dernier ne devrait pas être laissé hors de prises de décisions touchant à ses droits. Les cours de justice n’ayant pas de légitimité populaire, elles devraient s’effacer devant la volonté du peuple transmise par la législature. S’appuyant sur des penseurs classiques comme Aristote, Locke et Kant, Waldron démontre le surprenant soutien de ces derniers aux thèses de la sagesse populaire, de la primauté de la législation et de l’obéissance à la loi. Le présent mémoire a pour but d’explorer cette théorie originale et de la confronter à ses critiques. Après avoir, dans le premier chapitre, réuni les éléments nécessaires à une compréhension de l’argument participatif contre la révision judiciaire, nous nous intéresserons, dans le second, à un certain nombre d’arrêts des cours des États-Unis, du Canada et du Royaume-Uni, ce qui nous aidera à mieux saisir comment les juges perçoivent leurs rapports avec les législateurs. Le troisième chapitre sera celui où nous mettrons de l’avant les conséquences pratiques de l’application de la théorie de Waldron, mais aussi les critiques à son égard. Après avoir conclu que les précautions que notre auteur tente de mettre dans la présentation de sa théorie sont mises en échec par ses prémisses mêmes, nous tenterons de la modérer en montrant, grâce aux arguments de Leonid Sirota, comment elle pourrait être compatible avec la révision judiciaire en matière de fédéralisme.
Jeremy Waldron is a thinker of New Zealand origin interested by relations between the legislatures and courts. Throughout his career, he has published articles criticizing judicial review and defending the “dignity of legislation.” His work led him to oppose H. L. A. Hart, John Rawls as well as Ronald Dworkin, and have won him many critics, including those of Richard Stacey and Cécile Fabre. His thesis is that, by virtue of the right of popular participation in political life, it should not be left out of decisions affecting its right. The courts having no popular legitimacy, they should yield to the will of the people transmitted by the legislature. Drawing on classical thinkers like Aristotle, Locke and Kant, Waldron demonstrates the surprising support of these thinkers to the theses of popular wisdom, the primacy of the legislation and law’s obedience. This submission’s intention is to explore this original theory and confront it to its critics. Having, in the first chapter, put together the necessary elements for an understanding of the participatory argument against judicial review, we will consider, in the second chapter, a number of rulings from the USA, Canada and the United Kingdom courts, which will help us to understand how judges perceive their relationship with legislators. The third chapter will be where we will put forward the practical consequences of the application of Waldron’s theory, but also its critics. After concluding that the precautions that our author tries to put in the presentation of his theory are put in check by its very premises, we will try to moderate the resulting theory by showing, through Leonid Sirota’s arguments, how it could be compatible with federalism’ based judicial review.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Somerson, Jeremy [Verfasser], Pierre [Akademischer Betreuer] Hepp, Bastian [Akademischer Betreuer] Marquaß, Ronny [Akademischer Betreuer] Schulz, Andreas [Gutachter] Roth, and Walter [Gutachter] Brehm. "Mesenchymal Stem Cell Constructs for Repair of Focal Cartilage Defects in an Ovine Model / Jeremy Somerson ; Gutachter: Andreas Roth, Walter Brehm ; Pierre Hepp, Bastian Marquaß, Ronny Schulz." Leipzig : Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2016. http://d-nb.info/124069542X/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hwang, Karina T. "The Procedural Aspect of the Rule of Law: India as a Case Study for Distinguishing Concept from Conception." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2015. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1171.

Full text
Abstract:
In this thesis, the concept of the procedural aspect of the Rule of Law will be distinguished from what I argue are conceptions that are falsely promulgated as concept. The different aspects of the Rule of Law—form, substance, and procedure— are helpful in making the distinction between concept and conception. Examining procedure within the Rule of Law is particularly important, and I define a broader set of requirements of the concept of the procedural aspect of the Rule of Law. This concept is applied to understand the Indian conception of the Rule of Law, a particularly interesting case that brings out questions about culture and economic capacity. Ultimately, I argue that this broader set of requirements is better suited to evaluate the realization of the Rule of Law in all contexts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Tyler, John. "A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity." Thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-05-10885.

Full text
Abstract:
American jurisprudence currently applies two incompatible validity standards to determine which laws are enforceable. The natural law tradition evaluates validity by an uncertain standard of divine law, and its methodology relies on contradictory views of human reason. Legal positivism, on the other hand, relies on a methodology that commits the analytic fallacy, separates law from its application, and produces an incomplete model of law. These incompatible standards have created a schism in American jurisprudence that impairs the delivery of justice. This dissertation therefore formulates a new standard for legal validity. This new standard rejects the uncertainties and inconsistencies inherent in natural law theory. It also rejects the narrow linguistic methodology of legal positivism. In their stead, this dissertation adopts a pragmatic methodology that develops a standard for legal validity based on actual legal experience. This approach focuses on the operations of law and its effects upon ongoing human activities, and it evaluates legal principles by applying the experimental method to the social consequences they produce. Because legal history provides a long record of past experimentation with legal principles, legal history is an essential feature of this method. This new validity standard contains three principles. The principle of reason requires legal systems to respect every subject as a rational creature with a free will. The principle of reason also requires procedural due process to protect against the punishment of the innocent and the tyranny of the majority. Legal systems that respect their subjects' status as rational creatures with free wills permit their subjects to orient their own behavior. The principle of reason therefore requires substantive due process to ensure that laws provide dependable guideposts to individuals in orienting their behavior. The principle of consent recognizes that the legitimacy of law derives from the consent of those subject to its power. Common law custom, the doctrine of stare decisis, and legislation sanctioned by the subjects' legitimate representatives all evidence consent. The principle of autonomy establishes the authority of law. Laws must wield supremacy over political rulers, and political rulers must be subject to the same laws as other citizens. Political rulers may not arbitrarily alter the law to accord to their will. Legal history demonstrates that, in the absence of a validity standard based on these principles, legal systems will not treat their subjects as ends in themselves. They will inevitably treat their subjects as mere means to other ends. Once laws do this, men have no rest from evil.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Walton, Jerome"

1

Walton, Jerome. Rookie: The story of a season. South Bend, Ind: Diamond Communications, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Walton, Jerome. Rookie: The Story of a Season. Diamond Communications, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Walton, Jerome, and Jim Langford. Rookie: The Story of a Season. Diamond Communications, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Meisels, Tamar, and Jeremy Waldron. Debating Targeted Killing. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190906917.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
In this “for and against” book, Jeremy Waldron and Tamar Meisels defend competing positions on the legitimacy of targeted killing. The volume begins with a joint introduction, briefly setting out the terms of discussion, and presenting a short historical overview of the practice—i.e. what is targeted killing, and how has it been used in which conflicts and by whom. The debate opens with Meisels’ defense of targeted killing as a legitimate and desirable defensive anti-terrorism strategy, in keeping with both just war theory and international law. Meisels unreservedly defends the named killing of irregular combatants, most notably terrorists, during armed conflict. Additionally, she offers a possible moral justification for rare instances of assassination outside that framework, specifically with reference to recent cases of nuclear scientists developing weapons of mass destruction for the Iranian and Syrian governments. The debate continues with Waldron’s arguments focusing on the dangers and the inherent wrongness of governments’ having the right to maintain death lists—lists of named individuals who are to be hunted down and killed. Waldron notes the many differences between individualized targeting and ordinary combat, and he resists the attempt to assimilate targeted killing to killings in combat. Waldron also cautions us to consider carefully what a world of targeted killings will be like, the many abuses it is liable to, and why we should be very cautious, morally and strategically, in our thinking about it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Moody-Adams, Michele. Is There a “Safe Space” for Academic Freedom? Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791508.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter addresses the charge, implicit in justice-based arguments for intellectual “safe spaces” on college campuses, that protecting academic freedom undermines equality of educational opportunity for students targeted by harmful expression. The discussion clarifies this argument’s central concepts and assumptions, including the concepts of expressive harm, psychological trauma, and “triggers”; the notions of microaggression and implicit bias; and the idea (articulated in the work of Jeremy Waldron) that there is a connection between a community’s “aesthetics” and its capacity to assure its members of respectful consideration. It is argued that limiting or eliminating academic freedom would stifle the critical reflection and robust debate most likely to promote justice in the face of contemporary challenges. A university that is safe for robust debate about justice cannot provide the comforts of “home.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Darwall, Stephen. Equal Dignity and Rights. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199385997.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
The contemporary notion of human dignity is taken to ground the idea of human rights. This chapter investigates how dignity must be understood if it is to be capable of doing that. Beginning with earlier conceptions of dignity, both hierarchical conceptions of status and the Ciceronian idea of human beings in the “great chain of being,” the chapter argues that to be capable of grounding rights, dignity must include a fundamental second-personal authority for human beings to make claims and demands of one another. More specifically, it contests the idea, advanced by Jeremy Waldron and Anthony Appiah, that human dignity is best theorized within a conception of honor and status as elevating all persons to the same high status. Any such honored status fails to ground the fundamental authority to hold one another accountable that is necessary for a conception of human dignity that is capable of grounding human rights.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hegland, Frode, ed. The Future of Text. Future Text Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.48197/fot2020a.

Full text
Abstract:
This book is the first anthology of perspectives on the future of text, one of our most important mediums for thinking and communicating, with a Foreword by the co-inventor of the Internet, Vint. Cerf and a Postscript by the founder of the modern Library of Alexandria, Ismail Serageldin. In a time with astounding developments in computer special effects in movies and the emergence of powerful AI, text has developed little beyond spellcheck and blue links. In this work we look at myriads of perspectives to inspire a rich future of text through contributions from academia, the arts, business and technology. We hope you will be as inspired as we are as to the potential power of text truly unleashed. Contributions by Adam Cheyer • Adam Kampff • Alan Kay • Alessio Antonini • Alex Holcombe • Amaranth Borsuk • Amira Hanafi • Amos Paul Kennedy Jr. • Anastasia Salter • Andy Matuschak & Michael Nielsen • Ann Bessemans & María Pérez Mena • Andries Van Dam • Anne-Laure Le Cunff • Anthon Botha • Azlen Ezla • Barbara Beeton • Belinda Barnet • Ben Shneiderman • Bernard Vatant • Bob Frankston • Bob Horn • Bob Stein • Catherine C. Marshall • Charles Bernstein • Chris Gebhardt • Chris Messina • Christian Bök • Christopher Gutteridge • Claus Atzenbeck • Daniel Russel • Danila Medvedev • Danny Snelson • Daveed Benjamin • Dave King • Dave Winer • David De Roure • David Jablonowski • David Johnson • David Lebow • David M. Durant • David Millard • David Owen Norris • David Price • David Weinberger • Dene Grigar • Denise Schmandt-Besserat • Derek Beaulieu • Doc Searls • Don Norman • Douglas Crockford • Duke Crawford • Ed Leahy • Elaine Treharne • Élika Ortega • Esther Dyson • Esther Wojcicki • Ewan Clayton • Fiona Ross • Fred Benenson & Tyler Shoemaker • Galfromdownunder, aka Lynette Chiang • Garrett Stewart • Gyuri Lajos • Harold Thimbleby • Howard Oakley • Howard Rheingold • Ian Cooke • Iian Neil • Jack Park • Jakob Voß • James Baker • James O’Sullivan • Jamie Blustein • Jane Yellowlees Douglas • Jay David Bolter • Jeremy Helm • Jesse Grosjean • Jessica Rubart • Joe Corneli • Joel Swanson • Johanna Drucker • Johannah Rodgers • John Armstrong • John Cayle • John-Paul Davidson • Joris J. van Zundert • Judy Malloy • Kari Kraus & Matthew Kirschenbaum • Katie Baynes • Keith Houston • Keith Martin • Kenny Hemphill • Ken Perlin • Leigh Nash • Leslie Carr • Lesia Tkacz • Leslie Lamport • Livia Polanyi • Lori Emerson • Luc Beaudoin & Daniel Jomphe • Lynette Chiang • Manuela González • Marc-Antoine Parent • Marc Canter • Mark Anderson • Mark Baker • Mark Bernstein • Martin Kemp • Martin Tiefenthaler • Maryanne Wolf • Matt Mullenweg • Michael Joyce • Mike Zender • Naomi S. Baron • Nasser Hussain • Neil Jefferies • Niels Ole Finnemann • Nick Montfort • Panda Mery • Patrick Lichty • Paul Smart • Peter Cho • Peter Flynn • Peter Jenson & Melissa Morocco • Peter J. Wasilko • Phil Gooch • Pip Willcox • Rafael Nepô • Raine Revere • Richard A. Carter • Richard Price • Richard Saul Wurman • Rollo Carpenter • Sage Jenson & Kit Kuksenok • Shane Gibson • Simon J. Buckingham Shum • Sam Brooker • Sarah Walton • Scott Rettberg • Sofie Beier • Sonja Knecht • Stephan Kreutzer • Stephanie Strickland • Stephen Lekson • Stevan Harnad • Steve Newcomb • Stuart Moulthrop • Ted Nelson • Teodora Petkova • Tiago Forte • Timothy Donaldson • Tim Ingold • Timur Schukin & Irina Antonova • Todd A. Carpenter • Tom Butler-Bowdon • Tom Standage • Tor Nørretranders • Valentina Moressa • Ward Cunningham • Dame Wendy Hall • Zuzana Husárová. Student Competition Winner Niko A. Grupen, and competition runner ups Catherine Brislane, Corrie Kim, Mesut Yilmaz, Elizabeth Train-Brown, Thomas John Moore, Zakaria Aden, Yahye Aden, Ibrahim Yahie, Arushi Jain, Shuby Deshpande, Aishwarya Mudaliar, Finbarr Condon-English, Charlotte Gray, Aditeya Das, Wesley Finck, Jordan Morrison, Duncan Reid, Emma Brodey, Gage Nott, Aditeya Das and Kamil Przespolewski. Edited by Frode Hegland.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Riley, Jonathan. Freedom of Speech. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.234.

Full text
Abstract:
John Stuart Mill is a liberal icon, widely praised in particular for his stirring defense of freedom of speech. A neo-Millian theory of free speech is outlined and contrasted in important respects with what Frederick Schauer calls “the free speech ideology” that surrounds the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and with Schauer’s own “pre-legal” theory of free speech. Mill cannot reasonably be interpreted to defend free speech absolutism if speech is understood broadly to include all expressive conduct. Rather, he is best interpreted as defending an expedient policy of laissez-faire with exceptions, where four types of expression are distinguished, three of which (labeled Types B, C, and D) are public or other-regarding, whereas the fourth (labeled Type A) is private or self-regarding. Types C and D expression are unjust and ought to be suppressed by law and public stigma. They deserve no protection from coercive interference: they are justified exceptions to the policy of letting speakers alone. Consistently with this, a moral right to freedom of speech gives absolute protection to Type B public expression, which is “almost” self-regarding. Type A private expression also receives absolute protection, but it is truly self-regarding conduct and therefore covered by the moral right of absolute self-regarding liberty identified by Mill in On Liberty. There is no need for a distinct right of freedom of expression with respect to self-regarding speech. Strictly speaking, then, an expedient laissez-faire policy for public expression leaves the full protection of freedom of private expression to the right of self-regarding liberty.An important application of the neo-Millian theory relates to an unjust form of hate speech that may be described as group libel. By creating, or threatening to create, a social atmosphere in which a targeted group is forced to live with a maliciously false public identity of criminality or subhumanity, such a group libel creates, or significantly risks creating, social conditions in which all individuals associated with the group must give up their liberties of self-regarding conduct and of Type B expression to avoid conflict with prejudiced and belligerent members of society, even though the libel itself does not directly threaten any assignable individual with harm or accuse him or her of any wrongdoing of his or her own. This Millian perspective bolsters arguments such as those offered by Jeremy Waldron for suppressing group libels. America is an outlier among advanced civil societies with respect to the regulation of such unjust hate speech, and its “free speech ideology” ought to be suitably reformed so that group libels are prevented or punished as immoral and unconstitutional.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Walton, Jerome"

1

Nye, Hillary. "Waldron, Jeremy: Rule of Law." In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 1–7. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_26-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Preface by Jeremy Waldron." In Veil Politics in Liberal Democratic States, xi—xiv. Cambridge University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139164993.001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Walter, William, and William Walter. "1969 FROM WILLIAM WALTER 24 May 1808." In The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 7: January 1802 to December 1808, edited by J. R. Dinwiddy, 497. Oxford University Press, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00066250.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Walter, William, and William Walter. "1972 FROM WILLIAM WALTER 2 June 1808." In The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 7: January 1802 to December 1808, edited by J. R. Dinwiddy, 505. Oxford University Press, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00066253.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Walter, William, and William Walter. "1979 FROM WILLIAM WALTER 14 July 1808." In The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 7: January 1802 to December 1808, edited by J. R. Dinwiddy. Oxford University Press, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00066260.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Walter, William, and William Walter. "1984 FROM WILLIAM WALTER 8 August 1808." In The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 7: January 1802 to December 1808, edited by J. R. Dinwiddy, 523. Oxford University Press, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00066265.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Walter, William, and William Walter. "2018 FROM WILLIAM WALTER 16 December 1808." In The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 7: January 1802 to December 1808, edited by J. R. Dinwiddy. Oxford University Press, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00066299.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Coady, C. A. J. "Terrorism and Its Claims to “Distinctive Significance”." In The Meaning of Terrorism, 54–80. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199603961.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 3 addresses four philosophical attempts to show that terrorist attacks, definitional issues aside, have a special moral significance. In their very different ways, these philosophers articulate a concern about terrorism also widely held amongst non-specialists. The philosophers addressing the idea of special significance most directly are Samuel Scheffler, Jeremy Waldron, and Lionel McPherson. Waldron does not use the phrase “special moral significance,” but the idea is at work in his discussion. The fourth is Karen Jones, who doesn’t use “special significance” but her discussion of terrorist disruption of “basal security” seems to mark some distinctive moral feature of terrorism in addition to its being a tactic committed to attacking non-combatants. That makes her claim relevant here. The chapter argues that these various attempts fail to make the strong case they promise, and that the failure is instructive for our understanding of terrorism and for policies to deal with it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kramer, Matthew H. "Hatred, Dignity, and Freedom of Expression." In Freedom of Expression as Self-Restraint, 244–95. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868651.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
In his 2012 book The Harm in Hate Speech, Jeremy Waldron has argued sustainedly in favor of hate-speech laws like those that have been enacted in most of the European liberal democracies and in Canada and the Antipodes. His main target is the American position on hate speech, for in the USA any laws along the lines of those just mentioned would be violative of the First Amendment to the American Constitution. This chapter maintains that the gist of the American position is not only a corollary of the First Amendment but also a corollary of the moral principle of freedom of expression. Even more strongly, the chapter contends that the hate-speech statutes championed by Waldron are profoundly demeaning for any country wherein they are adopted. The adoption of such statutes both ensures and presupposes that a system of governance has failed to meet its responsibility to bring about the political and social and economic conditions under which every member of a society can be warranted in harboring an ample sense of self-respect.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bentham, Jeremy. "1970 TO WILLIAM WALTER 24 May 1808 (Aet 60)." In The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 7: January 1802 to December 1808, edited by J. R. Dinwiddy, 498–503. Oxford University Press, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00066251.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Walton, Jerome"

1

de Meira, Renan. "Liberdade de expressão e discurso de ódio: notas sobre o debate entre Jeremy Waldron e Ronald Dworkin." In II Congresso Internacional de Direito Constitucional e Filosofia Política. Initia Via, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.17931/dcfp2015_v04_a52.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Waldin, Jeremy, and Ben Baty. "Recovering the Waiho – Emergency response and recovery of the Waiho River Bailey Bridge." In IABSE Congress, Christchurch 2021: Resilient technologies for sustainable infrastructure. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/christchurch.2021.0537.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>Waiho – (verb) (-ngia,-tia) <i>to let be, leave alone, put, place, ignore.</i></p><p>SH6 Waiho Bailey Bridge is located just south of Franz Josef township in the South Island of New Zealand and is a critical connection for the West Coast. The Bailey bridge was first constructed in 1990 and has since been raised and extended three times due to significant aggradation of the riverbed. During a massive storm event on March 26, 2019 the northern abutment and northern- most pier were washed out leading to collapse of several spans of the bridge. The cost caused by the loss of the bridge was estimated to be in the order of $2-3M per day. Consequently, there was intense pressure on Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency to restore access across the river.</p><p>As Team Leader and Deputy Team Leader of the West Coast Bridge Management Contract, Jeremy Waldin and Ben Baty led the $6.5M emergency recovery managing an emergency response team which worked across multiple organisations to recover this 170m long bridge in just 18 days.</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Walton, Jerome' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography