Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Weeds – Control – North Dakota

Contents

Journal articles

Academic literature on the topic 'Weeds – Control – North Dakota'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Weeds – Control – North Dakota.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Weeds – Control – North Dakota"

1

Soltani, Nader, J. Anita Dille, Robert H. Gulden, et al. "Potential Yield Loss in Dry Bean Crops Due to Weeds in the United States and Canada." Weed Technology 32, no. 3 (2018): 342–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.116.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractEarlier reports have summarized crop yield losses throughout various North American regions if weeds were left uncontrolled. Offered here is a report from the current WSSA Weed Loss Committee on potential yield losses due to weeds based on data collected from various regions of the United States and Canada. Dry bean yield loss estimates were made by comparing dry bean yield in the weedy control with plots that had >95% weed control from research studies conducted in dry bean growing regions of the United States and Canada over a 10-year period (2007 to 2016). Results from these fiel

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Dexter, Alan G. "History of Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) Herbicide Rate Reduction in North Dakota and Minnesota." Weed Technology 8, no. 2 (1994): 334–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0890037x00038884.

Full text

Abstract:

Phenmedipham was registered for use at 1.1 to 1.7 kg ai/ha in 1970 and desmedipham at 1.1 to 1.4 kg ai/ha in 1974 for postemergence control of broadleaf weeds in sugarbeet. Phenmedipham was sold from 1970 through 1981 and desmedipham plus phenmedipham (1:1), as a premixed product, has been sold since 1982. Development of multiple applications of reduced rates began in 1972 primarily to reduce sugarbeet injury. The technique was promoted to farmers after 1976. Ahalf-rate of phenmedipham and/or desmedipham applied twice at a 5- to 7-d interval controlled weeds better and caused less sugarbeet in

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Puka-Beals, Jesse, and Greta Gramig. "Weed Suppression Potential of Living Mulches, Newspaper Hydromulches, and Compost Blankets in Organically Managed Carrot Production." HortTechnology 31, no. 1 (2021): 89–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/horttech04745-20.

Full text

Abstract:

Direct seeding into strip-tilled zones (STZs) of living mulches may require weed suppression tactics for soil surfaces exposed within the STZ. Three surface mulch options (hydromulch, compost blanket, and a no-mulch control) were evaluated for their ability to suppress weeds and improve crop performance when applied in STZs seeded to carrot (Daucus carota). These STZs were located within one of five living mulch options [red clover (Trifolium pratense), white clover (Trifolium repens), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), a weed-free control, and a weedy control]. From measurements spanning 2

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

DeVuyst, Eric A., Thomas Foissey, and George O. Kegode. "An economic comparison of alternative and traditional cropping systems in the northern Great Plains, USA." Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21, no. 1 (2006): 68–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/raf2005128.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractCurrent production practices in the Red River Valley of North Dakota and Minnesota involve use of extensive tillage and/or herbicides to control weeds. Given the erosion potential, environmental concerns associated with herbicides, and herbicide-resistant weeds, alternative cropping systems that mitigate these problems need to be assessed economically. Furthermore, the role that government commodity programs play in the adoption of more ecologically friendly cropping systems needs to be determined. We evaluated 8 years of yield data (1994–2001) from field plots near Fargo, North Dakota

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Lym, Rodney G., Roger L. Becker, Michael J. Moechnig, Mary B. Halstvedt, and Vanelle F. Peterson. "Native Grass Establishment following Application of Pyridine Herbicides." Invasive Plant Science and Management 10, no. 01 (2017): 110–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/inp.2017.6.

Full text

Abstract:

Invasive species management is often more successful if desirable species are seeded after the target weed is controlled. However, control of invasive plants must be maintained following reseeding or the seeded species may fail to establish. A regional study conducted in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota evaluated the effect of aminopyralid, clopyralid, or picloram applied in the fall prior to fall-dormant seeding or seeding the following spring on cool- and warm-season native grass species establishment. Herbicides were applied at standard rates used to control invasive broadleaf weed

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Soltani, Nader, J. Anita Dille, Darren E. Robinson, et al. "Potential yield loss in sugar beet due to weed interference in the United States and Canada." Weed Technology 32, no. 6 (2018): 749–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.88.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe objective of this WSSA Weed Loss Committee report is to provide quantitative data on the potential yield loss in sugar beet due to weed interference from the major sugar beet growing areas of the United States and Canada. Researchers and extension specialists who conducted research on weed control in sugar beet in the United States and Canada provided quantitative data on sugar beet yield loss due to weed interference in their regions. Specifically, data were requested from weed control studies in sugar beet from up to 10 individual studies per calendar year over a 15-yr period bet

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Dale, Trevor M., Karen A. Renner, and Alexandra N. Kravchenko. "Effect of Herbicides on Weed Control and Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) Yield and Quality." Weed Technology 20, no. 1 (2006): 150–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/wt-04-278r1.1.

Full text

Abstract:

The “micro-rate” application, a POST combination of desmedipham plus phenmedipham at 0.045 + 0.045 kg ai/ha (desphen) or desmedipham plus phenmedipham plus ethofumesate (1:1: 1 ratio) (desphenetho) at 0.09 kg ai/ha plus triflusulfuron at 0.004 kg ai/ha plus clopyralid at 0.026 kg ae/ha plus 1.5% methylated seed oil received registration in 1998 and 2000 in North Dakota and Michigan, respectively. Herbicide rates are reduced by 80%, compared to standard-split applications, and growers typically apply the micro-rate three to five times to very small weeds that are 1 cm or less in height. In stan

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Haugrud, Nathan H., and Thomas J. Peters. "Inter-row cultivation timing effects on waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) control and sugarbeet yield and quality." Weed Technology 35, no. 3 (2021): 394–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2021.10.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe invasion of waterhemp into northern sugarbeet growing regions has prompted producers to re-integrate inter-row cultivation into weed management programs, as no currently registered herbicides can control glyphosate-resistant waterhemp POST in crop. Inter-row cultivation was a common weed control practice in sugarbeet until the release of glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet cultivars in 2008 made the use of inter-row cultivation unnecessary. In the late 2010s, producers began again to use inter-row cultivation to remove weeds that glyphosate did not control, but producers need informatio

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Almquist, Travis L., Katie L. Wirt, Jason W. Adams, and Rodney G. Lym. "Adaptive Development of Yellow Toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) Chemical Control Recommendations." Invasive Plant Science and Management 8, no. 3 (2015): 276–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/ipsm-d-14-00082.1.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractYellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris P. Mill.) infestations in North Dakota increased 300-fold from 1997 to 2011, when the plant was added to the state noxious weed list. Long-term control of other invasive species had included biological control agents, but no effective agents for yellow toadflax had been identified, so a control program using herbicides was needed. The objective was to shift from short-term control with picloram applied in the fall at maximum allowed rates to long-term management with minimal nontarget species impact with an adaptive management approach. Yellow toadflax

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Sell, Randall S., Dean A. Bangsund, and F. Larry Leistritz. "Euphorbia esula: perceptions by ranchers and land managers." Weed Science 47, no. 6 (1999): 740–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500091426.

Full text

Abstract:

Euphorbia esula is an exotic perennial weed that is estimated to infest 650,000 ha in North and South Dakota, Montana, and Wyoming. The estimated annual economic effect of E. esula infestations in the four-state area is about $130 million. We present the results of a survey of ranchers, local decision makers, and public land managers of grazing and nongrazing property from a five-county area in North and South Dakota, Montana, and Wyoming. A total of 565 ranchers, local decision makers, and public land managers were surveyed, which resulted in 267 completed questionnaires. The main objective o

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!