Academic literature on the topic 'Westphalia (Kingdom)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Westphalia (Kingdom).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Westphalia (Kingdom)"
Rowe, Michael. "Napoleon’s Paper Kingdom: The Life and Death of Westphalia, 1807–1813." German History 36, no. 2 (February 20, 2018): 281–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerhis/ghy008.
Full textHanley, Wayne. "Sam A. Mustafa. Napoleon’s Paper Kingdom: The Life and Death of Westphalia, 1807–1813." American Historical Review 124, no. 2 (April 1, 2019): 760–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhz205.
Full textBerryman, Todd Blake. "The Poetry of Discontent: Jérôme Bonaparte and his Alleged Exploitation of the Kingdom of Westphalia." European History Quarterly 42, no. 4 (October 2012): 578–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265691412458411.
Full textKroppenberg, Inge, and Nikolaus Linder. "Kroppenberg, Inge/Nikolaus Linder, „…als große Unruhen in Göttingen wegen der Gensd'armen Statt fanden …“. Gustav Hugo und die Studentenunruhen 1809/10." Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung 136, no. 1 (June 26, 2019): 164–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zrgg-2019-0006.
Full textJames, Leighton S. "Napoleon’s Paper Kingdom: The Life and Death of Westphalia, 1807–1813. By Sam A. Mustafa.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017. Pp. xxiv+342. $99.00 (cloth); $94.00 (e-book)." Journal of Modern History 91, no. 3 (September 2019): 680–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/704405.
Full textMeng, Weizhan, and Weixing Hu. "Reacting to China’s rise throughout history: balancing and accommodating in East Asia." International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 20, no. 1 (September 11, 2018): 119–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcy022.
Full textWeis, Monique. "Le mariage protestant au 16e siècle: desacralisation du lien conjugal et nouvelle “sacralisation” de la famille." Vínculos de Historia. Revista del Departamento de Historia de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, no. 8 (June 20, 2019): 134. http://dx.doi.org/10.18239/vdh_2019.08.07.
Full textANDOLFATTO, LORENZO. "UTOPIA/WUTUOBANG AS A TRAVELLING MARKER OF TIME." Historical Journal, September 1, 2020, 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x19000621.
Full text"Buchbesprechungen." Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung: Volume 47, Issue 2 47, no. 2 (April 1, 2020): 251–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/zhf.47.2.251.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Westphalia (Kingdom)"
Kayuni, Happy Mickson. "The Westphalian model and trans-border ethnic identity : the case of the Chewa Kingdom of Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia." University of the Western Cape, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5277.
Full textThis study is an investigation of the informal trans-border Chewa ethnic movement of Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia and its relationship to the formal state boundaries defined by the Westphalian model. The Chewa refer themselves as belonging to a Kingdom (formerly the Maravi Kingdom) which currently cuts across the three modern African states of Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia and its paramount, King Gawa Undi, is based in Zambia. The secretariat of the kingdom is Chewa Heritage Foundation (CHEFO), which is headquartered in Malawi. The fundamental quest of this study is to investigate how the Chewa understand, experience, manage and interpret the overlap between formal states (as defined by the Westphalian model) and informal trans-border ethnic identity without raising cross-border conflicts in the process. Indeed, it is this paradoxical co-existence of contradictory features of Westphalian political boundaries and trans-border ethnic identity that initially inspired this study. The main research aim is to interrogate whether the Chewa Kingdom (of Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia) is challenging or confirming state boundaries, and to reflect on what this means for the contemporary Westphalian model. In International Relations (IR), the Westphalian model provides the assumption that states are independent actors with a political authority based on territory and autonomy. Despite a large number of criticisms of the model, it has not completely been dismissed in explaining some elements of the international system. This is evident by the underlying assumptions and perspectives that still persist in IR literature as well as the growing contemporary debates on the model, especially on its related elements of state sovereignty and citizenship. In Africa, the literature focuses on the formal structures and ignores the role of informal trans-border traditional entities - specifically, how trans-border traditional entities affect the re-definition of state and sovereignty in Africa. Such ignorance has led to a vacuum in African IR of the potentiality of the informal to complement the formal intra-regional state entities. Within a historical and socio-cultural framework, the study utilises [social] constructivism and cultural nationalism theories to critically investigate and understand the unfolding relationship between the Westphalian state and Chewa trans-border community. Another supporting debate explored is the relevance of traditional authorities under the ambit of politics of representation. In this case, the study fits in the emerging debate on the meaning, experience and relevance of state sovereignty and national identity (citizenship) in Africa. Drawing on a wide range of sources (informant interviews, focus group discussions, Afrobarometer survey data sets, newspaper articles and comparative literature surveys in Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia), the study finds that although the upsurge of Chewa transborder ethnic identity is theoretically contradictory to the Westphalian model, in practice it is actually complementary. Within the framework of [social] constructivism, the state has with some variations demonstrated flexibility and innovation to remain legitimate by co-opting the Chewa movement. In this case, the study finds that the co-existence of Westphalian model and trans-border Chewa ethnic identity is mainly due to the flexibility of the state to accommodate informal ethnic expressions in ways that ultimately reinforces the mutual dependence of the states and the ethnic group. For instance, during the Chewa Kulamba ceremony held in Zambia, the state borders are „relaxed‟ to allow unhindered crossing for the participants to the ceremony. This does not entail weakness of the state but its immediate relevance by allowing communal cultural expressions. Another finding is that the Chewa expression of ethnic identity could not be complete if it did not take a trans-border perspective. This set-up ensures that each nation-state plays a role in the expression of Chewa ethnic identity - missing one nation-state means that the historical and contemporary relevance of this identity would be lost. It is also this same set-up that limits the movement's possibility to challenge the formal state. This argument reinforces the social constructivist perspective that sovereignty is not static but dynamic because it fulfils different uses in a particular context. The overall argument of this study is that the revival of the informal Chewa trans-border traditional entity offers a new, exciting and unexplored debate on the Westphalian model that is possibly unique to the African set-up. One theoretical/methodological contribution of this study is that it buttresses some suggestions that when studying African IR, we have to move beyond the strict disciplinary boundaries that have defined the field and search for other related African state experiences. The study also strengthens one of the new approaches in understanding IR as social relations - in this approach, individuals and their activities or their social systems play a prominent role.
Books on the topic "Westphalia (Kingdom)"
Marxkors, Heinz. Emigrants from the former counties of Büren and Paderborn in the former Province of Westphalia in the former Kingdom of Prussia emigrated to St. Libory, St. Clair County, State of Illinois/U.S.A. Salem, Mass: Higginson Book Co., 2004.
Find full textNapoleon's Paper Kingdom: The Life and Death of Westphalia, 1807-1813. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2017.
Find full textPivka, Otto. Napoleon's German Allies (1) : Westfalia and Kleve-Berg. Osprey Publishing, 1992.
Find full textAston, Nigel. The Established Church. Edited by William Doyle. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199291205.013.0017.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Westphalia (Kingdom)"
Todorov, Nicola P. "The Napoleonic Administrative System in the Kingdom of Westphalia." In The Napoleonic Empire and the New European Political Culture, 173–85. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137271396_17.
Full textPlanert, Ute. "Resistance to Napoleonic Reform in the Grand Duchy of Berg, the Kingdom of Westphalia and the South German States." In The Napoleonic Empire and the New European Political Culture, 148–59. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137271396_15.
Full textSorkin, David. "War." In Jewish Emancipation, 102–17. Princeton University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691164946.003.0009.
Full textBabones, Salvatore. "Right concept, wrong country." In American Tianxia. Policy Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447336808.003.0001.
Full textHamerow, Helena. "Epilogue: Trajectories and Turning-Points." In Early Medieval Settlements. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199246977.003.0011.
Full text