Relevant bibliographies by topics / Word-based morphology

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Word-based morphology'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 9 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Word-based morphology.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Word-based morphology"

1

BLEVINS, JAMES P. "Word-based morphology." Journal of Linguistics 42, no. 3 (October 13, 2006): 531–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226706004191.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper examines two contrasting perspectives on morphological analysis, and considers inflectional patterns that bear on the choice between these alternatives. On what is termed an ABSTRACTIVE perspective, surface word forms are regarded as basic morphotactic units of a grammatical system, with roots, stems and exponents treated as abstractions over a lexicon of word forms. This traditional standpoint is contrasted with the more CONSTRUCTIVE perspective of post-Bloomfieldian models, in which surface word forms are ‘built’ from sub-word units. Part of the interest of this contrast is that it cuts across conventional divisions of morphological models. Thus, realization-based models are morphosyntactically ‘word-based’ in the sense that they regard words as the minimal meaningful units of a grammatical system. Yet morphotactically, these models tend to adopt a constructive ‘root-based’ or ‘stem-based’ perspective. An examination of some form-class patterns in Saami, Estonian and Georgian highlights advantages of an abstractive model, and suggests that these advantages derive from the fact that sets of words often predict other word forms and determine a morphotactic analysis of their parts, whereas sets of sub-word units are of limited predictive value and typically do not provide enough information to recover word forms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ussishkin, Adam. "Semitic Morphology: Root-based or Word-based?" Morphology 16, no. 1 (September 7, 2006): 37–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11525-006-0002-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Shapiro, Michael C. "Hindi morphology: A word-based description." Lingua 108, no. 1 (May 1999): 87–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(98)00049-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

LEE, LESLIE, and FARRELL ACKERMAN. "Word-based morphology–syntax interdependencies: Thai passives." Journal of Linguistics 53, no. 2 (December 28, 2015): 359–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226715000456.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article, we argue that insights concerning the word-based nature of morphology, especially the hypothesis that periphrastic expressions are cross-linguistically common exponents of lexical relations, permit a novel lexical constructional analysis of periphrastic predicates that preserves the restriction of morphosyntactic mapping operations, such as passive, to the lexicon. We do this in the context of the periphrastic Thaithuukpassive, justifying in detail the monoclausal status of the construction, its flat phrase structure, the semantics of affectedness associated with it, and its paradigmatic opposition with other passive constructions in the language. Building on the proposal of Bonami & Webelhuth (2013) and Bonami (2015) that a periphrase relies on a form of the main verb that selects collocationally for an auxiliary element, we develop an analysis of Thai periphrastic passives in which the surface syntax of these predicates is mediated by appropriate lexical representations. Crucially, the rearrangement of arguments in the passive is done lexically, via lexical rule, rather than in the syntax. The resulting analysis is consistent with the classical tradition of Word and Paradigm morphology, which posits periphrastic expression as one of several encoding strategies for the realization of morphosyntactic information within words.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Posthumus, L. C. "Word-based versus root-based morphology in the African languages." South African Journal of African Languages 14, no. 1 (January 1994): 28–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02572117.1994.10587027.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rosa, Maria Carlota, Alan Ford, Rajendra Singh, and Gita Martohardjono. "Pace Panini: Towards a Word-Based Theory of Morphology." Language 75, no. 4 (December 1999): 846. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/417755.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Dasgupta, Probal. "Pace Panini: Towards a word-based theory of morphology." Journal of Pragmatics 32, no. 4 (March 2000): 513–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00021-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Parhat, Sardar, Mijit Ablimit, and Askar Hamdulla. "Uyghur short-text classification based on reliable sub-word morphology." International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems 11, no. 3 (2019): 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijris.2019.10023443.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Parhat, Sardar, Mijit Ablimit, and Askar Hamdulla. "Uyghur short-text classification based on reliable sub-word morphology." International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems 11, no. 3 (2019): 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijris.2019.102606.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Jiang, Yajie. "The Role of Morphology in English Vocabulary Teaching." Learning & Education 9, no. 2 (November 10, 2020): 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v9i2.1422.

Full text
Abstract:
Vocabulary is the most important factor in language composition. Guiding English learners to acquire English vocabulary is an important task. Based on the morphological theory, this research starts from the internal structure of the word and tries to explore the rules of word formation in English vocabulary in order to provide some useful enlightenment for English vocabulary acquisition.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Word-based morphology"

1

Shalal, Fadhel. "A word-based approach to Russian derivational morphology with the suffix {+к(а)}." Thesis, University of Sheffield, 2018. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/21306/.

Full text
Abstract:
In Russian, there are derivational suffixes which are distinguished by the uniform manner in which they form surface words. These suffixes keep the same phonological/orthographic composition and are found with surface words derived only from a particular base, as seen with {+тель} and {+ость}. However, the suffix {+к(а)} displays more complexity than the suffixes above. While the Item-and-Arrangement morphemic approach seems acceptable when morphemes are organised in a linear arrangement, such as демократ /demokrat/ ‘democrat (m.)’ > демократка /demokratka/ ‘democrat (f.)’, this approach cannot be generalised over other coinages due to the mismatch of the following: 1) the orthographic correspondence as illustrated by болгарин /bolgarin/ ‘Bulgarian (m.)’ > болгарка /bolgarka/ ‘Bulgarian (f.)’; and 2) the semantic relatedness as found with вода /voda/ ‘water’ > водка /vodka/ ‘vodka’. Moreover, the formation of this suffix possibly differs from other counterpart suffixes that denote similar functions/meanings. For instance, this suffix expresses the diminutive meaning as found by дед /ded/ ‘grandfather’ > дедка /dedka/ ‘grandfather (dim.)’. However, the majority of suffixes that denote diminutiveness are masculine, such as {+ок} (город /gorod/ ‘city’ > городок /gorodok/ ‘small city’); {+ик} (дом /dom/ ‘house’ > домик /domik/ ‘small house’); {+чик} (роман /roman/ ‘novel’ > романчик /romanchik/ ‘small novel’), etc. One of the outcomes of this study is a contribution to the debate on morphological models from a morphological perspective only. Other approaches (e.g. psycholinguistics, frequency of occurrence, corpus-based study, experimental-based study, and prototype-radial model) are employed to determine which model describes the word formation process in Russian. I identify the correlation of productivity of {+к(a)} with its mental representation and frequency factor. Also, I demonstrate the effect of relative frequency on coinages of {+к(a)} using corpus materials. The reaction time of native speakers is tested to evaluate whether coinages of {+к(a)} are mentally perceived according to storage or compositional process. Finally, I provide a new look at the semantic distribution of {+к(a)} based on ‘prototype theory’ which connects multiple meanings/functions of {+к(a)} according to ‘family relatedness’ concept. My data on {+к(a)} come from a variety of sources, such as dictionaries, corpora, and an online experiment. I make use of data from a number of Russian dictionaries to ascertain the scope of use of this suffix and provide information on its semantics. Corpora data, however, constitute a more representative source of modern language usage, and I use them to assess the importance of frequency of occurrence. Finally, I employ experimental data to test whether the cognitive perception of native speakers supports a single-route account of word-formation. The suffix {+к(а)} has a substantial influence in Russian since it provides a multiplicity of semantic meanings. It is used in forming a larger number of words compared to other suffixes. Its formation includes a variety of linguistic phenomena which are associated with word formation process (e.g. additive morphology, subtractive morphology, allomorphy, and mutation). This complexity requires explanation. After providing such an explanation and comprehensive details about suffixation in Russian, it will be argued that {+к(a)} can serve as an appropriate tool in order to assess the performance of models of word-formation; it is therefore used to test our hypotheses. I find that the word-based approach represented by the Word and Paradigm (WP) gives a more convincing explanation of linguistic phenomena associated with {+к(а)} and offers a better explanation for the description of {+к(а)} than other approaches, particularly a morpheme-based approach represented by the Item and Arrangement model (IA) or a process-based approach represented by the Item and Process model (IP).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Sims, Andrea D. "Minding the gaps inflectional defectiveness in a paradigmatic theory /." Columbus, Ohio : Ohio State University, 2006. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=osu1157550938.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Eklund, Robert. "A Probabilistic Tagging Module Based on Surface Pattern Matching." Thesis, Stockholm University, Department of Computational Linguistics, Institute of Linguistics, 1993. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-135294.

Full text
Abstract:
A problem with automatic tagging and lexical analysis is that it is never 100 % accurate. In order to arrive at better figures, one needs to study the character of what is left untagged by automatic taggers. In this paper untagged residue outputted by the automatic analyser SWETWOL (Karlsson 1992) at Helsinki is studied. SWETWOL assigns tags to words in Swedish texts mainly through dictionary lookup. The contents of the untagged residue files are described and discussed, and possible ways of solving different problems are proposed. One method of tagging residual output is proposed and implemented: the left-stripping method, through which untagged words are bereaved their left-most letters, searched in a dictionary, and if found, tagged according to the information found in the said dictionary. If the stripped word is not found in the dictionary, a match is searched in ending lexica containing statistical information about word classes associated with that particular word form (i.e., final letter cluster, be this a grammatical suffix or not), and the relative frequency of each word class. If a match is found, the word is given graduated tagging according to the statistical information in the ending lexicon. If a match is not found, the word is stripped of what is now its left-most letter and is recursively searched in a dictionary and ending lexica (in that order). The ending lexica employed in this paper are retrieved from a reversed version of Nusvensk Frekvensordbok (Allén 1970), and contain endings of between one and seven letters. The contents of the ending lexica are to a certain degree described and discussed. The programs working according to the principles described are run on files of untagged residual output. Appendices include, among other things, LISP source code, untagged and tagged files, the ending lexica containing one and two letter endings and excerpts from ending lexica containing three to seven letters.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Faghiri, Pegah. "La morphologie du pluriel nominal du persan d’après la théorie Whole Word Morphology." Thèse, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/6858.

Full text
Abstract:
Ce mémoire présente une étude de la morphologie de ce qui est généralement appelé le pluriel nominal du persan (parler de Téhéran) dans le cadre d’une théorie de la morphologie basée sur le mot : Whole Word Morphology, développée par Ford et Singh (1991). Ce modèle lexicaliste adopte une position plus forte que les modèles proposés par Aronoff (1976) et Anderson (1992) en n’admettant aucune opération morphologique sur des unités plus petites que le mot. Selon cette théorie, une description morphologique consiste en l’énumération des Stratégies de Formation de Mots (SFM), licencées chacunes par au moins deux paires de mots ayant la même covariation formelle et sémantique. Tous les SFM suit le même schéma. Nous avons répertorié 49 SFM regroupant les pluriels et les collectifs. Nous constatons qu’il est difficile de saisir le pluriel nominal du persan en tant que catégorie syntaxique et que les différentes « marques du pluriel » présentées dans la littérature ne constituent pas un ensemble homogène : elles partagent toutes un sens de pluralité qui cependant varie d’une interprétation référentielle à une interprétation collective non-référentielle. Cette étude vise la déscription de la compétence morphologique, ce qui ne dépend d’aucune considération extralinguistique. Nous argumentons notamment contre la dichotomie arabe/persan généralement admise dans la littérature. Nous avons également fourni des explications quant à la production des pluriels doubles et avons discuté de la variation supposée du fait d’un choix multiple de « marques du pluriel ».
This thesis presents a word-based study of what is generally called the nominal plural morphology of Persian (Tehrani dialect) within the framework of the Whole Word Morphology developed by Ford & Singh (1991). This lexicaliste model takes up a stronger position than that proposed by Aronoff (1976) and Anderson (1992), by not allowing any morphological operation on units smaller than the word. According to this theory a morphological description consist of the listing of the Word Formation Strategies (WFS), each licensed by at least two pairs of words having the same formal and semantic covariation. All WFS’s follow the same schema. We have listed 49 WFS’s of plurals and collectives. We note that it is difficult to understand the import of the plural nominal as a syntactic category in Persian and that different “marks of plural” presented in the literature do not make a homogeneous unity: they all share a plurality meaning but it varies from referential interpretation to collective and non-referential interpretation. This study’s aim is to describe the morphological competence, which does not depend on any extra-linguistic criteria. In particular, we argue against the generally admitted Arabic/Persian dichotomy. We also provide explanation with regards to the utterance of double plurals and to the variation assumed since more than one choice of “plural marks” are available.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dubé, Jaïmé. "L'incorporation nominale en innu et les mots en -Vche en français : deux études de morphologie basée sur le mot." Thèse, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/7931.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Word-based morphology"

1

1945-, Agnihotri Rama Kant, ed. Hindi morphology: A word-based description. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Knowles, Gerald. Word Class In Malay: Corpus-Based Approach. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Andrew, Hippisley, ed. Network morphology: A defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

1943-, Singh Rajendra, and Martohardjono Gita 1956-, eds. Pace Pānini: Towards a word-based theory of morphology. New York: P. Lang, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub., 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Blevins, James P. Word-Based Morphology from Aristotle to Modern WP (Word and Paradigm Models). Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0017.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ratcliffe, Robert R. Morphology. Edited by Jonathan Owens. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199764136.013.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
This article discusses the study of Arabic morphology. It first considers the root-and-pattern theory, which has become the orthodox approach to Arabic synchronic morphology. It then details the paradigm shift in the mid-1980s, when students of Arabic morphology reached the conclusion that a rigidly reductionist root-and-pattern analysis is fundamentally inadequate as a descriptive tool. This has led to a variety of alternative models, which can be loosely grouped under the rubric of word based or stem based. All such models have in common the idea that many or all morphological regularities in Arabic can be best described in terms of derivational processes operating on words or stems rather than in terms of combinations of roots and patterns.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Glanville, Peter John. Words, roots, and patterns. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198792734.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 2 establishes the semantic makeup of word meaning in general, dividing it into semantic structure and conceptual content. It familiarizes the reader with roots and patterns in Arabic morphology, investigating the semantic abstractions discernable in sets of words that share a root, in addition to the semantic structure shared by words formed in the same pattern. The chapter introduces the notion of shape-invariant morphology, arriving at an approach to Arabic morphology in which some derivation is rule-based, with operations being carried out directly on base words, whereas another type of derivation involves root extraction from a source word. Word patterns are created when a morphological operation is carried out on a base word with some regularity. Once the pattern exists, a variety of base words can be mapped to it by root extraction, creating a uniform output regardless of the shape of the input word.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gisborne, Nikolas, and Andrew Hippisley, eds. Defaults in Morphological Theory. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198712329.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Default-based analyses of linguistic data are most prevalent in morphological descriptions because morphology is pervaded by idiosyncrasy and irregularity, and defaults allow for a representation of the facts by construing regularity not as all or nothing but as a matter of degree. Defaults manifest themselves in a variety of ways in a group of morphological theories that have received much attention in the last few years, and whose main ideas and claims have been recently consolidated as important monographs. In May 2012 a workshop was convened at the University of Kentucky in Lexington to show-case default usage in four prominent theories of morphology. The presenters were key proponents of the theories, in most cases a theory’s author. The role of defaults was outlined in Construction Morphology, Network Morphology, Paradigm Function Morphology, and Word Grammar. With reference to these theories, as well as the lexical syntactic framework of HPSG, this book addresses questions about the role of defaults in the lexicon, including: (1) Does a defaults-based account of language have implications for the architecture of the grammar, particularly the proposal that morphology is an autonomous component? (2) How does a default differ from the canonical or prototypical in morphology? (3) Do defaults have a psychological basis? (4) How do defaults help us understand language as a sign-based system that is flawed, where the one to one association of form and meaning breaks down in the morphology?
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Woodbury, Anthony. Central Alaskan Yupik (Eskimo-Aleut). Edited by Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun, and Nicholas Evans. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.30.

Full text
Abstract:
This is a sketch of polysynthesis in Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY) based on the Cup’ik dialect of Chevak, Alaska. CAY has well-defined words whose content is often holophrastic and whose parts are often word-like. Holophrasis is achieved by a combination of rich inflectional suffixation and by a derivational morphology in which several hundred productive suffixes bearing different lexical and grammatical meanings and functions may be added, recursively, to a lexical base. Each suffix selects the category of its base, over which it normally has scope, and determines the category of the resultant base. This simple but prolific suffixation-based system, termed ‘morphological orthodoxy’, yields long, polysynthetic words. Three cases are then discussed where suffixal elements govern constructions that in one way or another stretch CAY’s orthodox morphology, motivating them by showing parallel constructions governed by elements with similar grammatical and semantic content in languages with more heterodox morphology and syntax.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Word-based morphology"

1

Blevins, James P. "Word-based declensions in Estonian." In Yearbook of Morphology, 1–25. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4066-0_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Janicki, Maciej. "A Multi-purpose Bayesian Model for Word-Based Morphology." In Systems and Frameworks for Computational Morphology, 104–23. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23980-4_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Schwarzwald, Ora. "8. Opacity in Hebrew word morphology." In Language Processing and Acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root-Based, Morphology, 147–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lald.28.08sch.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Goral, Mira, and Loraine K. Obler. "12. Root-morpheme processing during word recognition in Hebrew speakers across the adult life span." In Language Processing and Acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root-Based, Morphology, 223–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lald.28.12gor.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dalrymple, Mary, John J. Lowe, and Louise Mycock. "The interface to morphology." In The Oxford Reference Guide to Lexical Functional Grammar, 436–70. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198733300.003.0012.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines the place of morphology in the LFG architecture. The chapter assumes a modular view of the morphological component, in line with the overall modular architecture of LFG: the morphological component has its own internal structure and obeys universal and language particular constraints on word formation that need not be shared by other levels of structure. According to this model, the morphological component associates a word form with a set of features representing the morphological structure and grammatical contribution of the word; these features are interpreted at the interface of morphology with the rest of the grammar, producing the lexical entry for the word form. This view fits well with a realizational theory of morphology; the proposals are compatible not only with explicitly paradigm-based models, but with any morphological theory which relates words to feature sets encoding their grammatical properties and structure, including finite state theories of morphology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hacken, Pius Ten, and Renáta Panocová. "Word Formation, Borrowing and their Interaction." In The Interaction of Borrowing and Word Formation, 3–14. Edinburgh University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474448208.003.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Word formation and borrowing can both be used to create neologisms. Their interaction is a topic that has not been widely discussed, because they have generally been assigned to different domains of linguistics. The study of word formation is usually considered part of the domain of morphology, whereas the study of borrowing has been undertaken partly in lexicography and etymology, partly in sociolinguistics and language policy. Word formation and borrowing are both responses to naming needs. As such they can be in competition. The competition is quite unequal, however, because the two processes operate very differently. Whereas a borrowing is based on an individual expression (typically a word) from another language, word formation is based on the application of rules to existing lexical material. When we consider the origin of a particular word, it is not always straightforward to determine whether the word is the result of borrowing or word formation. In some cases, the two processes may in fact both be involved and the relative contribution of each may vary among speakers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Maiden, Martin. "The verbs ‘rain’ and ‘snow’ in Gallo-Romance, and other morphological mismatches in diachrony." In Variation and Change in Gallo-Romance Grammar, 385–402. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840176.003.0018.

Full text
Abstract:
The historical morphology of the verb ‘snow’ in Francoprovençal presents a conundrum, in that it is clearly analogically influenced by the verb ‘rain’, for obvious reasons of lexical semantic similarity, but the locus of that influence is not the ‘root’ (the ostensible bearer of lexical meaning) but desinential inflexion-class members, which are in principle independent of any lexical meaning. Similar morphological changes are also identified for other Gallo-Romance verbs. It seems, in effect, that speakers can identify exponents of the lexical meaning of word-forms in linear sequences larger than the apparent ‘morphemic’ composition of those word-forms, even when such a composition may seem prima facie transparent and obvious. It is argued that these facts are inherently incompatible with ‘constructivist’, morpheme-based, models of morphology, and strongly compatible with what have been called ‘abstractivist’ (‘word-and-paradigm’) approaches, which generally take entire word-forms as the primary units of morphological analysis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hacken, Pius ten, and Renáta Panocová. "Trends in the Interaction between Borrowing and Word Formation." In The Interaction of Borrowing and Word Formation, 281–92. Edinburgh University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474448208.003.0014.

Full text
Abstract:
Based on the case studies in this volume, we identify three central themes that reflect the interaction between borrowing and word formation. One is neoclassical word formation. Based on the reanalysis of borrowed words, a new system may emerge, but whether it actually does, depends on the language. A second is internationalisms. Their reanalysis may lead to new word formation rules which show a strong cross-linguistic resemblance. A third theme is anglicisms. Most contemporary borrowings in languages other than English are from English. In some languages, the resistance to anglicisms has led to an increased use of word formation rules to replace them. Two other topics addressed in several of the case studies are the interaction of analogy with compound formation and the need to adapt borrowings to the morphology of the borrowing language by means of word markers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Svantesson, Jan-Olof. "Khalkha Mongolian." In The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages, 334–49. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.003.0022.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter gives an introduction to the basic structures of Khalkha Mongolian, most of which are similar to those of Mongolian proper in general. Segmental phonology (vowels and consonants) and word structure are analyzed. Major changes from earlier stages of the language are described briefly, as is the writing system, based on the Cyrillic alphabet. Vowel harmony, based on pharyngeality (ATR) and rounding, has several interesting properties, including the opacity of high rounded vowels to rounding harmony. There is a rich derivational and inflectional morphology based on suffixes. Basic syntactic structures, including word order and case marking of arguments in simple and complex clauses, are described, as are the functions of different verb forms (finite verbs, converbs, and participles). The description emphasizes the central place of Mongolian proper in the typology of the Transeurasian languages.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Jackendoff, Ray, and Jenny Audring. "Language processing and language acquisition through the lens of Relational Morphology." In The Texture of the Lexicon, 201–32. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827900.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter asks what is happening to linguistic representations during language use, and how representations are formed in the course of language acquisition. It is shown how Relational Morphology’s theory of representations can be directly embedded into models of processing and acquisition. Central is that the lexicon, complete with schemas and relational links, constitutes the long-term memory network that supports language production and comprehension. The chapter first discusses processing: the nature of working memory; promiscuous (opportunistic) processing; spreading activation; priming; probabilistic parsing; the balance between storage and computation in recognizing morphologically complex words; and the role of relational links and schemas in word retrieval. It then turns to acquisition, which is to be thought of as adding nodes and relational links to the lexical network. The general approach is based on the Propose but Verify procedure of Trueswell et al. (2013), plus conservative generalization, as in usage-based approaches.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Word-based morphology"

1

Lin, Xiaojun, Liang Zhao, Meng Zhang, and Xihong Wu. "A morphology-based Chinese word segmentation method." In 2010 International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering (NLP-KE). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/nlpke.2010.5587786.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ying Wang and Zhong Liu. "Word association learning system based on vocabulary morphology network." In 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icacte.2010.5579038.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Sak, Hasim, Murat Saraclar, and Tunga Gungor. "Morphology-based and sub-word language modeling for Turkish speech recognition." In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2010. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icassp.2010.5494927.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cardenas, Ronald, Claudia Borg, and Daniel Zeman. "CUNI–Malta system at SIGMORPHON 2019 Shared Task on Morphological Analysis and Lemmatization in context: Operation-based word formation." In Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/w19-4213.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Galochkina, Tatiana. "Word formative structure of words with the root lěp- in Old Russian written records." In 6th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.06.10121g.

Full text
Abstract:
System of derivational morphology of the Old Russian language has its own characteristics based on the origin of the book vocabulary, which consisted mainly of Proto-Slavic words and calques from Greek words. The main morphological way of word formation was the heritage of the Proto-Slavic language, which developed together with the formation of morphemes as a language unit. Active derivation took place during the formation of the Old Russian book vocabulary. During this period an uninterrupted process began the creation of book translations from the Greek into Church Slavonic. The ancient scribes made extensive use of Greek words calquing, which especially intensified the creation of compound words. Compound words were formed according to the models of Greek composites, but using Russian morphemes. As a result of this process, the lexical fund of the literary language was created, which included words with the root *lěp-. Such words are contained in ancient Russian written records (“Life of St. Sava the Sanctified”, composed by St. Cyril Skifopolsky, “The Life of St. Andrew the Fool”, “The Chronicle” by John Malalas, “The Chronicle” by George Amartol, “History of the Jewish War” by Josephus Flavius, Christianopolis (Acts and Epistles of the Apostles), Uspensky Сollection of XII–XIII centuries etc.). In the article will be considered the word formative structure of words with the root lěp-.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Galochkina, Tatiana. "Word formative structure of words with the root lěp- in Old Russian written records." In 6th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.06.10121g.

Full text
Abstract:
System of derivational morphology of the Old Russian language has its own characteristics based on the origin of the book vocabulary, which consisted mainly of Proto-Slavic words and calques from Greek words. The main morphological way of word formation was the heritage of the Proto-Slavic language, which developed together with the formation of morphemes as a language unit. Active derivation took place during the formation of the Old Russian book vocabulary. During this period an uninterrupted process began the creation of book translations from the Greek into Church Slavonic. The ancient scribes made extensive use of Greek words calquing, which especially intensified the creation of compound words. Compound words were formed according to the models of Greek composites, but using Russian morphemes. As a result of this process, the lexical fund of the literary language was created, which included words with the root *lěp-. Such words are contained in ancient Russian written records (“Life of St. Sava the Sanctified”, composed by St. Cyril Skifopolsky, “The Life of St. Andrew the Fool”, “The Chronicle” by John Malalas, “The Chronicle” by George Amartol, “History of the Jewish War” by Josephus Flavius, Christianopolis (Acts and Epistles of the Apostles), Uspensky Сollection of XII–XIII centuries etc.). In the article will be considered the word formative structure of words with the root lěp-.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Piperski, A. Ch. "RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AND CORPUS DIVERSITY." In International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies "Dialogue". Russian State University for the Humanities, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2075-7182-2020-19-615-627.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper discusses the use of most widely-known Russian corpora, namely Russian National Corpus, ruTenTen, General Internet Corpus of Russian, and Araneum Russicum Maximum, for the theoretical study of Russian language. Based on a sample of papers from 2019, I demonstrate that scholars, especially theoretical linguists, tend to ignore the opportunities provided by a wide range of Web corpora, even though these resources are well-known to the NLP community. I present a selection of case studies to show that data from “non-classical” corpora can be used for studying various linguistic phenomena, such as: 1) variation in morphology and syntax; 2) word formation and lexical change; 3) construction grammar. I also claim that the underuse of non-classical corpora is partly due to the fact that they are (perceived as) not quite user-friendly.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Word-based morphology' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography