Journal articles: 'Wound assessment'

1

Hulme, Charlotte. "Wound assessment." Nursing Standard 20, no. 31 (April 12, 2006): 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.20.31.67.s58.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Bennet, Gary, and Edward J. Dickenson. "Wound assessment." Nursing Older People 7, no. 4 (August 1, 1995): 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nop.7.4.34.s14.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Grey, Joseph E., Stuart Enoch, and Keith G. Harding. "Wound assessment." BMJ 332, no. 7536 (February 2, 2006): 285–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7536.285.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Young, Stephen. "Wound assessment." British Journal of Community Nursing 24, Sup9 (September 1, 2019): S5. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2019.24.sup9.s5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Brennan, Mary R. "Wound assessment." Nursing 49, no. 8 (August 2019): 62–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.nurse.0000559936.42877.4a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Spear, Marcia. "Wound Assessment." Plastic Surgical Nursing 29, no. 2 (April 2009): 128–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.psn.0000356873.48714.35.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Cook, Leanne. "Wound Assessment." British Journal of Nursing 21, Sup20 (November 7, 2012): 4–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2012.21.sup20.4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Cook, Leanne. "Wound Assessment." British Journal of Nursing 21, Sup20a (November 7, 2012): 4–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2012.21.sup20a.4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

DOUGHTY, DOROTHY B. "Wound Assessment." Home Healthcare Nurse: The Journal for the Home Care and Hospice Professional 22, no. 3 (March 2004): 192–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004045-200403000-00014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

BOLTON, LAURA. "WOUND ASSESSMENT." Nursing 20, no. 4 (April 1990): 92–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00152193-199004000-00027.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Shamsian, Negin. "Wound Expo 2021 highlights: wound assessment." British Journal of Nursing 30, Sup20 (November 2, 2021): S48. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.sup20.s48.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Enoch, Stuart. "ABC of wound healing: Wound assessment." BMJ 332, Suppl S3 (March 1, 2006): 060398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.060398.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Bates-Jensen, Barbara M. "CHRONIC WOUND ASSESSMENT." Nursing Clinics of North America 34, no. 4 (December 1999): 799–845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0029-6465(22)02424-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Banks, V. "Wound assessment methods." Journal of Wound Care 7, no. 4 (April 2, 1998): 211–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/jowc.1998.7.4.211.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

St-Supery, Véronique, Youssef Tahiri, John Sampalis, Jean-Paul Brutus, Patrick G. Harris, and Andreas Nikolis. "Wound Healing Assessment." Annals of Plastic Surgery 67, no. 2 (August 2011): 193–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/sap.0b013e3181f3e0e8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Andrews, Hilary. "Wound care checklists—role and wound assessment." British Journal of Healthcare Assistants 7, no. 1 (January 2013): 8–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjha.2013.7.1.8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

SCHEIBEL, JENS H., MOGENS LYKKEGAARD NIELSEN, and SVEND LINDENBERG. "ASSESSMENT OF WOUND CONTAMINATION BY WOUND IRRIGATION." Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section B Microbiology 86B, no. 1-6 (August 15, 2009): 201–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1978.tb00032.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Chakraborty, Chinmay, Bharat Gupta, and Soumya K. Ghosh. "Tele-wound technology network for assessment of chronic wounds." International Journal of Telemedicine and Clinical Practices 1, no. 4 (2016): 345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijtmcp.2016.078430.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Adil, Dehhaze, Labbaci Rim, Daghouri Nada-Imane, Taybi Otmane, Diher Issam, and Ahmar-Rass Nour El Imane. "FACIAL WOUND ASSESSMENT KIT." International Journal of Advanced Research 9, no. 10 (October 31, 2021): 786–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/13611.

Full text

Abstract:

Facial wounds are a frequent reason for emergency room visits. The goals of laceration repair are to achieve hemostasis, avoid infection, restore function to the involved tissues, and achieve optimal cosmetic results with minimal scarring. Therefore, these cases are most appropriately managed by plastic surgeons who have a thorough knowledge of anatomy, aesthetic sense, and meticulous expertise in atraumatic tissue manipulation, combined with the surgical skill to repair any structure. You need to know what to do and what not to do : whether to suture or leave open. What local anesthesia to use and how. What equipment to use (and have it available beforehand). Whether to give antibiotic therapy and what kind. How to avoid aesthetic or functional after-effects. Which dressing to use depending on the state of the wound. This article will serve as an aid to wound management and review repair techniques for high-risk areas of the face.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Simmons, Jessica. "Wound Healing and Assessment." Journal of the Dermatology Nurses' Association 14, no. 5 (September 2022): 197–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jdn.0000000000000704.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

O'Dwyer, Louise. "Wound assessment and management." Veterinary Nursing Journal 20, no. 8 (August 2005): 15–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17415349.2005.11013385.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Benbow, Maureen. "Parameters of wound assessment." British Journal of Nursing 4, no. 11 (June 8, 1995): 647–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjon.1995.4.11.647.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Rice, Robyn. "Wound Assessment and Documentation." Home Healthcare Nurse: The Journal for the Home Care and Hospice Professional 13, no. 2 (March 1995): 75–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004045-199503000-00013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Bellamy, K. "Photography in wound assessment." Journal of Wound Care 4, no. 7 (July 2, 1995): 313–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/jowc.1995.4.7.313.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

FARREN, MARY, and YANICK MARTELLY-KEBREAU. "Wound Assessment & Management." Home Healthcare Nurse: The Journal for the Home Care and Hospice Professional 29, no. 4 (April 2011): 233–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nhh.0b013e3182119720.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

&NA;. "Wound Assessment & Management." Home Healthcare Nurse: The Journal for the Home Care and Hospice Professional 29, no. 4 (April 2011): 245–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nhh.0b013e318215cf9b.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Young, Trudie. "Wound assessment and documentation." Practice Nursing 8, no. 13 (August 1997): 27–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/pnur.1997.8.13.27.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Miller, Mick. "Principles of wound assessment." Emergency Nurse 3, no. 1 (May 1995): 16–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/en.3.1.16.s5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Clancy, John, Andrew McVicar, and Damian Muncaster. "The Physiology of Wound Healing and Wound Assessment." British Journal of Perioperative Nursing (United Kingdom) 11, no. 8 (August 2001): 362–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/175045890101100805.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Jones, Menna Lloyd. "Wound healing Series 2.4, Part 1. Wound assessment." British Journal of Healthcare Assistants 11, no. 10 (October 2, 2017): 479–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjha.2017.11.10.479.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Van Dillen, Christine, Salvatore Silvestri, Marisa Haney, George Ralls, Christian Zuver, Dave Freeman, Lissa Diaz, and Linda Papa. "Evaluation of an off-the-shelf mobile telemedicine model in emergency department wound assessment and management." Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 19, no. 2 (February 2013): 84–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357633x13476231.

Full text

Abstract:

We examined the agreement between a videoconference-based evaluation and a bedside evaluation in the management of acute traumatic wounds in an emergency department. Adult and paediatric patients with acute wounds of various severities to the face, trunk and/or extremities presenting to the emergency department within 24 hours of injury were enrolled. Research assistants transmitted video images of the wound to an emergency physician using a laptop computer. The physician completed a standard wound assessment form before conducting a bedside evaluation and then completing a second assessment form. The primary outcome measure was wound length and depth. We also assessed management decision-making. A total of 173 wounds were evaluated. The correlation coefficient between video and bedside assessments was 0.96 for wound length. The mean difference between the lengths was 0.02 cm (SD 0.91). Management of the wound would have been the same in 94% of cases. The agreement on wound characteristics and wound management ranged from 84-100%. The highest correlation was 0.92 in suture material used and the lowest correlation was 0.64 in wound type. The ability of video images to distinguish between a minor and non-minor wound, and predicting the need for hospital management, had high degrees of sensitivity and specificity. The study showed that wound characteristics and management decisions appear to correlate well between video and bedside evaluations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Mohammed, Heba Tallah, Robert L. Bartlett, Deborah Babb, Robert D. J. Fraser, and David Mannion. "A time motion study of manual versus artificial intelligence methods for wound assessment." PLOS ONE 17, no. 7 (July 28, 2022): e0271742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271742.

Full text

Abstract:

Objectives This time-motion study explored the amount of time clinicians spent on wound assessments in a real-world environment using wound assessment digital application utilizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) vs. manual methods. The study also aimed at comparing the proportion of captured quality wound images on the first attempt by the assessment method. Methods Clinicians practicing at Valley Wound Center who agreed to join the study were asked to record the time needed to complete wound assessment activities for patients with active wounds referred for a routine evaluation on the follow-up days at the clinic. Assessment activities included: labelling wounds, capturing images, measuring wounds, calculating surface areas, and transferring data into the patient’s record. Results A total of 91 patients with 115 wounds were assessed. The average time to capture and access wound image with the AI digital tool was significantly faster than a standard digital camera with an average of 62 seconds (P<0.001). The digital application was significantly faster by 77% at accurately measuring and calculating the wound surface area with an average of 45.05 seconds (P<0.001). Overall, the average time to complete a wound assessment using Swift was significantly faster by 79%. Using the AI application, the staff completed all steps in about half of the time (54%) normally spent on manual wound evaluation activities. Moreover, acquiring acceptable wound image was significantly more likely to be achieved the first time using the digital tool than the manual methods (92.2% vs. 75.7%, P<0.004). Conclusions Using the digital assessment tool saved significant time for clinicians in assessing wounds. It also successfully captured quality wound images at the first attempt.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Benbow, Maureen. "Best practice in wound assessment." Nursing Standard 30, no. 27 (March 2, 2016): 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.27.40.s45.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Carroll, Ronan, and Laura Johnson. "Using a wound assessment chart." Nursing Standard 5, no. 19 (January 30, 1991): 8–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.5.19.8.s68.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Tracey. "Wound care and pain assessment." Nursing Standard 24, no. 24 (February 17, 2010): 51–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.24.24.51.s54.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

DAVIDSON, MARSHA. "Sharpen your wound assessment skills." Nursing 32, no. 10 (October 2002): 32hn1–32hn4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00152193-200210000-00019.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Baranoski, Sharon, and Elizabeth A. Ayello. "Using a wound assessment form." Nursing 35, no. 3 (March 2005): 14–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00152193-200503000-00008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Harris, Connie, Barbara Bates-Jensen, Nancy Parslow, Rose Raizman, Mina Singh, and Robert Ketchen. "Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool." Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 37, no. 3 (May 2010): 253–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/won.0b013e3181d73aab.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Bianco, Maria, and Clare Williams. "Using photography in wound assessment." Practice Nursing 13, no. 11 (November 2002): 505–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2002.13.11.10844.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Doughty, Dorothy B. "Wound Assessment: Tips and Techniques." Advances in Skin & Wound Care 17, no. 7 (September 2004): 369–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00129334-200409000-00017.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

&NA;. "Elements of a Wound Assessment." Advances in Skin & Wound Care 17, no. 9 (November 2004): 461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00129334-200411000-00009.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Krupp, S., M. Baechler, and J. Bille. "Assessment of burn wound sepsis." Journal of Hospital Infection 6 (March 1985): 133–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0195-6701(85)80059-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Bloemen, M. C. T., P. P. M. van Zuijlen, and E. Middelkoop. "Reliability of subjective wound assessment." Burns 37, no. 4 (June 2011): 566–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.02.004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

FORREST, RICHARD D., and POVL GAMBORG-NIELSEN. "Wound Assessment in Clinical Practice." Acta Medica Scandinavica 216, S687 (April 24, 2009): 69–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb08743.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Ousey, Karen, and Leanne Cook. "Unit 1. Holistic wound assessment." Practice Nursing 22, no. 11 (November 2011): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2011.22.11.cpd1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Young, Trudie. "Wound infection assessment and management." Nursing and Residential Care 13, no. 8 (August 2011): 384–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/nrec.2011.13.8.384.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Lozano-Platonoff, Adriana, Melissa Desireé Florida Mejía-Mendoza, Mónica Ibáñez-Doria, and José Contreras-Ruiz. "Assessment: Cornerstone in Wound Management." Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221, no. 2 (August 2015): 611–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.025.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Jones, Menna Lloyd. "Wound healing Series 2.4, Part 3. Wound assessment in practice." British Journal of Healthcare Assistants 12, no. 1 (January 2, 2018): 14–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjha.2018.12.1.14.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Körber, A., E. Cesko, and J. Dissemond. "Visual wound-assessment by population groups with different educational backgrounds." Phlebologie 38, no. 05 (2009): 219–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1622276.

Full text

Abstract:

SummaryThe documentation of chronic wounds is presently carried out by a number of different occupational groups, partly with considerable differences in knowledge. Besides testing the quality of judgement, the aim of our clinical study was therefore also to test the reproducibility of the visual wound assessment by population groups with different educational backgrounds. Participants, material, methods: The subjects, belonging to population groups; experts, doctors, nursing services, hospital nursing staff and laities, were required to assess all relevant parameters of wound assessment at two different points in time. A newly developed digital, colorimetric wound documentation system was used as an objective reference. Results: The wound assessment was evaluated both intra-individually as well as inter-individually. A noticeably better quality of assessment of objective parameters, such as length, breadth, surface, wound stage and wound infection, was shown by the population groups with previous experience, both in the single and two phase analysis. The wound coating assessments of all population groups were equally inaccurate at both points in time. Conclusion: Consequently, it may be concluded that it is not possible to attain sufficient, reliable and adequate wound documentation without technical aids, for example a digital photo documentation. Especially the assessment of the wound surface and coating is of an insufficient standard, whether carried out at a specific point in time or in a sequence.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Kitamura, Aya, Takeo Minematsu, Gojiro Nakagami, and Hiromi Sanada. "Assessment of histopathology of wounds based on protein distribution detected by wound blotting." SAGE Open Medicine 6 (January 2018): 205031211881222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118812220.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Shortening the duration of healing based on an accurate assessment is important in pressure ulcer management. This study focused on the peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase activity detected by wound blotting, a non-invasive method of collecting wound exudate, to establish a non-invasive and point-of-care assessment method for analyzing the histopathology of wounds using an animal model. Methods: Wounds were created on the dorsal skin of rats. Peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase activities in the wound exudate were detected by wound blotting on post-wounding days 1, 4, 7, and 10. Wound tissue was collected on the same sampling days. Peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase activity within the tissue and myeloperoxidase were visualized. Two types of peroxidase activities were detected by wound blotting: ring and non-ring signals. The histopathological features were compared between wounds with ring and non-ring signals. Results: The wounds with ring signals showed a high level of peroxidase activity, and histological analysis demonstrated that the secreted or deviated peroxidase activity originated from myeloperoxidase, indicating a strong inflammation reaction within the tissue. The histopathology of wounds related to the alkaline phosphatase signals was not identified. Conclusion: The results suggested that ring signals indicated a strong inflammatory reaction and that they could be used to assess non-visible inflammation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Wound assessment'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles