Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Classical Arabic linguists / Книги

Книги з теми "Classical Arabic linguists"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Classical Arabic linguists.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 15 вересня 2021

Оновлено: 1 лютого 2022

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-35 книг для дослідження на тему "Classical Arabic linguists".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте книги для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

ʻAbd al-Munʻim Muḥammad al-Ḥasan Kārūrī. The inflectional morphology of verb in classical Arabic: A formalized application of the WP linguistic model. Khartoum: Khartoum University Press, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Holes, Clive, ed. Arabic Historical Dialectology. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198701378.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This book, by a group of leading international scholars, outlines the history of the spoken dialects of Arabic from the Arab conquests of the seventh century up to the present day. It specifically investigates the evolution of Arabic as a spoken language, in contrast to the many existing studies that focus on written Classical or Modern Standard Arabic. The volume begins with a discursive introduction that deals with important issues in the general scholarly context, including the indigenous myth and probable reality of the history of Arabic; Arabic dialect geography and typology; types of internally and externally motivated linguistic change; social indexicalization; and pidginization and creolization in Arabic-speaking communities. Most chapters then focus on developments in a specific region—Mauritania, the Maghreb, Egypt, the Levant, the Northern Fertile Crescent, the Gulf, and South Arabia—with one exploring Judaeo-Arabic, a group of varieties historically spread over a wider area. The remaining two chapters in the volume examine individual linguistic features of particular historical interest and controversy, specifically the origin and evolution of the b- verbal prefix, and the adnominal linker –an/–in. The volume will be of interest to scholars and students of the linguistic and social history of Arabic as well as to comparative linguists interested in topics such as linguistic typology and language change.

3

Khan, Geoffrey. Judaeo-Arabic and Judaeo-Persian. Edited by Martin Goodman. Oxford University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199280322.013.0024.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The term ‘Judaeo-Arabic’ refers to a type of Arabic that was used by Jews and was distinct in some way from other types of Arabic. The Arabic language was used by Jews in Arabia before the rise of Islam. From the point of view of linguistic form, the following characteristic features of written Judaeo-Arabic can be identified: it is written in Hebrew script; it exhibits deviations from Classical Arabic; and it contains Hebrew and Aramaic elements. ‘Judaeo-Persian’ refers to Persian used by Jews. Like Judaeo-Arabic, Judaeo-Persian is not a uniform linguistic entity. The term is used to refer to both a written and a spoken form of language. The geographical area in which it was used extended beyond the boundaries of Iran and included Afghanistan, part of the Caucasus, and much of Central Asia. Judaeo-Persian in its written form is represented in Hebrew script.

4

Suleiman, Yasir. Arabic Folk Linguistics. Edited by Jonathan Owens. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199764136.013.0011.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article addresses some long-standing issues in Arabic sociolinguistics. The starting point is the concept of diglossia, which has become the port of entry for any discussion of the semiliquid language situation in the Arabic-speaking world. It first outlines the most abiding criticisms against diglossia and then offers thoughts on these as a prelude to discussing Arabic folk linguistics. It is argued that a folk linguistic perspective should be incorporated in studying Arabic in the social world. This perspective is important in developing an insider understanding of the language that may be at odds with the findings of modern linguistics. To aid the process of developing this perspective, the article adopts the terminology and conceptual frameworks Arabic speakers use in describing their language situation wherever possible—hence, the choice of fusha and ‘ammiyya instead of any of their translations into English, including Classical Arabic and vernacular, which Haeri uses.

5

Kinberg. Studies in the Linguistic Structure of Classical Arabic. Edited by Kinberg and Versteegh. BRILL, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789047400486.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Kinberg, L., K. Versteegh, and N. Kinberg. Studies in the Linguistic Structure of Classical Arabic. BRILL, 2001.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Versteegh, C. H. M., and Naphtali Kinberg. Studies in the Linguistic Structure of Classical Arabic (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics). Brill Academic Publishers, 2000.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Sara, Solomon. The Classical Arabic Lexicographical Tradition. Edited by Jonathan Owens. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199764136.013.0023.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article discusses three basic paradigmatic models that Arabic lexicographers adopted over time: (I) al-Khaliil’s model in Kitaab al-ʕayn; (II) al-Jawharii’s model in alhaah; and (III) al-Bustaanii’s model in Kitaab muħiiṭ al-muħiiṭ. Though the three approaches are procedurally opposed, all account for the lexical data of Arabic, offer justifiable procedures of how to account for the complexity of the data, and are maximally different from each other. The article presents a biographical sketch of these selected lexicographers, followed by a discussion of the design and composition of their dictionaries and where they fit in the historical flow of Arabic linguistic activity of their time.

9

Bateson, Mary Catherine. Arabic Language Handbook (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

A Dictionary of Iraqi Arabic: English, Arabic/Arabic, English (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

(Editor), Karl Stowasser, and Moukhtar Ani (Editor), eds. A Dictionary of Syrian Arabic: English-Arabic (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Owens, Jonathan. History. Edited by Jonathan Owens. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199764136.013.0020.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article discusses the history of the Arabic language. It argues that Arabic should have a privileged place within historical linguistics. It is one of the few languages in the world for which a wealth of data exists both in the far-flung contemporary Arabic-speaking world and in a rich Classical tradition attested beginning 1400 years ago. Issues of maintenance and change, central concepts in historical linguistics, can be interpreted against a rich set of data. That they have not resides in the fact that basic concepts of historical linguistics have rarely been systematically applied to the language. Doing so will not only open new vistas to understanding the rich linguistic history of the language but also promises to contribute to the general study of historical linguistics.

13

Ryding, Karin, and David Wilmsen, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108277327.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Arabic linguistics encompasses a range of language forms and functions from formal to informal, classical to contemporary, written to spoken, all of which have vastly different research traditions. Recently however, the increasing prominence of new methodologies such as corpus linguistics and sociolinguistics have allowed Arabic linguistics to be studied from multiple perspectives, revealing key discoveries about the nature of Arabic-in-use and deeper knowledge of traditional fields of study. With contributions from internationally renowned experts on the language, this handbook provides a state-of-the-art overview of both traditional and modern topics in Arabic linguistics. Chapters are divided into six thematic areas: applied Arabic linguistics, variation and sociolinguistics, theoretical studies, computational and corpus linguistics, new media studies and Arabic linguistics in literature and translation. It is an essential resource for students and researchers wishing to explore the exciting and rapidly moving field of Arabic linguistics.

14

Rice, Frank S., Majed F. Sa'Id, and Majed F. Said. Eastern Arabic with MP3 Files (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2005.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Holes, Clive. Modern Arabic: Structures, Functions, and Varieties (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Abu-Talib, Mohammed, William S. Carroll, and Richard S. Harrell. A Basic Course in Moroccan Arabic (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Abu-Talib, Mohammed, William S. Carroll, and Richard Harrell. A Basic Course in Moroccan Arabic (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Erwin, Wallace M. A BASIC COURSE IN IRAQI ARABIC (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). 3rd ed. Georgetown University Press, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Daniels, Peter. The Arabic Writing System. Edited by Jonathan Owens. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199764136.013.0018.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article discusses the Arabic writing system. It begins with linguistic description of the components of Classical and Modern Standard Arabic writing, followed by accounts of their use to represent the language and of the use of the script as art and in technology. The article concludes with summaries of both the past and prospects of the script.

20

Harrell, Richard S. A SHORT REFERENCE GRAMMAR OF MOROCCAN ARABIC (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Erwin, Wallace M. A Short Reference Grammar of Iraqi Arabic (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Khan, Geoffrey. Judaeo-Arabic. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198701378.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The term ‘Judaeo-Arabic’ refers to a type of Arabic that was used by Jews and was distinct in some way from other types of Arabic. It is by no means a uniform linguistic entity and the term is used to refer to both written forms of Arabic and also spoken dialects. The first section of the chapter examines the various forms of written Judaeo-Arabic and their importance for the history of Middle Arabic and Arabic dialects. A classification of written texts into three broad periods may be made: these periods being Early Judaeo-Arabic, Classical Judaeo-Arabic, and Late Judaeo-Arabic. The second section of the chapter gives an overview of the Arabic dialects spoken by Jewish communities in the Middle East. Most of these dialects differ in some way from the dialects spoken by their Muslim and Christian neighbours. They are far more diverse in their structure than the various literary forms of Judaeo-Arabic.

23

Zaiback, Abdelnour, and Karin C. Ryding. Formal Spoken Arabic Fast Course: With MP3 Files (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). 3rd ed. Georgetown University Press, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Cowell, Mark W. Audio CD for A Reference Grammar of Syrian Arabic (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Stetkevych, Jaroslav. The Modern Arabic Literary Language: Lexical And Stylistic Developments (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

(Editor), Richard S. Harrell, Harvey Sobelman (Editor), and Thomas Fox (Editor), eds. A Dictionary of Moroccan Arabic: Moroccan-English & English-Moroccan (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Embarki, Mohamed. Phonetics. Edited by Jonathan Owens. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199764136.013.0002.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Phonetics is a linguistic field that studies speech in terms of production, transmission, and reception. The three domains of speech study the speaker (production), the hearer (reception), and what takes place between the two (transmission). To this purpose, phoneticians use methods derived from the science of physiology for production, from physics for transmission, and from psychology for reception. In this article, the first section deals with the principal phonetic descriptions of the Arab system produced by the early Arab grammarians of the classical period (2nd/8th––5th/11th). The second section presents the consonant and vowel systems of modern Arabic. The third section deals with the contribution of experimental phonetics to the specificities of the consonant and vowel Arabic systems focusing in particular on (1) pharyngeal consonants; (2) pharyngealized consonants; (3) temporal aspects (vocalic and gemination quantity); and (4) consonant and vowel variation.

28

Ferrando, Ignacio. The adnominal linker -an in Andalusi Arabic, with special reference to the poetry of Ibn Quzmān (twelfth century). Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198701378.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This chapter describes a syntactical structure typical of Andalusi Arabic, as well as many other Arabic varieties: the use of a nominal suffix -an/-in after an indefinite noun followed by a modifier. Some scholars have linked this morpheme to the so-called tanwīn (‘nunation’), the morpheme of indefiniteness of Classical Arabic. However, both the synchronic analysis of the linguistic facts as they appear in the Andalusi corpus explored in this chapter (the poetry of Ibn Quzmān, twelfth century) and the use of this suffix in other Arabic dialects suggest a different function. The adnominal linker represents not an indefiniteness morpheme or the remains of the tanwīn of Classical Arabic, but a syntactic connection between the indefinite noun and its modifier. It was not a sporadic, stylistic, or optional trait, but a specific and almost compulsory feature widespread in Andalusi Arabic sources, at least until the thirteenth century.

29

Omar, Margaret K. The Acquisition of Egyptian Arabic As a Native Language (Georgetown University Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Abu-Talib, Mohammed, William S. Carroll, and Richard S. Harrell. A Basic Course in Moroccan Arabic MP3 Files: Audio Exercises (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2005.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

El Shamsy, Ahmed. Rediscovering the Islamic Classics. Princeton University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691174563.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Islamic book culture dates back to late antiquity, when Muslim scholars began to write down their doctrines on parchment, papyrus, and paper and then to compose increasingly elaborate analyses of, and commentaries on, these ideas. Movable type was adopted in the Middle East only in the early nineteenth century, and it wasn't until the second half of the century that the first works of classical Islamic religious scholarship were printed there. But from that moment on, as this book reveals, the technology of print transformed Islamic scholarship and Arabic literature. The book tells the story of how a small group of editors and intellectuals brought forgotten works of Islamic literature into print and defined what became the classical canon of Islamic thought. Through the lens of the literary culture of nineteenth- and twentieth-century Arab cities—especially Cairo, a hot spot of the nascent publishing business—the book explores the contributions of these individuals, who included some of the most important thinkers of the time. Through their efforts to find and publish classical literature, the book shows, many nearly lost works were recovered, disseminated, and harnessed for agendas of linguistic, ethical, and religious reform. The book is an examination of the central role printing and its advocates played in the intellectual history of the modern Arab world.

32

Moussa, Mahmoud Sami. Dictionary of Idiomatic Expressions in Written Arabic: For the Reader of Classical and Modern Texts. American University in Cairo Press, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Cowell, Mark W. A Reference Grammar Of Syrian Arabic: With Audio CD (Based on the dialect of Damascus) (Georgetown Classics in Arabic Language and Linguistics). Georgetown University Press, 2005.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Talmon, Rafael. Eighth-Century Iraqi Grammar: A Critical Exploration of Pre-Halilian Arabic Linguistics (Harvard Semitic Museum Publications). Eisenbrauns, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Ready, Jonathan L. The Homeric Simile in Comparative Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198802556.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The Homeric Simile in Comparative Perspectives: Oral Traditions from Saudi Arabia to Indonesia investigates both the construction of the Homeric simile and the performance of Homeric poetry from neglected comparative perspectives. The first part considers similes in five modern oral poetries—Rajasthani epic, South Sumatran epic, Kyrgyz epic, Bosniac epic, and Najdi lyric poems from Saudi Arabia—and studies successful performances by still other verbal artists, such as Egyptian singers of epic, Turkish minstrels, and Chinese storytellers. In applying these findings to the Homeric epics, the second part offers a new take on how the Homeric poets put together their similes and alters our understanding of how the poets displayed their competence as performers of verbal art. Engaging intensively with a diverse array of scholarship from outside the field of classics, from folkloristics to cognitive linguistics, this book changes how we view not only a central feature of Homeric poetry but also the very nature of Homeric performance.