Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Common wheat / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Common wheat.

Journal articles on the topic 'Common wheat'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 26 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Common wheat.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Dumalasová, V., and P. Bartoš. "Reaction of wheat, alternative wheat and triticale cultivars to common bunt." Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 46, No. 1 (2010): 14–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/73/2009-cjgpb.

Full text

Abstract:

&nbsp;Seventeen winter wheat cultivars registered in the Czech Republic were tested for reaction to common bunt in 2&ndash;3 year field trials. Bunt infection of resistant checks Globus and Bill varied between 4.1% and 10.6%; the highest infection in cv. Pitbull reached 85.9%. Of the recently registered cultivars Nikol has a relatively low bunt incidence (26.9%). In addition to bread wheat seventeen triticale, seven durum wheat cultivars, two spelt wheat cultivars and one emmer wheat cultivar were tested in the field and some of them also in the greenhouse. Bunt infection of durum whea

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Pospisil, A., J. Benada, and I. Polisenská. "Variability of resistance to common bunt of wheat." Plant Protection Science 35, No. 1 (1999): 26–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/9670-pps.

Full text

Abstract:

During 1997–1998, the reaction of the collections of winter and spring wheat varieties to Tilletia caries was determined. In both years the most diseased winter varieties were Simona and Sparta, the least diseased were Samara and Ilona. High variability in the level of infection was observed in some varieties (VIada, Estica, Regina, Vega). No winter wheat variety was completely resistant. The most diseased spring wheat variety was Alexandria in both years, while Grandur showed no infection. High variability in the level of infection was observed in the special trials with cv. Ina and Contra. I

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Rajkovic, S., та N. Dolovac. "Common bunt (Tilletia tritici) in diﬀerent wheat genotypes". Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 42, Special Issue (2012): 16–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/6224-cjgpb.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Xudoyqulov, Asliddin To'raqul o'g'li Bozorov Abdullo Chori o'g'li. "COMMON DISEASES OF WHEAT AND THEIR CONTROL METHODS." INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE 1, no. 15 (2022): 51–53. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7234526.

Full text

Abstract:

Agricultural workers know very well how difficult it is to protect grain crops from various diseases. Rust alone damages 5% of wheat per year, and more than 1% from bunt damage. In order to increase productivity, it is necessary to significantly reduce these diseases and pests. This article discusses how to recognize the symptoms of wheat lesions and what can be done to protect wheat.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

He and G. R. Hughes, C. "Inheritance of resistance to common bunt in spelt and common wheat." Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, no. 1 (2003): 47–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/p01-167.

Full text

Abstract:

Common bunt causes yield loss and reduces grain quality in both common and durum wheats in western Canada. Since the most cost-effective method of control is the use of host resistance, this study was conducted to provide information on the genetic control of bunt resistance in three potentially new sources: common wheat cultivar Triple Dirk and spelt wheat cultivars RL5407 and SK0263. The segregating populations from the three crosses Laura/Triple Dirk, Laura/RL5407 and Genesis/SK0263 were evaluated for common bunt resistance in the field for races T1, T13 and L7 and in the greenhouse for rac

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Bodroža Solarov, Marija, and Bojana Filipčev. "Spelt vs common wheat: potential advantages and benefits." Acta Innovations, no. 35 (April 1, 2020): 57–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.32933/actainnovations.35.4.

Full text

Abstract:

This work gives a brief review of existing studies that compares spelt and modern wheat from various aspects of quality including technological, nutritional, functional and safety performance. Spelt shows acceptable breadmaking performances. It can be used for bread, cookie, cracker and pasta manufacture with some adaptations in processing. Regarding nutritional quality, spelt is very similar to wheat and represents richer source of selenium, folates, phytosterols and alkilresorcinols than modern wheats. From the aspect of food safety, spelt shows advantages as being a hulled wheat.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Mancuso, Teresina, Tibor Verduna, Simone Blanc, Giuseppe Di Vita, and Filippo Brun. "Environmental sustainability and economic matters of commercial types of common wheat." Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 65, No. 4 (2019): 194–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/172/2018-agricecon.

Full text

Abstract:

Common wheat, a fundamental commodity on international markets, is increasingly differentiated into commercial types on domestic markets to meet the demand of processing companies. Improver wheat, biscuit wheat, ordinary and superior bread-making wheat are commercial varieties with specific technological characteristics. Wheat farming systems are constantly evolving, and as a result, related environmental issues emerge. We applied an LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) analysis, where the functional unit was 1 tonne of grain for each typology and system boundaries were from cradle to farm gate. Primar

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Mangova, M., and G. Rachovska. "Technological characteristics of newly developed mutant common winter wheat lines." Plant, Soil and Environment 50, No. 2 (2011): 84–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/3686-pse.

Full text

Abstract:

Fifteen hybrid-mutant lines and two direct mutant lines were studied in terms to their technological quality in 2000 and 2001 vegetation years. The hybrid-mutant lines were produced using chemical mutagen sodium azide at a concentration of 1mM on F<sub>2</sub> seeds. For parent cultivars, promising and well adapted Bulgarian and foreign common winter wheat cultivars were used. The direct mutant lines were obtained by gamma-irradiation and sodium azide treatment of dry seed from cultivars. The differences of the following three characteristics: quality index, softening of dough and

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Tytenko, Natalia, Tetiana Iefimenko, Anastasiia Navalihina, et al. "Microsatellite loci polymorphism in Miguschova wheat and common wheat cultivars." NaUKMA Research Papers. Biology and Ecology 3 (July 21, 2020): 14–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.18523/2617-4529.2020.3.14-19.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Kozhahmetov, K. K., and A. I. Abugalieva. "Using gene fund of wild relatives for common wheat improvement." International Journal of Biology and Chemistry 7, no. 2 (2014): 41–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.26577/2218-7979-2014-7-2-41-43.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

ÅKERMAN, Å. "SPELTLIKE BUD-SPORTS IN COMMON WHEAT." Hereditas 1, no. 1 (2010): 116–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1920.tb02455.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Endo, T. R., and B. S. Gill. "The Deletion Stocks of Common Wheat." Journal of Heredity 87, no. 4 (1996): 295–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Stevenson, A., P. K. Mccarthy, and M. Griffin. "Polyclonal antisera against unheated and heated common wheat specific gamma and omega gliadins for the detection of adulteration of durum wheat and durum wheat products with common wheats." Food and Agricultural Immunology 6, no. 4 (1994): 435–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540109409354855.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Järve, K., I. Jakobson, and T. Enno. "Tetraploid wheat species Triticum timopheevii and Triticum militinae in common wheat improvement." Acta Agronomica Hungarica 50, no. 4 (2002): 463–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/aagr.50.2002.4.9.

Full text

Abstract:

Timopheevii wheats are discussed as donors for improving the disease resistance of common wheat. Attention is paid to the comparison of the morphological and chromosomal characteristics of Triticum timopheevii and T. militinae, their crossability with T. aestivum and their response to fungal diseases. The possible origin of T. militinae from an introgressive hybridization between T. timopheevii and an unknown species is discussed. Major genes for resistance to various fungal diseases, transferred to common wheat from T. timopheevii, are listed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Biel, Wioletta, Anna Jaroszewska, Sławomir Stankowski, Magdalena Sobolewska, and Jagoda Kępińska-Pacelik. "Comparison of yield, chemical composition and farinograph properties of common and ancient wheat grains." European Food Research and Technology 247, no. 6 (2021): 1525–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-021-03729-7.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe chemical composition of 4 spring wheat species was analyzed: einkorn (Triticum monococcum) (local cv.), emmer (Triticum dicoccon) (Lamella cv.), spelt (Triticum spelta) (Wirtas cv.), and common wheat (Triticum aestivum) (Rospuda cv.). Mean emmer and einkorn yield was significantly lower than that of common wheat. The analyses of the wheat grain included the content of total protein, crude ash, crude fat, crude fibre, carbohydrates, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc. The grains of the tested ancient wheats were richer in protein, lipids, cr

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

MATSUOKA, Yasuyuki, Shin-ichiro ARAMI, Megumi SATO, et al. "Development of Methods to Distinguish between Durum/Common Wheat and Common Wheat in Blended Flour Using PCR." Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi) 53, no. 5 (2012): 195–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.53.195.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Hirosawa, Shujiro, Shigeo Takumi, Takashige Ishii, Taihachi Kawahara, Chiharu Nakamura, and Naoki Mori. "Chloroplast and nuclear DNA variation in common wheat: insight into the origin and evolution of common wheat." Genes & Genetic Systems 79, no. 5 (2004): 271–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1266/ggs.79.271.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Bayram, Mustafa, and Kayıhan Korkut. "Effect of the glutenin genes on quality parameters in common wheat." Journal of Central European Agriculture 21, no. 1 (2020): 62–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.5513/jcea01/21.1.2422.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Dimitrov, Evgeniy, Zlatina Uhr, and Nikolaya Velcheva. "Genetic distance of common winter wheat varieties." Genetika 53, no. 2 (2021): 521–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/gensr2102521d.

Full text

Abstract:

The study was conducted during the period 2017-2019 in the experimental field of IPGR Sadovo. Wheat is the most important agricultural crop worldwide. Bulgarian wheat production in 2019 amounts to 6.162 thousand tons - an increase of 5.7% compared to 2018, due to the relatively favorable climatic conditions in the process of crop development, which led to an increase in average yield (with 6.8%). Twenty nine common winter wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.) with Belorusian origin and two Bulgarian varieties - Sadovo 1 and Enola were evaluated. The studied materials were sown in 2 rows with

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Demina, E. A., A. I. Kincharov, T. Yu Taranova, O. S. Mullayanova, and K. Yu Chekmasova. "Promising spring common wheat variety Kinelskaya 2020." Achievements of Science and Technology in Agro-Industrial Complex 35, no. 7 (2021): 29–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.53859/02352451_2021_35_7_29.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Kiseleva, A. A., and E. A. Salina. "Genetic Regulation of Common Wheat Heading Time." Russian Journal of Genetics 54, no. 4 (2018): 375–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s1022795418030067.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Matanguihan, J. B., K. M. Murphy, and S. S. Jones. "Control of Common Bunt in Organic Wheat." Plant Disease 95, no. 2 (2011): 92–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/pdis-09-10-0620.

Full text

Abstract:

Common bunt, caused by the seedborne and soilborne pathogens Tilletia caries and T. laevis, has re-emerged as a major disease in organic wheat. In conventional agriculture, common bunt is routinely managed with the use of synthetic chemical seed treatments. For this reason, common bunt is a relatively unimportant disease in conventional agriculture. However, since synthetic chemical inputs are prohibited in organic agriculture, common bunt is a major threat once more in organic wheat and seed production. The challenge today is to manage the disease without the use of chemical seed treatments.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Liu, Miao, Qiang Zhao, Feng Qi, et al. "Sequence divergence between spelt and common wheat." Theoretical and Applied Genetics 131, no. 5 (2018): 1125–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3064-z.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Joshi, Bal Krisna, Dhruba Bahadur Thapa, and Madan Raj Bhatta. "Genetic Parameters of Common Wheat in Nepal." Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council 1 (September 20, 2016): 9–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jnarc.v1i0.15718.

Full text

Abstract:

Knowledge on variation within traits and their genetics are prerequisites in crop improvement program. Thus, in present paper we aimed to estimate genetic and environmental indices of common wheat genotypes. For the purpose, eight quantitative traits were measured from 30 wheat genotypes, which were in randomized complete block design with 3 replicates. Components of variance and covariance were estimated along with heritability, genetic gain, realized heritability, coheritability and correlated response. Differences between phenotypic and genotypic variances in heading days, maturity days and

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Jiang, Jiming, Kay L. D. Morris, and Bikram S. Gill. "Introgression ofElymus trachycaulus chromatin into common wheat." Chromosome Research 2, no. 1 (1994): 3–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01539447.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Fadeeva, I. D. "A new winter common wheat VARIETY ‘Sultan’." Grain Economy of Russia, no. 3 (July 7, 2023): 60–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2023-86-3-60-64.

Full text

Abstract:

Winter wheat occupies significant areas in the fields of the Republic of Tatarstan. The purpose of the current paper was to develope a new winter common wheat variety ‘Sultan’ and to identify its ability to produce not only high yields, but also grain quality in the conditions of the Republic. The study was carried out on the fields of the TatRIA, a separate structural subdivision of the FRC KazSC RAS on gray forest soil when sown on bare fallow at the optimal time for this area. The paper has presented the characteristics of the variety according to economically valuable traits during the yea

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Malik, R., G. L. Brown-Guedira, C. M. Smith, T. L. Harvey, and B. S. Gill. "Genetic Mapping of Wheat Curl Mite Resistance Genes and in Common Wheat." Crop Science 43, no. 2 (2003): 644. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.0644.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Edwards, Nancy M., Donatella Peressini, James E. Dexter, and Steven J. Mulvaney. "Viscoelastic properties of durum wheat and common wheat dough of different strengths." Rheologica Acta 40, no. 2 (2001): 142–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003970000147.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Musilová, M., V. Trojan, T. Vyhnánek, and L. Havel. "Genetic variability for coloured caryopses in common wheat varieties determined by microsatellite markers." Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 49, No. 3 (2013): 116–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/160/2012-cjgpb.

Full text

Abstract:

Products made from wheat are the most important components of the human diet, and could also become a source of functional foods and feed ingredients, e.g. minerals, vitamins and/or phytochemicals. The caryopses of certain wheat genotypes contain antioxidants, i.e. anthocyanins or carotenoids, which cause purple, blue or yellow coloration. The first step before the introduction of these traits into individual wheat cultivars is the characterization of relationships and the possibility of new gene combinations. In this study, relationships among 24 genotypes with different types of caryopsis co

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Dumalasová, V., and P. Bartoš. "Wheat reaction to common bunt in the field and in the greenhouse." Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 42, Special Issue (2012): 37–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/6229-cjgpb.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Rachoń, Leszek, Aneta Bobryk-Mamczarz, and Anna Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz. "Hulled Wheat Productivity and Quality in Modern Agriculture Against Conventional Wheat Species." Agriculture 10, no. 7 (2020): 275. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070275.

Full text

Abstract:

The objective of this study is to compare the yields and qualities of the hulled wheats emmer (Triticum dicoccum Schübl.) and spelt (Triticum aestivum L. ssp. spelta) with the commonly cultivated naked wheats common wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ssp. vulgare) and durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Three years of field experiments were carried out from 2015 to 2017 in the Lubelskie province (Poland) on rendzina soils. The experimental results indicate that the hulled wheats, even when cultivated with advanced technology, produced lower yields compared to the common and durum wheats (reduced by 3

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Dolzhenko, D. O., P. N. Malchikov, A. A. Zueva, A. I. Menibaev, and N. E. Bugakova. "PROSPECTS FOR BREEDING WINTER COMMON WHEAT FOR RESISTANCE TO LEAF RUST USING MOLECULAR MARKERS." Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Agricultural Sciences 1, no. 2 (2022): 44–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.37313/2782-6562-2022-1-2-44-50.

Full text

Abstract:

Wheat leaf rust is a harmful disease whose epiphytotics lead to serious grain yield losses. Severe epiphytoties of leaf rust are observed once every 3-4 years in the Volga Region. Despite numerous breeding achievements, many modern wheat varieties in the Russian Federation are not resistant to leaf rust. Studies of the newest assortment of soft wheat, carried out by Russian researchers, show that the genotypes of 93% of the studied varieties contained Lr genes individually or in various combinations; the Lr34 gene is widely represented in combinations with the ineffective juvenile genes Lr3, L

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Arshid, Ahmad Khanday. "Phytotoxicity of common pesticides to physiological and biochemical makeup of Triticumaestivumvar. Lok-1." GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences 18, no. 3 (2022): 092–99. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6393366.

Full text

Abstract:

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of five different pesticides (Triazocel, Superkiller-25, Vitavax power, Cut-out and VAAR) belonging to different chemical groups on the germination, plant growth, carbohydrate, protein and chlorophyll content and the yield of wheat crop. VAAR was found the most toxic pesticide resulting in significant decrease in all the parameters of the crop and above 3 ppm concentration brought forth aborted wheat seeds in all the replicates. Vitavax power was the least toxic pesticide and resulted in stimulation of most of the studied parameters. All

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Hills, Melissa J., Linda M. Hall, Doug F. Messenger, Robert J. Graf, Brian L. Beres, and François Eudes. "Evaluation of crossability between triticale (XTriticosecaleWittmack) and common wheat, durum wheat and rye." Environmental Biosafety Research 6, no. 4 (2007): 249–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007046.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Ratajczak, Karolina, Hanna Sulewska, Szymańska Grażyna, and Przemysław Matysik. "Agronomic traits and grain quality of selected spelt wheat varieties versus common wheat." Journal of Crop Improvement 34, no. 5 (2020): 654–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2020.1761921.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Klechkovsky, Y., and H. Klechkovskaya. "Fusarium spp. and Wheat Fly Phorbia Securis Tiensuu Common Influence on the Wheat." Cereal Research Communications 25, no. 3 (1997): 767–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03543840.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Zrcková, Monika, Ivana Capouchová, Luboš Paznocht, et al. "Variation of the total content of polyphenols and phenolic acids in einkorn, emmer, spelt and common wheat grain as a function of genotype, wheat species and crop year." Plant, Soil and Environment 65, No. 5 (2019): 260–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/134/2019-pse.

Full text

Abstract:

The study aimed at evaluating the total content of polyphenols (TPC) and phenolic acids (TPA) in grain of 4 spring einkorn, 4 emmer, 4 spelt and 4 common wheat genotypes cultivated under organic cropping system in two-year trials. The TPC and TPA were significantly affected both by genotype, wheat species and crop year (weather conditions). At the same time, TPC and TPA were mainly affected by the crop year while the effect of genetic factors was lesser. The TPC ranged from 618 mg/kg DM (dry matter) (common wheat cv. Annie) to 792.37 mg/kg DM (Triticum monococcum GEO) and TPA from 700.66 mg/kg

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Knott, D. R., Dapeng Bai, and Janice Zale. "The transfer of leaf and stem rust resistance from wild emmer wheats to durum and common wheat." Canadian Journal of Plant Science 85, no. 1 (2005): 49–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/p03-212.

Full text

Abstract:

Wild emmer wheats (Triticum turgidum var. dicoccoides L.) are potentially valuable sources of leaf rust (Puccinia triticina Eriks.) and stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici Eriks. & Henn.) resistance in breeding both durum (T. turgidum var. durum L.) and common wheat (T. aestivum L.). In an extension of previous work, 11 rust resistant accessions of wild emmer wheat were crossed and backcrossed from two to five times to susceptible durum or common wheats. Genes for leaf or stem rust resistance were transferred singly into several susceptible genotypes. Backcross lines homozygous for

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Zheng, Dongyang, Kande Lin, Xueming Yang, Wenli Zhang, and Xuejiao Cheng. "Functional Characterization of Accessible Chromatin in Common Wheat." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 17 (2024): 9384. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179384.

Full text

Abstract:

Eukaryotic gene transcription is fine-tuned by precise spatiotemporal interactions between cis-regulatory elements (CREs) and trans-acting factors. However, how CREs individually or coordinated with epigenetic marks function in regulating homoeolog bias expression is still largely unknown in wheat. In this study, through comprehensively characterizing open chromatin coupled with DNA methylation in the seedling and spikelet of common wheat, we observed that differential chromatin openness occurred between the seedling and spikelet, which plays important roles in tissue development through regul

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Adonina, I. G., E. M. Timonova, and E. A. Salina. "Introgressive Hybridization of Common Wheat: Results and Prospects." Russian Journal of Genetics 57, no. 4 (2021): 390–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s1022795421030029.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Al-Taae, A. "SUCEPTIBILITY OF SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS TO COMMON BUNT." Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture 38 (February 28, 2010): 44–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2010.36282.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Zhou, Huajie, Lei Xu, Feng Li, and Yansha Li. "Transcriptional regulation by CRISPR/dCas9 in common wheat." Gene 807 (January 2022): 145919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2021.145919.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Efremova, T., V. Arbuzova, I. Leonova, and K. Makhmudova. "Multiple allelism in theVrn-B1locus of common wheat." Cereal Research Communications 39, no. 1 (2011): 12–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/crc.39.2011.1.2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Hoshino, Tsuguhiro, Seiji Ito, Kouchi Hatta, Toshik Nakamura, and Makoto Yamamori. "Development of Waxy Common Wheat by Haploid Breeding." Ikushugaku zasshi 46, no. 2 (1996): 185–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.46.185.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Ashida, Taizo, Shuhei Nasuda, Kazuhiro Sato, and Takashi R. Endo. "Dissection of barley chromosome 5H in common wheat." Genes & Genetic Systems 82, no. 2 (2007): 123–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1266/ggs.82.123.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Tsuchida, Masashi, Takehiro Fukushima, Shuhei Nasuda, et al. "Dissection of rye chromosome 1R in common wheat." Genes & Genetic Systems 83, no. 1 (2008): 43–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1266/ggs.83.43.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Goncharov, N. P., S. V. Bannikova, and S. E. Peltek. "Cultivar Identification of a Monosomic Common Wheat Series." Russian Journal of Genetics 39, no. 12 (2003): 1465–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:ruge.0000009165.87364.4d.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Barbour, Margaret M., Sarah Bachmann, Urmil Bansal, Harbans Bariana, and Peter Sharp. "Genetic control of mesophyll conductance in common wheat." New Phytologist 209, no. 2 (2015): 461–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13628.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Whelan, Ernest D. P., and E. G. Kokko. "Scanning electron microscopy of chromosomes of common wheat." Genome 35, no. 1 (1992): 166–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g92-027.

Full text

Abstract:

The higher magnifications and resolution possible with scanning electron microscopy can provide more detailed information on chromosome morphology than light microscopy. However, overlying cell debris can obscure surface details. A method is described whereby standard organic acid–alcohol fixatives and slightly modified techniques of routine plant chromosome squash preparations can be used to provide samples of mitotic and meiotic chromosomes of wheat suitable for examination by scanning electron microscopy.Key words: scanning electron microscopy, light microscopy, wheat, chromosomes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

MA, YONGQING. "Allelopathic studies of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)." Weed Biology and Management 5, no. 3 (2005): 93–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2005.00164.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!