To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: In-group favoritism.

Journal articles on the topic 'In-group favoritism'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'In-group favoritism.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Kajiwara, Takamasa, Masako Myowa, and Nobuhiro Mifune. "Trait Negative Reputational Concerns Among In-group Members and In-group Favoritism in Minimal Groups." Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science 13, no. 1 (2022): 6–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5178/lebs.2022.91.

Full text
Abstract:
People tend to behave more cooperatively with in-group members than out-group members, even in minimal group situations. This study investigated the relationship between trait reputational concern (fear of negative evaluation) from in-group members and in-group favoritism in minimal group contexts. A total of 176 participants completed hypothetical prisoner’s dilemma games; when reputation was at stake, in-group favoritism was significantly associated with trait negative reputational concern. In this context, greater concerns about reputation from in-group members resulted in stronger in-group
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lewis, Gary J., and Timothy C. Bates. "The Temporal Stability of In-Group Favoritism Is Mostly Attributable to Genetic Factors." Social Psychological and Personality Science 8, no. 8 (2017): 897–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550617699250.

Full text
Abstract:
Twin studies of in-group favoritism have reported roughly equal influences of genetic and environmental factors. All, however, have solely relied on cross-sectional approaches, leaving open the question of whether genetic and environmental factors have similar roles on stability and change for in-group favoritism across time. While in-group favoritism is commonly perceived to reflect environmental influences, stable environmental effects are rare for psychological traits, thus suggesting that genetic influences may play the major role in the stability of favoritism. Here, we used addressed thi
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Weeks, Kelly Pledger, Matthew Weeks, and Nicolas Long. "Generational perceptions at work: in-group favoritism and out-group stereotypes." Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 36, no. 1 (2017): 33–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/edi-07-2016-0062.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between stereotypes, in-group favoritism, and in-group bolstering effects across generations. Design/methodology/approach Based on the trends found in a qualitative study on generational stereotypes, questions on work ethic, work-life balance, and use of technology were administered to 255 participants identified as Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers. Hypotheses predicted that with a strong stereotype, traditional in-group favoritism will not be found; however, an in-group bolstering effect will emerge. In the absence of
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Fiedler, Susann, Dshamilja Marie Hellmann, Angela Rachael Dorrough, and Andreas Glöckner. "Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America." Judgment and Decision Making 13, no. 1 (2018): 42–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500008810.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractAs individuals from different nations increasingly interact with each other, research on national in-group favoritism becomes particularly vital. In a cross-national, large-scale study (N = 915) including representative samples from four Latin American nations (Chile, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela) and the USA, we explore differences regarding nationality-based in-group favoritism. In-group favoritism is assessed through differences in prosocial behavior toward persons from the own nation as compared to persons from other nations in fully incentivized one-shot dictator games. We find stron
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gabriel, Ute. "Language Policies and In-group Favoritism." Social Psychology 39, no. 2 (2008): 103–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.39.2.103.

Full text
Abstract:
This study investigates the influence of sex of respondent, context valence, and type of generic on the naming of female personalities in Norway where the feminine suffixing has dropped away in reaction to the problem of linguistic sexism. A total of 162 participants were asked to name either their most- or least-liked personalities. The survey employed either the generic form only or the generic form together with the obsolete feminine forms. Adding the feminine forms led to a significant increase in the number of female personalities named, suggesting that the Norwegian policy of gender neut
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Palmeira, Mauricio, and Shahin Sharifi. "Minority group favoritism in service encounters." European Journal of Marketing 54, no. 8 (2020): 1937–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ejm-03-2019-0240.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose This paper aims to investigate consumer reactions to minority retail employees. The paper argues that despite the persistence of racism and homophobia in society, the vast majority of the population is strongly against these forms of discrimination. Because of the profound negativity of such behavior, the study hypothesizes that consumers will be motivated to see themselves unequivocally as individuals free of prejudice. As a result, rather than treating all people equally, the study proposes that consumers will overcompensate and exhibit favoritism toward a retail employee when the la
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hunter, John A., Michael J. Platow, Saleh Moradi, et al. "Subjective belonging and in-group favoritism." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 73 (November 2017): 136–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Leach, Colin Wayne, Luciana Carraro, Randi L. Garcia, and Jessica J. Kang. "Morality stereotyping as a basis of women’s in-group favoritism: An implicit approach." Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 20, no. 2 (2016): 153–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430215603462.

Full text
Abstract:
Four studies used three different implicit methods (the BriefIAT, Affect Misattribution Procedure, and Lexical Decision Task) to measure women’s gender stereotypes of violence, strength, competence, trustworthiness, and sociability. Analyses of response latencies in Study 1 ( N = 100) showed that these stereotypes were based more in in-group favoritism than out-group derogation. Consistent with recent evidence that morality is central to the positive evaluation of in-groups, it was the implicit stereotype of women as more trustworthy that best predicted their implicit in-group favoritism acros
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Cadsby, C. Bram, Ninghua Du, and Fei Song. "In-group favoritism and moral decision-making." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 128 (August 2016): 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bennett, Mark, Evanthia Lyons, Fabio Sani, and Martyn Barrett. "Children's subjective identification with the group and in-group favoritism." Developmental Psychology 34, no. 5 (1998): 902–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.902.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Mutz, Diana C., and Eunji Kim. "The Impact of In-group Favoritism on Trade Preferences." International Organization 71, no. 4 (2017): 827–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818317000327.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractUsing a population-based survey experiment, this study evaluates the role of in-group favoritism in influencing American attitudes toward international trade. By systematically altering which countries gain or lose from a given trade policy (Americans and/or people in trading partner countries), we vary the role that in-group favoritism should play in influencing preferences.Our results provide evidence of two distinct forms of in-group favoritism. The first, and least surprising, is that Americans value the well-being of other Americans more than that of people outside their own count
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

ALIZADEH, MEYSAM, CLAUDIO CIOFFI-REVILLA, and ANDREW CROOKS. "THE EFFECT OF IN-GROUP FAVORITISM ON THE COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUALS' OPINIONS." Advances in Complex Systems 18, no. 01n02 (2015): 1550002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219525915500022.

Full text
Abstract:
Empirical findings from social psychology show that sometimes people show favoritism toward in-group members in order to reach a global consensus, even against individuals' own preferences (e.g., altruistically or deontically). Here we integrate ideas and findings on in-group favoritism, opinion dynamics, and radicalization using an agent-based model entitled cooperative bounded confidence (CBC). We investigate the interplay of homophily, rejection, and in-group cooperation drivers on the formation of opinion clusters and the emergence of extremist, radical opinions. Our model is the first to
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Batinić, Marija, and Nina Hadžiahmetović. "Unutargrupna pristranost / In-Group Bias." Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo / Radovi Filozofskog fakulteta u Sarajevu, ISSN 2303-6990 on-line, no. 26 (December 31, 2023): 185–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.46352/23036990.2023.185.

Full text
Abstract:
Religion represents a system of beliefs, understandings, and actions from which religious individuals draw an array of values for their judgments of the world. Religiousness is a multidimensional construct comprising a multitude of religious orientations of which extrinsic and intrinsic religiousness are the most prominent in scientific literature. Also, in the social psychological domain, religion represents a social group whose members show a tendency toward in-group bias, a phenomenon basically immanent in every social group. The construct of in-group favoritism refers to a tendency of favo
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

KOBAYASHI, Tomoyuki, and Masanori OIKAWA. "Effects of Perceived Status Difference on In-group/Out-group Favoritism." Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association 76 (September 11, 2012): 3PMB03. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.76.0_3pmb03.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Dickens, Andrew. "Ethnolinguistic Favoritism in African Politics." American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10, no. 3 (2018): 370–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/app.20160066.

Full text
Abstract:
African political leaders have a tendency to favor members of their own ethnic group. Yet for all other ethnic groups in a country, it is unclear whether having a similar ethnicity to the leader is beneficial. To shed light on this issue, I use a continuous measure of linguistic similarity to quantify the ethnic similarity of a leader to all ethnic groups in a country. Combined with panel data on 163 ethnic groups partitioned across 35 sub-Saharan countries, I use within-group time variation in similarity that results from a partitioned group's concurrent exposure to multiple national leaders.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Duran, Miguel A., and Antonio J. Morales. "The Rise and Spread of Favoritism Practices." B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 14, no. 1 (2014): 397–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2013-0003.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe common sensical definition of favoritism implies some kind of discrimination. We propose a model where a group of agents commit to give preference to their members when making job offers. This endogamic behavior is advantageous because members enjoy preferential job offers, but they incur in link costs and potential efficiency losses. Unlike the standard approach to favoritism, agents in our model make strategic joining decisions and as a result of the counterbalancing effects of favoritism, an optimal clique size appears in equilibrium. We show that favoritism is not compatible wi
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Konrad, Kai A., and Florian Morath. "Evolutionarily stable in-group favoritism and out-group spite in intergroup conflict." Journal of Theoretical Biology 306 (August 2012): 61–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.04.013.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Iacoviello, Vincenzo, and Fabio Lorenzi-Cioldi. "Self-Depersonalization and Ingroup Favoritism in Minimal Group Hierarchies." Swiss Journal of Psychology 77, no. 1 (2018): 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000202.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract. Research suggests that members of low-status groups are more likely than members of high-status groups to show self-depersonalization and to favor ingroup members over outgroup members. The present research tests two alternative explanations of this status asymmetry: One explanation is based on the motive for achieving a positive social identity, and the other explanation is based on the willingness to cope with a social identity threat. Three minimal group experiments examine these two explanations. Supporting the identity motive explanation, the findings show that self-depersonaliz
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Carlo, Gustavo, Alexandra N. Davis, and Laura K. Taylor. "Reducing Youth In-Group Favoritism to Address Social Injustice." Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no. 1 (2022): 90–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23727322211068387.

Full text
Abstract:
Social injustices toward minority groups are pervasive around the world, and further exacerbated by global threats such as COVID-19 and climate change. Prosocial tendencies, such as empathy, moral reasoning, and helping behaviors directed only toward members of one's own social groups, discriminate against outgroups, and can perpetuate an unjust status quo. Yet, recent meta-analyses point to effective intervention programs that can foster prosocial responses across group lines. Developmental science has identified evidence-based interventions, policies, and programs to foster inclusive prosoci
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Grimm, Veronika, Verena Utikal, and Lorenzo Valmasoni. "In-group favoritism and discrimination among multiple out-groups." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 143 (November 2017): 254–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.08.015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Perry, Ryan, Naomi Priest, Yin Paradies, Fiona Kate Barlow, and Chris G. Sibley. "Barriers to Multiculturalism." Social Psychological and Personality Science 9, no. 1 (2017): 89–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550617703169.

Full text
Abstract:
Bias in favor of the in-group is a key determinant of discrimination and is thought to be largely independent of, and qualitatively distinct from, out-group hostility. One key difference, according to realistic conflict theory, is that in-group preferences become more closely associated with discrimination when intergroup threat is salient. The current study presents a direct comparison of the level of association of in-group favoritism and out-group hostility with opposition to multiculturalism policies in New Zealand. With both predictors operationalized as affect ratings of warmth and anger
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Messick, David M. "Social Categories and Business Ethics." Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 1 (1998): 149–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ruffinx1998111.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article, I want to draw attention to one strand ofthe complex web of processes that are involved when people group others, including themselves, into social categories. I will focus on the tendency to treat members of one's own group more favorably than nonmembers, a tendency that has been called ingroup favoritism. The structure of the article has three parts. First I will offer anevolutionary argument as to why ingroup favoritism, or something very much like it, is required by theories of the evolution of altruism. I will then review some of the basic social psychological research fi
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Dickinson, David L., David Masclet, and Emmanuel Peterle. "Discrimination as favoritism: The private benefits and social costs of in-group favoritism in an experimental labor market." European Economic Review 104 (May 2018): 220–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.03.004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Johnson, Megan K., Wade C. Rowatt, and Jordan P. LaBouff. "Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?" Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 4, no. 2 (2012): 154–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025107.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Verkuyten, Maykel, and Angela De Wolf. "The development of in-group favoritism: Between social reality and group identity." Developmental Psychology 43, no. 4 (2007): 901–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.901.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Aviram, Ron B. "Object relations and prejudice: from in-group favoritism to out-group hatred." International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 4, no. 1 (2007): 4–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps.121.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Jones, Benjamin R., Shaun Wiley, Alexander C. LoPilato, and Jason J. Dahling. "One of us? How leaders can use subtle identity performances to build trust among ingroups and outgroups." Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 23, no. 1 (2018): 109–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430218779701.

Full text
Abstract:
Leaders often face the dilemma of earning trust among different subgroups. How can leaders “reach across the aisle” to build trust among outgroup members without alienating their own ingroup in the process? We suggest one solution is for leaders to couple their efforts to appeal to the outgroup with subtle identity performances, behavioral cues that ingroup members understand as prototypical, but that are effectively invisible to outgroup members who are not familiar with ingroup symbols and norms. We conducted an experiment in which we manipulated the leader’s group membership (ingroup or out
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

DIMDINS, GIRTS, and HENRY MONTGOMERY. "Differentiating in-group favoritism from shared reality in intergroup perception." Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 45, no. 5 (2004): 417–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00423.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Meier, Stephan, Lamar Pierce, Antonino Vaccaro, and Barbara La Cara. "Trust and in-group favoritism in a culture of crime." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 132 (December 2016): 78–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.09.005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Messick, David M. "Social Categories and Business Ethics." Business Ethics Quarterly 8, S1 (1998): 149–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1052150x00400126.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article, I want to draw attention to one strand of the complex web of processes that are involved when people group others, including themselves, into social categories. I will focus on the tendency to treat members of one’s own group more favorably than nonmembers, a tendency that has been called ingroup favoritism. The structure of the article has three parts. First I will offer an evolutionary argument as to why ingroup favoritism, or something very much like it, is required by theories of the evolution of altruism. I will then review some of the basic social psychological research
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Asai, Nobuko. "Causal attribution of discrimination and favoritism in a disadvantaged group." Japanese journal of psychology 77, no. 4 (2006): 317–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.77.317.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Kleissner, Verena, and Georg Jahn. "Dimensions of Work-Related Age Stereotypes and In-Group Favoritism." Research on Aging 42, no. 3-4 (2019): 126–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0164027519896189.

Full text
Abstract:
Age stereotypes in the context of work take effect in management decisions and leadership behavior. We aimed to comprehensively measure main dimensions of work-related age stereotypes, namely, performance, adaptability, reliability, and warmth, and explored how they vary across age groups, thereby testing predictions of social identity theory and associations with social contact. Three hundred and eighty German nurses aged between 19 and 63 years participated in this study. Older nurses were seen as more competent, less physically strong, and less adaptable, whereas younger nurses were seen as
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Lewis, Gary J., and Timothy C. Bates. "Genetic Evidence for Multiple Biological Mechanisms Underlying In-Group Favoritism." Psychological Science 21, no. 11 (2010): 1623–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610387439.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Aksoy, Billur, and Marco A. Palma. "The effects of scarcity on cheating and in-group favoritism." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 165 (September 2019): 100–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.06.024.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Otten, Sabine, and Dirk Wentura. "Self-Anchoring and In-Group Favoritism: An Individual Profiles Analysis." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37, no. 6 (2001): 525–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1479.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Feinstein, Brian D., William R. Heaston, and Guilherme Siqueira de Carvalho. "In‐Group Favoritism as Legal Strategy: Evidence from FCPA Settlements." American Business Law Journal 60, no. 1 (2023): 5–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12218.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Mei, Dongmei, Wenjian Zhang, and Lijun Yin. "Neural responses of in-group “favoritism” and out-group “discrimination” toward moral behaviors." Neuropsychologia 139 (March 2020): 107375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107375.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Hertel, Guido, and Norbert L. Kerr. "Priming In-Group Favoritism: The Impact of Normative Scripts in the Minimal Group Paradigm." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37, no. 4 (2001): 316–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1447.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Crawford, Jarret T., and John Ruscio. "Asking People to Explain Complex Policies Does Not Increase Political Moderation: Three Preregistered Failures to Closely Replicate Fernbach, Rogers, Fox, and Sloman’s (2013) Findings." Psychological Science 32, no. 4 (2021): 611–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797620972367.

Full text
Abstract:
Fernbach et al. (2013) found that political extremism and partisan in-group favoritism can be reduced by asking people to provide mechanistic explanations for complex policies, thus making their lack of procedural-policy knowledge salient. Given the practical importance of these findings, we conducted two preregistered close replications of Fernbach et al.’s Experiment 2 (Replication 1a: N = 306; Replication 1b: N = 405) and preregistered close and conceptual replications of Fernbach et al.’s Experiment 3 (Replication 2: N = 343). None of the key effects were statistically significant, and onl
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Stolyarov, O. D. "A GROUP OF FOREIGNERS IN THE RULING ELITE OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE IN THE 1730S: MAIN DEVELOPMENT TRENDS." Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. History Sciences 4, no. 1 (2022): 5–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.37313/2658-4816-2021-4-1-5-10.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is devoted to foreigners as an integral part of the Russian ruling elite during the reign of Anna Ioannovna, when, as it is known, foreigners played a significant role in political decision-making and in court life. The author analyzes the concept of the ruling elite and establishes the criteria by which certain statesmen and grandees should be attributed to its representatives. He defines the main aspects of the analysis of the foreign part of this group, namely, the dynamics of its number, criteria and degree of integration into Russian society, the spread of favoritism. The anal
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Musso, Pasquale, Cristiano Inguglia, and Alida Lo Coco. "Relationships Between Ethnic Identity, Ethnic Attitudes, and Acculturative Stress in Tunisian Individuals in Early and Middle Adolescence." Journal of Early Adolescence 37, no. 9 (2016): 1309–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431616659557.

Full text
Abstract:
Framed from an integrative approach, the current article examined the associations between ethnic identity exploration (EIE), ethnic identity commitment (EIC), and acculturative stress by investigating the mediating role of ethnic attitudes (i.e., in-group favoritism and out-group derogation) in these relationships. Additionally, the moderating role of age was analyzed. A multiple-group path analysis was performed on data collected from 256 Tunisians in early and 248 in middle adolescence living in Italy, which is an interesting and understudied immigrant group characterized by similarities an
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

de Cremer, David. "Relations of Self-Esteem Concerns, Group Identification, and Self-Stereotyping to In-Group Favoritism." Journal of Social Psychology 141, no. 3 (2001): 389–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600560.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Telzer, Eva H., Nicolas Ichien, and Yang Qu. "The ties that bind: Group membership shapes the neural correlates of in-group favoritism." NeuroImage 115 (July 2015): 42–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.035.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Isbell, Linda M., and James M. Tyler. "Teaching Students about In-Group Favoritism and the Minimal Groups Paradigm." Teaching of Psychology 30, no. 2 (2003): 127–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3002_10.

Full text
Abstract:
Research on minimal groups demonstrates that arbitrarily creating 2 groups leads to the development of in-group favoritism. Experiments using the minimal groups paradigm show students how easily in-group biases can be created simply by categorizing others. This article describes an in-class activity that demonstrates the power of categorization. Students completed a minimal groups experiment either before or after viewing the video A Class Divided. Regardless of when they viewed the video, students rated their arbitrarily assigned in-group more positively and less negatively than their out-gro
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Harashima, Masayuki, and Takashi Oguchi. "Effects of explicit and implicit self-esteem on in-group favoritism." JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 47, no. 1 (2007): 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.2130/jjesp.47.69.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Wann, Daniel L., Kenneth A. Weaver, and Stephen F. Davis. "The effects of disposition, situation, and setting on in-group favoritism." Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30, no. 4 (1992): 268–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03330461.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

ZHANG, Zhen, Haiwen LI, Jianping XIONG, Hui ZHAO, Ruixue LIU, and Chunhui QI. "Psychological development mechanism of in-group favoritism during fairness norm enforcement." Advances in Psychological Science 29, no. 12 (2021): 2091. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2021.02091.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Galinsky, Adam D., and Gordon B. Moskowitz. "Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78, no. 4 (2000): 708–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Du, Kangning, John A. Hunter, Damian Scarf, and Ted Ruffman. "Chinese children's in-group favoritism is affected by age and gender." Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 72 (January 2021): 101232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101232.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Kumar, Vivek, Paritosh Mishra, Suraj Bhan Yadav, and Sandeep Kumar Gupta. "In-group and out-group behavior in Indian multinational corporations: An analysis of its implications on organizational performance." Problems and Perspectives in Management 21, no. 3 (2023): 189–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.15.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to investigate in-group and out-group dynamics within multinational corporations in India and their influence on organizational performance. The paper uses concurrent triangulation. Primary data were gathered via a purposive sample of 500 employees across various demographic backgrounds, ensuring diversity. Respondents participated in an online survey and a few in-depth interviews, administered in-person or online, capturing their experiences of group dynamics. Survey data were analyzed using R, SPSS, and SAS, while thematic analysis was applied to in-depth intervi
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!