Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Unjustified / Книги

Книги з теми "Unjustified"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Unjustified.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 19 червня 2021

Оновлено: 1 лютого 2022

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 книг для дослідження на тему "Unjustified".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте книги для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Bar, Christian von. Unjustified enrichment. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

MacQueen, Hector L. Unjustified enrichment. Edinburgh: W. Green, 2013.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Visser, D. P. Unjustified enrichment. Cape Town: Juta, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Evans-Jones, Robin. Unjustified enrichment. Edinburgh: Thomson/W. Green, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Lanyon, Andrew. The unjustified text. Penzance: A. Lanyon, 1995.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Eiselen, Sieg. Unjustified enrichment: A casebook. Durban: Butterworths, 1993.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Eiselen, Sieg. Unjustified enrichment: A casebook. 3rd ed. Durban: LexisNexis, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Berry, Jack. Unjustified damnation: Nature of the crime. Akron, Ohio: Jim-Jac Pub., 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Sonnekus, J. C. Unjustified enrichment in South African law. Durban: LexisNexis, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Plessis, J. E. Du. The South African law of unjustified enrichment. Claremont, [South Africa]: Juta, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Dannemann, Gerhard. The German law of unjustified enrichment and restitution: A comparative introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Dannemann, Gerhard. The German law of unjustified enrichment and restitution: A comparative introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Dannemann, Gerhard. The German law of unjustified enrichment and restitution: A comparative introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Dudai, Ron. Trigger happy: Unjustified shooting and violation of the open-fire regulations during the al-Aqsa intifada. [Jerusalem: B'tselem, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Liu, Yanhao. Bu dang de li fa de xing cheng yu zhan kai: The Formation and Development of the Law of Unjustified Enrichment. 8th ed. Beijing Shi: Fa lü chu ban she, 2013.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Anfert'ev, Ivan. Modernization of Soviet Russia in 1920-1930-ies: transformation programme of the RCP(b) — VKP(b) as instruments of struggle for power. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1064904.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The monograph is devoted to studying the process of implementation of modernization projects of the RCP(b) - VKP(b) 1920-1930-ies in the context of intra-party struggle for power. A lack of managerial experience in the leadership of the country, declared utopian ideas, the bureaucratization of the party-state apparatus and the commitment to radical ways of solving problems gave rise to political and socio-economic crises affect the results. Revealed the limits of the political life of leaders of the ruling party in the implementation of the political-administrative projects considered as a series of unjustified social and economic experiments, criticized the concept of the Soviet state as an apparatus of violence in the interests of the world proletarian revolution. Intended for specialists in the history of Soviet Russia of the twentieth century, University professors, and for anyone interested in Russian history.

17

Plessis, J. E. Du. Compulsion and restitution: A historical and comparative study of the treatment of compulsion in Scottish private law with particular emphasis on its relevance to the law of restitution or unjustified enrichment. Edinburgh: Stair Society, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Plessis, Jacques Etienne du. Compulsion and restitution: A historical and comparative study of the treatment of compulsion in Scottish private law with particular emphasis on its relevance to the law of restitution or unjustified enrichment. Edinburgh: Stair Society, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Protection from unjustified premiums: Hearing of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, second session, on examining protection from certain premiums, April 20, 2010. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Manor, C. E. Unjustified Punishment. SCHIEL & DENVER PUBLISHING LIMITED, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Unjustified Favor. CreateSpace, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

J, Beatson, and Schrage E. J. H, eds. Unjustified enrichment. Oxford: Hart Pub., 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Johnston, David, and Reinhard Zimmermann, eds. Unjustified Enrichment. Cambridge University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511495519.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Office, International Labour, and International Labour Conference (82nd : 1995 : Geneva, Switzerland), eds. Protection against unjustified dismissal. Geneva: International Labour Office, 1995.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

KINROSS, ROBIN. Unjustified Texts: Perspectives on Typography. Hyphen, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

Johnston, David, and Reinhard Zimmermann. Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Unjustified enrichment: Key issues in comparative perspective. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

(Editor), David Johnston, and Reinhard Zimmermann (Editor), eds. Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Ovalle, Gahrey. Unjustified: Where Have Our Black Leaders Gone? Gahrey Ovalle, 2021.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Wouter, De Vos, Bennett T. W, Visser D. P, and University of Cape Town. Faculty of Law., eds. Unjustified enrichment: Essays in honour of Wouter de Vos. Cape Town: Juta, 1992.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Medina, Vicente. Terrorism Unjustified: The Use and Misuse of Political Violence. Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Unjustified enrichment: A comparative study of the law of restitution. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Shapiro, Lawrence A. Miracle Myth: Why Belief in the Resurrection and the Supernatural Is Unjustified. Columbia University Press, 2017.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Commission, Scottish Law. Report on Unjustified Enrichment, Error of Law and Public Authority Receipts and Disbursments. Stationery Office Books, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Shapiro, Lawrence A. The miracle myth: Why belief in the Resurrection and the supernatural Is unjustified. 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

(Editor), Stephen Swann, and Christian von Bar (Editor), eds. Principles of European Law: Volume Six: Volume Six: Unjustified Enrichment (European Civil Code Series). Oxford University Press, USA, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Russell, P. W. L. Unjustified Enrichment: A Comparatives Study of the Law of Restitution (Juridische Reeks Vrije Universiteit, Nr. 14.). Vu University Press, 1997.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Protection Against Unjustified Dismissal: General Survey on the Termination of Employment Convention (No.158 and Recommendation). International Labour Org, 1995.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Jong, Sang Jo. Systematic Government Access to Private-Sector Data in the Republic of Korea. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190685515.003.0014.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This chapter examines the statutory grounds for governmental access to private-sector data in Korea. It focuses on issues such as the circumstances under which access is allowed without a warrant and how unjustified government access can take place in practice. Systematic government access to private-sector data can take place through warrants issued by a court. Notably, due to the unique truce situation, under which the Republic of Korea is technically still at war with North Korea, Korean authorities are sometimes allowed to obtain private-sector data without warrants, for national security purposes. This chapter examines the statutory grounds for governmental access to private-sector data in Korea, focusing specifically on issues such as the circumstances under which access is allowed without a warrant and how unjustified government access can take place in practice.

40

Jacques, du Plessis. Ch.3 Validity, s.2: Grounds for avoidance, Art.3.2.6. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198702627.003.0060.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This commentary focuses on Article 3.2.6 of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) concerning threat as a reason for invalidity. Under Art 3.2.6, a party may avoid the contract when it has been led to conclude the contract by the other party's unjustified threat which, having regard to the circumstances, is so imminent and serious as to leave the first party no reasonable alternative. In particular, a threat is unjustified if the act or omission with which a party has been threatened is wrongful in itself; or it is wrongful to use it as a means to obtain the conclusion of the contract. This commentary discusses the requirements for the threat, the consequences of the threat, threats involving third parties, and exclusion of liability for threat.

41

Witting, Christian. 12. Trespass to land. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198811169.003.0012.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This chapter examines the protection against interferences with land provided by tort law. It explains that the action for trespass to land protects the interest of the claimant in having his land free from the unjustified physical intrusion of another. It discusses the elements of trespass and describes the types of acts that constitute it. This chapter also considers remedies available for defendants in trespass to land cases, which include injunctions, actions for the recovery of land, and damages.

42

Johnsen, Bredo. The Argument for Radical Skepticism Concerning the External World. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190662776.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

In this chapter the author extracts from Hume’s writings a powerful argument that he takes to be the argument for radical external world skepticism as that view is understood by Agrippa in his famous trilemma. According to this argument, no belief can be justified by any other beliefs. There are three reasons for this. First, any attempt to present such a justification will beg the question by appealing to an unjustified belief. Second, it will be circular. Third, it will require an infinitely long chain of justifying beliefs.

43

Thomason, Krista K. Ajax Reviled. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190843274.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Shaming punishments have increased in popularity, and social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook have become mediums for public shaming of bad behavior. Can these practices be justified? This chapter distinguishes between three practices all labeled “shaming:” invitations to shame, shaming, and stigmatizing. It then argues that invitations to shame can be justified in certain circumstances, but shaming and stigmatizing cannot be justified. The primary argument in favor of shaming and stigmatizing is that both practices are powerful tools to change behavior. Shaming is the practice of holding up the flaws of others for public scorn, and this practice is unjustified even when it is done for noble reasons.

44

Chambers, Clare. Conclusion. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198744009.003.0007.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The conclusion recaps the arguments of Against Marriage: An Egalitarian Defence of the Marriage-Free State. The book presents a critique of state-recognized marriage and an alternative model for regulating personal relationships. The main critique of marriage is that it is inegalitarian. Feminists have long criticized the gendered nature of marriage. Even reformed marriage creates unjustified inequalities between married and unmarried people and their children. State recognition of marriage also involves the state in making controversial judgements about ways of life, undermining liberty. In place of state-recognized marriage, the marriage-free state would regulate relationship practices in a piecemeal fashion and without requiring a special status.

45

Eisenberg, Melvin A. Four Underlying Principles of Contract Law and the Foundational Contract-Law Standard. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199731404.003.0003.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Chapter 3 develops four underlying principles of contract law and the foundational contract law standard. Under the most fundamental principle of contract law the aim of contract law should be to effectuate the objectives of parties to promissory transactions, provided that appropriate policy and moral conditions, such as freedom from duress and fraud, are satisfied, and subject to appropriate constraints, such as capacity and legality. The normative theory of contract law, taken together with the four underlying principles described in this chapter, comprise the foundational contract-law standard. Contract-law rules that are supported by the foundational standard are justified. Contract-law rules that are not so supported are unjustified.

46

Frier, Bruce W. A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197573211.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This Casebook explores the writings of Roman lawyers on the law of contracts, a rich and hugely influential area of Roman private law. The 235 “Cases” are actual texts deriving, for the most part, from the Digest of Justinian (535 ce), but written hundreds of years earlier during the Classical era of Roman law. These Cases give a fairly complete view of the concepts and methods used to create rules and judge contract cases in Roman courts. The Casebook concentrates especially on two central Roman contracts, stipulation and sale; but all other contracts and contract-related issues are discussed, as well as Roman legal thinking on unjustified enrichment.

47

Talbert, Matthew, and Jessica Wolfendale. Blaming Perpetrators. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190675875.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Chapter 5 explains why the arguments in the preceding chapter fail. On our view, an agent is blameworthy if her behavior manifests an inappropriate degree of moral regard for others. Typically, this involves treating others with unjustified contempt, ill will, or certain forms of indifference. We argue that a perpetrator’s actions may manifest these objectionable qualities regardless of whether he believes that he is acting permissibly, and regardless of whether he is at fault for possessing this belief. This claim is developed in the context of the dispositional account of war crimes presented in Chapter 3, which is particularly well suited to our account of moral responsibility since it stresses the role that agents’ beliefs, goals, and values play in their actions.

48

Eisenberg, Melvin A. The Principle of Anticipatory Repudiation. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199731404.003.0048.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Chapter 48 concerns anticipatory repudiation, that is, repudiation of a contract by a promisor before she is required to perform. An anticipatory repudiation may consist of either an expression by the promisor that she intends not to perform all or a significant part of her duties under the contract, or conduct by the promisor that leads to her inability or apparent inability to perform all or a significant part of her duties under the contract. Many courts have held that an expression will constitute an anticipatory repudiation only if the expression is an unequivocal repudiation of the contract. This strict test is an unjustified departure from the general principles of interpretation, should not be followed, and is not followed by all courts.

49

Dempsey, James X., and Fred H. Cate. Recommendations for Government and Industry. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190685515.003.0023.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The chapters in this volume are uniform in their commitment to the proposition that terrorism can be effectively fought and national security interests can be defended within a system of oversight and control that protects both corporate interests and individual privacy. Moreover, they are remarkable in their consistency in describing the components of an effective system of checks and balances. This chapter draws on the work of the contributors to this volume and on the flood of policy developments over the past five years to recommend a coherent framework for collection of private-sector data. The elements of this framework for governments are legality, proportionality, and accountability. For corporations, they are based on adoption of internal policies, internal and external accountability, and transparency, backed up by a willingness to challenge overbroad or unjustified government demands.

50

Wolff Heintschel, von Heinegg. Part 1 The Cold War Era (1945–89), 14 The USS Pueblo Incident—1968. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198784357.003.0014.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This contribution discusses the 1968 USS Pueblo Incident by assessing the factual background on the basis of available documents and by providing a legal analysis on the basis of the then applicable international law. In view of the contentious issue of the USS Pueblo’s location at the time of the attack and her seizure by the armed forces of the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea, the discussion of the legal issues at stake is not limited to the ius ad bellum but must be extended to the law of the sea, in particular the breadth of the territorial sea according to customary international law recognized in 1968 and the status of foreign warships. As regards the ius ad bellum, the unjustified use of force against a sovereign immune warship is considered an armed attack triggering the flag state’s right of self-defence.