Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Dermatitis, allergic, contact / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Dermatitis, allergic, contact'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Dermatitis, allergic, contact.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 12 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Dermatitis, allergic, contact.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Gergovska, Malena, Razvigor Darlenski, and Jana Kazandjieva. "Nickel Allergy of the Skin and Beyond." Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets 20, no. 7 (September 9, 2020): 1003–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1871530320666200228124453.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Background: Hypersensitization to nickel is one of the most common contact allergies in the modern world and it is considered to be a major cause of contact dermatitis, especially for hand eczema. Objective: The aim of this paper is to describe many faces of the nickel allergy and to find out different diagnostic, potential strategies for treatment and prevention in hypersensitized patients. A personal clinical experience with practical clinical cases of contact dermatitis to nickel has also been presented. Methods: Electronic databases on this topic was carried out using PubMed-Medline. Results: The literature review identified many articles reporting for nickel contact allergy and pointing the metal as number one allergen in the frequency of positive skin patch test reactions in a large population worldwide. Herein, a summary of the current understanding and evidence on nickel allergy with practical approach and proposed recommendations to the dermatologist, general practitioner, and the allergist were prepared. Conclusions: The prevalence of nickel allergy represents an important socio-economical and health issue. Metal is one of the most common sensitizing agents worldwide. The morbidity due to this metal represents the allergic contact dermatitis and it is constantly growing in many countries. There are also cases of systemic allergic contact dermatitis, where they could be easily misdiagnosed as adverse drug reactions, which lead to delay of the correct diagnosis and inappropriate treatment.

2

Yoshihisa, Yoko, and Tadamichi Shimizu. "Metal Allergy and Systemic Contact Dermatitis: An Overview." Dermatology Research and Practice 2012 (2012): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/749561.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Contact dermatitis is produced by external skin exposure to an allergen, but sometimes a systemically administered allergen may reach the skin and remain concentrated there with the aid of the circulatory system, leading to the production of systemic contact dermatitis (SCD). Metals such as nickel, cobalt, chromium, and zinc are ubiquitous in our environment. Metal allergy may result in allergic contact dermatitis and also SCD. Systemic reactions, such as hand dermatitis or generalized eczematous reactions, can occur due to dietary nickel or cobalt ingestion. Zinc-containing dental fillings can induce oral lichen planus, palmoplantar pustulosis, and maculopapular rash. A diagnosis of sensitivity to metal is established by epicutaneous patch testing and oral metal challenge with metals such as nickel, cobalt, chromium, and zinc.In vitrotests, such as the lymphocyte stimulating test (LST), have some advantages over patch testing to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis. Additionally, the determination of the production of several cytokines by primary peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures is a potentially promisingin vitromethod for the discrimination of metal allergies, including SCD, as compared with the LST.

3

Melnikova, Ksenya S., Elena D. Kuwshinowa, and Vera A. Reviakina. "Allergic diseases at an early age." Pediatrics. Consilium Medicum, no. 2 (June 15, 2021): 141–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.26442/26586630.2021.2.200813.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

In recent years, there has been a sharp increase in the incidence of allergic diseases (ADs), mainly in countries with a high level of development. Particularly noted is the increase in the prevalence of AZs in young children, among which cutaneous and gastrointestinal manifestations of allergy are the most common. These include atopic dermatitis (ATD), urticaria, gastrointestinal manifestations associated in most cases with food allergy, as well as contact allergic dermatitis, and insect allergy. The leading mechanism of development is immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reactions. There are three main factors that predispose to AZ: genetic, direct contact with an allergen, and external environmental factors. The article deals with the causes, manifestations, therapy and diagnosis of a number of allergic diseases: urticaria, allergic contact dermatitis, insect allergy and some methods of therapy.

4

Arslan, Sevket, Serkan Aksan, Ramazan Ucar, and Ahmet Zafer Caliskaner. "Contact dermatitis to cobalt chloride with an unusual mechanism." Prosthetics and Orthotics International 39, no. 5 (May 29, 2014): 419–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309364614534293.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Background:Contact dermatitis is a frequent inflammatory skin disease. A suspected diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms, a plausible contact to allergens and a suitable history of dermatitis. Therefore, careful diagnosis by patch testing is of great importance because the patch testing is important to find out which allergen/material causes the complaints. Metallic allergens such as cobalt are among the most common causes of allergic contact dermatitis, but frequencies of contact dermatitis to these allergens may vary in different skin areas. Here, we report an unusual case of cobalt allergy on the skin contact with the prosthetic leg of a 30-year-old female patient.Case description and methods:The patient developed maculopapular and vesicular lesions on her contact region of residual limb to prosthetic leg.Findings and outcome:She underwent standard patch testing, which resulted in a strong positive reaction to cobalt chloride.Conclusion:This case report may serve to remind doctors to be aware of potential allergic reactions to prostheses and to enable them to recognize a metal allergy if it appears. Prosthetists should also be reminded of potential allergic reactions.Clinical relevanceCobalt can be used as an accelerator in making a prosthetic socket. Several cases have been reported concerning allergies to components of the prosthetic socket. This is the first report of sensitization to cobalt which is used in making a prosthetic leg.

5

Garipova, R. V. "Atex allergy in health care workers." Kazan medical journal 93, no. 2 (April 15, 2012): 307–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/kmj2316.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Presented was a review of the literature devoted to allergy to the components of latex among health care workers. Described were three types of reactions to natural rubber latex: (1), contact dermatitis, (2) type I allergic reactions associated with immunoglobulin E, and (3) type IV allergic reactions. Clinical symptoms of latex allergy can manifest as local [contact dermatitis (dermatitis from irritation), allergic contact dermatitis, contact urticaria] and/or systemic (rhinitis, conjunctivitis, difficulty in breathing attacks, widespread urticaria, Quincke’s edema to the extent of an anaphylactic shock) reactions. For the diagnosis of latex sensitization the applicational («glove») test is of particular importance, which consists of controlled wearing of latex gloves for 1 hour or more before the onset of symptoms of skin irritation, local and systemic allergic reactions become evident. Prick test - the most unified, technological and highly sensitive (up to 97% in the diagnosis of latex sensitization) method out of all the skin tests, virtually eliminates the occurrence of nonspecific reactions due to skin irritation or the reactions of its vessels. In the Russian Federation the prick test for the diagnosis of allergy to latex is not yet available, as the latex allergen has not yet been registered. There are publications, indicating the high sensitivity of the nasal provocation test in the diagnosis of latex allergy. The latex-specific immunoglobulin E is mainly detected by the radioallergosorbent test and enzyme immunoassay, sometimes by immunoblotting. The elimination of contact with latex products is the basis of the etiological treatment. The issue of the rational employment of health workers is very relevant. With latex allergy elimination diet is recommended to eliminate the products with cross-allergenic properties with latex: bananas, avocado, kiwi, chestnuts, peaches, tomatoes, shrimp, walnuts, etc. The usage of powder-free gloves with low allergenic potential led to a sharp reduction in the incidence of allergic reactions to latex among health care workers.

6

Sandre, Matthew, and Sandra Skotnicki-Grant. "A Case of a Paediatric Patient With Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Benzoyl Peroxide." Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery 22, no. 2 (September 18, 2017): 226–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1203475417733462.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Allergic contact dermatitis to benzoyl peroxide can occur in up to 6.5% of those with a history of exposure to this potential allergen. Conversely, irritant contact dermatitis is very common with benzoyl peroxide and can be differentiated from allergic contact dermatitis based on the patient’s history and clinical signs and symptoms. We present a case of a paediatric patient with patch test–confirmed severe allergic contact dermatitis to benzoyl peroxide requiring hospitalisation and systemic treatment.

7

Sundararaj, Thilak, Meera Govindaraju, and Brindha Thangaraj. "A study of 300 cases of allergic contact dermatitis." International Journal of Research in Dermatology 3, no. 1 (February 23, 2017): 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.intjresdermatol20164409.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a delayed type of hypersensitivity from contact with a specific allergen. The aim of the study was to study age, sex incidence of allergic contact dermatitis and incidence of various allergen in patch test positive cases for that allergen in patients presenting to dermatology department in Meenakshi Medical College & Research institute, Kanchipuram.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis was made by patch testing.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Most cases of allergic contact dermatitis fall in the age group of 41-50 years. More common in males than females. Allergic contact dermatitis to cement was found to be the commonest cause in our study<span lang="EN-IN">. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Allergic contact dermatitis is common in middle age and incidence of disease is common in males than females. The higher incidence of allergic contact dermatitis to cement is due to more people being employed in construction working in this part of the world<span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>

8

Pestana, Catarina, Raquel Gomes, Vítor Pinheiro, Miguel Gouveia, Isabel Antunes, and Margarida Gonçalo. "Principais Causas de Dermatite de Contacto Alérgica Ocupacional: Um Estudo de Três Anos no Centro de Portugal." Acta Médica Portuguesa 29, no. 7-8 (August 31, 2016): 449. http://dx.doi.org/10.20344/amp.6605.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Introduction: Allergic contact dermatitis, along with irritant contact dermatitis and immediate contact reactions, contact urticarial, are the most frequent dermatological occupational disease, but seldom reported to the National authorities.Material and Methods: We performed a 3-year retrospective study at the allergology section in the Dermatology Clinic of the University Hospital of Coimbra to evaluate the main occupations diagnosed as occupational allergic contact dermatitis, most common allergens and the effect of the modification of the work station in the evolution of the disease.Results: During 2012 - 2014 among the 941 patch tested patients, 77 (8.2%) were diagnosed with occupational allergic contact dermatitis, with 169 positive patch tests related to occupational exposure, 55 detected within the baseline and 114 in complementary test series. In most cases allergic contact dermatitis involved the hands (88.3%), main professional activities were nail estheticians and hairdressers due to the manipulation of (meth)acrylates, the most common allergen in the study. After the diagnosis, 27.3% abandonedthe work, 23.4% changed the work station, 49% avoided exposure to the responsible allergen. Contact dermatitis resolved in 39% of the patients, improved in 39% but had no change in the remaining 22%.Discussion: This study, although including only patients from the center of Portugal, evaluates a large sample of patients with different occupations studied with a larger variety of allergens. Apart from classical allergens and professions responsible for occupational allergic contact dermatitis that we found in lower numbers (thiuram mix, paraphenylenodiamine, chromium and cobalt in health care workers, hairdressers and in the building industry), (meth)acrylates tested outside the European and Portuguese Baseline Series were the main cause of occupational allergic contact dermatitis, namely in nail estheticians. Methylisothiazolinone, the second more frequentoccupational contact allergen in the present study was identified in different occupations as a result of the widespread use of this preservative that is causing a real ‘epidemics’ of allergic contact dermatitis all over Europe in the last years.Conclusion: Nail estheticians are not usually referred as an occupation with a high risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis. Nevertheless, the current fashion combined with professionals poorly informed about the risk of their activity and the high sensitizing potential of (meth)acrylates, leads to a higher frequency of allergic contact dermatitis in recent years.

9

Cohen, Stephanie R., Jesús A. Cárdenas-de la Garza, Paige Dekker, Wasim Haidari, Sarah S. Chisolm, Sarah L. Taylor, and Steven R. Feldman. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis Secondary to Moisturizers." Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery 24, no. 4 (April 15, 2020): 350–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1203475420919396.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Background: Moisturizers are cosmetic products used routinely to manage various skin conditions. Even though moisturizers are often thought to have minimal or no adverse reactions, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to these products can develop in some cases. Methods: We studied ingredients included in 3 of the most commonly used moisturizer brands, identified their presence in standard patch testing series, and evaluated their allergenic potential, categorizing the allergens as frequent or infrequent. The standard patch testing series used as reference were the Thin-layer Rapid Use Epicutaneous patch test (T.R.U.E. test), the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) screening standard series, and the American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) core allergen series. Results: Aveeno, Cetaphil, and Cerave products had a total of 12, 14, and 9 potential allergens, respectively, the majority of which were infrequent and not included in standard patch testing series. Conclusion: Being aware of the allergenic potential of commonly used moisturizers may help healthcare providers when evaluating patients with ACD. Further testing is recommended in a targeted manner when suspecting ACD with negative standard patch testing series or when ACD is refractory to treatment.

10

Kimber, Ian, David A. Basketter, G. Frank Gerberick, and Rebecca J. Dearman. "Allergic contact dermatitis." International Immunopharmacology 2, no. 2-3 (February 2002): 201–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1567-5769(01)00173-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Weston, William L., and Anna Bruckner. "ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS." Pediatric Clinics of North America 47, no. 4 (August 2000): 897–907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70247-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Mark, Barry J., and Raymond G. Slavin. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Medical Clinics of North America 90, no. 1 (January 2006): 169–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2005.08.008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Andersen, Klaus E., and Søren Frankild. "Allergic contact dermatitis." Clinics in Dermatology 15, no. 4 (July 1997): 645–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0738-081x(97)00066-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Fisher, Alexander A. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Physician and Sportsmedicine 21, no. 3 (March 1993): 65–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00913847.1993.11710335.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Goihman-Yahr, Mauricio. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Dermatitis 1, no. 3 (September 1990): 198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01206501-199009000-00014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Goihman-Yahr, Mauricio. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 1, no. 3 (September 1990): 198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01634989-199009000-00014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Becker, Detlef. "Allergic contact dermatitis." JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 11, no. 7 (June 26, 2013): 607–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddg.12143.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Nassau, Stacy, and Luz Fonacier. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Medical Clinics of North America 104, no. 1 (January 2020): 61–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2019.08.012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Mowad, Christen M. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Dermatologic Clinics 38, no. 3 (July 2020): i. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0733-8635(20)30027-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Nishioka, Kiyoshi. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." International Journal of Dermatology 24, no. 1 (January 1985): 1–08. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1985.tb05345.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Cavani, Andrea, Silvia Sebastiani, Francesca Nasorri, Cristina Albanesi, and Giampiero Girolomoni. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Allergy & Clinical Immunology International - Journal of the World Allergy Organization 14, no. 4 (2002): 156–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/0838-1925.14.4.156.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Bergstresser, Paul R. "Contact Allergic Dermatitis." Archives of Dermatology 125, no. 2 (February 1, 1989): 276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1989.01670140128025.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Mowad, Christen M., Bryan Anderson, Pamela Scheinman, Suwimon Pootongkam, Susan Nedorost, and Bruce Brod. "Allergic contact dermatitis." Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 74, no. 6 (June 2016): 1029–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1139.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Mowad, Christen M., Bryan Anderson, Pamela Scheinman, Suwimon Pootongkam, Susan Nedorost, and Bruce Brod. "Allergic contact dermatitis." Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 74, no. 6 (June 2016): 1043–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1144.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Kostner, Lisa, Florian Anzengruber, Caroline Guillod, Mike Recher, Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier, and Alexander A. Navarini. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America 37, no. 1 (February 2017): 141–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2016.08.014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Fonacier, Luz S., and Janelle M. Sher. "Allergic contact dermatitis." Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 113, no. 1 (July 2014): 9–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2014.03.018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Adler, Brandon L., and Vincent A. DeLeo. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis." JAMA Dermatology 157, no. 3 (March 1, 2021): 364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5639.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Krinsky, Daniel L. "Allergic contact dermatitis." Pharmacy Today 27, no. 5 (May 2021): 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ptdy.2021.04.006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Kochergin, N. G. "Allergic contact dermatitis." Russian Journal of Allergy 11, no. 1 (December 15, 2014): 73–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.36691/rja573.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Russian Dermatology describes irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. The latter one being immune associated is characterized by huge spectrum of clinical features demanding individual approaches to topical corticosteroid therapy. Hydrocortizone 17-butirate in the formulations of ointment, cream, Lipocream and Crelo allows effectively and safely solve therapeutic problems of topical treatment.

30

Marty, Chelsy L., and Janet F. Cheng. "Irritant Contact Dermatitis Precipitating Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Dermatitis (formerly American Journal of Contact Dermatitis) 16, no. 02 (2005): 087. http://dx.doi.org/10.2310/6620.2005.04028.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Marty, Chelsy L., and Janet F. Cheng. "Irritant Contact Dermatitis Precipitating Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Dermatitis 16, no. 2 (June 2005): 87–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200506000-00006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Keir, J., J. English, and N. Fergie. "Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis." Journal of Laryngology & Otology 123, no. 5 (January 13, 2009): 558–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022215109004289.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

AbstractA deterioration in chronic inflammatory ear disease despite topical medication, or failure of the condition to improve with such treatment, should raise the possibility of allergic contact dermatitis. Allergen testing (patch testing) is the ‘gold standard’ method of identifying an agent causing allergic contact dermatitis.We describe an ENT patch test series applied by our department as a screening device for this condition.

33

Barata, Ana Rita Rodrigues, and Luis Conde-Salazar. "Protein contact dermatitis - case report." Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 88, no. 4 (August 2013): 611–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20132023.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Protein contact dermatitis is a skin condition not well known and underdiagnosed by dermatologists, resulting from an IgE-mediated allergic reaction. Clinically it presents as a chronic hand and/or forearms eczema of occupational origin, especially in professionals who work as food handlers. Epicutaneous tests are negative, and to diagnose this condition it is necessary to perform immediate-type allergy tests. The most sensitive and practical is the prick-by-prick test with food that the patient refers to cause intense itching after immediate skin contact. Treatment is symptomatic, and it is mandatory to avoid the responsible allergen, wearing plastic gloves and even sometimes leaving the workplace for symptom resolution.

34

Queirós, C. S., M. I. Alexandre, P. M. Garrido, L. Soares de Almeida, T. Correia, and P. Filipe. "Acquired Leukoderma in a Patient with Allergic Contact Dermatitis to FreeStyle Libre®." Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology 78, no. 4 (December 19, 2020): 381–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.4.1272.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

In the past few years, the glucose sensor FreeStyle Libre® has been associated with several cases of allergic contact dermatitis. The allergen responsible for most of these cases is isobornyl acrylate, a substance present within the sensor that migrates through the adhesive, thereby reaching the skin. Acquired leukoderma, which may occur in an area previously affected by allergic contact dermatitis, has been described in several medical devices with adhesives. However, until the present, only one case of leukoderma induced by allergic contact dermatitis to FreeStyle Libre® has been described. We report the case of a 41-year-old woman with diabetes mellitus type 1, who developed leukoderma in association with allergic contact dermatitis to this glucose sensor.

35

Taylor, James S., and Yung-Hian Leow. "Cutaneous Reactions to Rubber." Rubber Chemistry and Technology 73, no. 3 (July 1, 2000): 427–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.5254/1.3547600.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Abstract The three major adverse cutaneous reactions to rubber include natural rubber latex allergy, irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. An overview of relevant aspects of the types of natural and synthetic rubber, rubber production, and specific chemicals used in compounding and vulcanization, as well as latex proteins is essential to an understanding of these reactions. Natural rubber latex allergy is a type I, IgE mediated, immediate hypersensitivity reaction to one or more proteins present in natural rubber latex with clinical manifestations ranging from contact urticaria to allergic rhinitis, asthma, and anaphylaxis. Over the past decade, natural rubber latex allergy has become a major medical, occupational health, and medicolegal problem. Individuals at highest risk are patients with spina bifida and health care workers. Diagnosis is based largely on clinical history and examination, and serologic and intracutaneous testing. Irritant contact dermatitis is non-immunologic and is the most common cutaneous reaction to rubber. Cumulative exposure to low-grade irritants impairs the barrier function of the skin and allows penetration of potential irritants and allergens. Diagnosis is based on history of exposure to known irritants, cutaneous examination, and exclusion of allergy. Allergic contact dermatitis is a type IV cell mediated, delayed hypersensitivity reaction which occurs primarily from exposure to rubber chemicals either directly or from residual amounts present in rubber products. Most cases present with an eczematous dermatitis, but purpura, lichenoid dermatitis, and depigmentation occasionally occur. Diagnosis is made on the basis of history, examination, and epicutaneous patch testing with rubber chemicals and rubber products. Treatment is with allergen and irritant avoidance and substitution, environmental control, personal protective equipment and topical and systemic pharmacologic therapy. A unified approach is needed in the diagnosis and treatment of adverse cutaneous reactions to rubber and it is important to remember that some patients may have both contact dermatitis and natural latex allergy. Determining the bioavailability and elicitation threshold of rubber allergens may be helpful in reducing allergic reactions from consumer and industrial rubber products.

36

Kapitanova, V. K., N. E. Petrova, M. Yu Zhdanova, and L. V. Nevskaya. "Metal Allergy." BIOpreparations. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment 19, no. 2 (June 16, 2019): 88–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.30895/2221-996x-2019-19-2-88-93.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Allergic reactions associated with sensitisation to metals are a common but underexplored problem. Due to the frequent use of metals and their alloys there has been an increase in the number of registered cases of allergic reactions. Recently there have been cases when allergic reactions were induced by metals that were previously considered absolutely inert and non-allergenic, such as gold, palladium and others. The aim of this work was to summarise scientific data on allergic reactions to metals and their diagnosis in humans. In medicine, alloys of nickel, palladium and gold are used in the manufacture of both surgical instruments and various implants used in orthopedics, endovascular surgery, gynecology and dentistry. Allergic reactions to these metals may lead to failure of artificial joints, thrombosis of endovascular stents, stomatitis, gingivitis, and dermatitis. The most frequent allergic reaction to metals is contact dermatitis which is most frequently caused by nickel. Metal allergies are diagnosed by skin tests. There are no Russian-made diagnostic systems for detecting metal allergies. The diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis is performed with the help of AllerTest test kit («TRUE Test», Denmark). Therefore, elaboration of a domestic diagnostic test for timely detection of allergies to metals is still relevant.

37

Poljacki, Mirjana, Marina Jovanovic, Pal Boza, Neda Mimica-Dukic, Aleksandra Petrovic, and Zdenka Novovic. "Is Vojvodina a risk area for contact weed allergies?" Medical review 58, no. 3-4 (2005): 123–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/mpns0504123p.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Introduction After detecting erythema multiforme due to contact with weeds, dandelion (Taraxacum offwinale, Compositae) and common chickweed (Stellaria media, Caryophyllaceae), which are ubiquitous plants in Vojvodina, and concerning properties of commercial screening allergens in detection of allergy to plants, we investigated contact allergy to dandelion and to common chick-weed, using their extracts. Material and methods Epicutaneous tests were performed using originally prepared ether extracts of these plants, 0.1% and 3% pet., in 263 individuals: 43 with extrinsic atopic dermatitis, 55 with allergic contact dermatitis, 118 with non-allergic chronic inflammatory skin diseases and 47 healthy adults. Results Our results have shown that testing with both extracts (both concentrations) represents a safe method, since no irritation or sensibilization occurred. The overall prevalence of allergy to dandelion extract was 1.14%, and for common chickweed extract 2.28%. Discussion Plant allergies (especially Compositae) cannot always be detected by standard screening allergens. Additional testing with dandelion extract can detect most cases, which is in agreement with our results. Isolation of essential oil from common chick-weed proved the allergenic potential of this plant. The prevalence of detected allergy to dandelion as well as to common chickweed was higher than 1 %. Conclusion These ubiquitous weeds and high prevalence of detected allergies have included Vojvodina into a risk zone for getting contact sensitivity to dandelion and common chickweed. Dandelion extract should be considered for Compositae screening series and common chickweed extract for specific plant series in Vojvodina. .

38

Shariff, V. N. S. Ahamed, K. Deepa, L. Balamurugan, and S. Nirmala. "A study on incidence of various allergens involved in allergic contact dermatitis by patch testing among 150 patients in a tertiary care hospital in South India." International Journal of Research in Dermatology 4, no. 2 (April 25, 2018): 205. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.intjresdermatol20181820.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Allergic contact dermatitis is common dermatoses seen among patients attending dermatology clinics. Allergic contact dermatitis is due to delayed type of hypersensitivity reaction. The diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis is made by patch testing. A positive reaction to a patch test commonly proves the cause of dermatitis.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A retrospective study was conducted<strong> </strong>to estimate the incidence of various allergens among 150 patch test positive patients with allergic contact dermatitis who had attended the dermatology OPD in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, between October 2014 and September 2016. All the details regarding history, examination findings, investigations and patch test results were collected from case records, the data were tabulated and analysed.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Allergic contact dermatitis to cement was the commonest (44.7%), followed by nickel (10%) and plant antigens (9.3%). The commonest allergen to be tested positive was Potassium dichromate (82 cases), followed nickel (15 cases) and formaldehyde (8 cases). Most of the patients were in the age category between 41 and 50 years (47 cases– 31.33%). Male to female ratio was 2.41:1. 14 were atopic individuals (9.33%) by Hanifin and Rajka's criteria. Allergic contact dermatitis in 103 cases of our study were of occupational in origin (67%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Avoidance of allergen and proper preventive measures in workplace and day to day activities will lead to significant decrease in the morbidity of the disease and improvement in quality of life in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. </p>

39

Mikov, Ivan, Ivan Turkalj, and Marina Jovanovic. "Occupational contact allergic dermatitis in dentistry." Vojnosanitetski pregled 68, no. 6 (2011): 523–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/vsp1106523m.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Introduction. Dental professionals may be at increased risk of developing occupational allergic diseases specially to methacrylates that can permeate protective disposable gloves. Case report. We presented a case of occupational allergic contact dermatitis in a 28-year-old dental technician. The patient had complained of itching and cracking of fingers for 6 months. The dermatitis improved over weekends. Skin erythema and scaling were present with primarily involvement of the fingertips. Patch testing with dental series gave positive vesicular reaction to methyl methacrylate. Follow-up after 6 months of allergen avoidance showed a complete regression of dermatitis. Conclusion. Methacrylates serve as bases for acrylic resins which are used in prosthetics. Methyl methacrylate as a small molecular acrylate can permeate thin protective disposable gloves. Using adequate personal protective equipment, like nitrile rubber gloves, is the most important preventive measure in this occupation. Health practitioners should recognize possible occupational hazards in dentistry and implement appropriate preventive measures to protect health of workers.

40

Dhar, Sandipan, SahanaM Srinivas, and AshokK Bajaj. "Allergic contact dermatitis in atopic dermatitis." Indian Journal of Paediatric Dermatology 19, no. 4 (2018): 304. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijpd.ijpd_105_18.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Pootongkam, Suwimon, and Susan Nedorost. "Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Atopic Dermatitis." Current Treatment Options in Allergy 1, no. 4 (July 30, 2014): 329–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40521-014-0028-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Constantin, Maria-Magdalena, Stefana Bucur, Clara Matei, Iuliana Elena Nita, and Traian Constantin. "The European Baseline Series in Romania: Results of Patch Testing in Contact Dermatitis and Determination of the Most Frequently Awareness in Adult Patients." Revista de Chimie 70, no. 4 (May 15, 2019): 1337–2341. http://dx.doi.org/10.37358/rc.19.4.7122.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

In Romania, data on patch testing are lacking and the significance and applicability of the European baseline series (EBS) needs to be evaluated. The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of contact allergy to the EBS and to determine the most common post-test sensitization occurred in the population of patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis in Romania. Demographic data were collected from 252 patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Pacients were patch tested with 28-allergen EBS.The positive patch test was observed in 80.16% patients. The most prevalent contact allergens were nickel sulphate (15.08%), fragrance mix I & II (13.10%) and potassium dichromate (9.52%). Differences in sensitization prevalences to some allergens of the EBS compared with other European countries were recognized. The current EBS is a suitable diagnostic tool for contact allergy in Romania.

43

Tamrazova, O. B., S. P. Seleznev, and A. V. Tamrazova. "Henna allergic contact dermatitis." Klinicheskaya dermatologiya i venerologiya 18, no. 5 (2019): 624. http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/klinderma201918051624.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

NAKAGAWA, MIKIO. "Textile Allergic Contact Dermatitis." FIBER 65, no. 7 (2009): P.220—P.224. http://dx.doi.org/10.2115/fiber.65.p_220.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Aihara, Michiko, and Zenro Ikezawa. "Neonatal allergic contact dermatitis." Contact Dermatitis 18, no. 2 (February 1988): 105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02752.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Nettis, E., M. C. Colanardi, A. Ferrannini, and A. Tursi. "Airborne allergic contact dermatitis." Allergy 56, no. 6 (June 2001): 583–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.056006583.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Goldenberg, Alina, Catalina Matiz, and Lawrence F. Eichenfield. "Religious Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Pediatric Dermatology 32, no. 4 (May 13, 2015): e191-e192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pde.12613.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Rosina, Paolo, Carlo Chieregato, and Donatella Schena. "Allergic contact dermatitis fromPleurotusmushroom." Contact Dermatitis 33, no. 4 (October 1995): 277–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00491.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Nakada, Tokio, and Howard I. Maibach. "Eyeglass allergic contact dermatitis." Contact Dermatitis 39, no. 1 (July 1998): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05802.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Matthys, Erin, Amir Zahir, and Alison Ehrlich. "Shoe Allergic Contact Dermatitis." Dermatitis 25, no. 4 (2014): 163–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/der.0000000000000049.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles